132 Comments
тна Return to thread
Comment deleted
Mar 13, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yeah I also told Kirsch that the datasets he published seem to contradict Neil and Fenton's theory.

Neil may have also blocked me because I pointed out an error in their old Substack posts here: https://usmortality.substack.com/p/new-zealands-all-cause-deaths-and/comment/51115170.

In the spreadsheet I linked to, I calculated the baseline by first calculating the mortality rate for each age in 2021-2023 among the general population of New Zealand. Then I took a weighted average of the mortality rates where the weight was the number of person-days under each age in Barry's dataset. I have tried to get Kirsch to adopt the same method but I don't seem to have been successful so far.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Mar 14, 2024
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

If you use the mortality rate of the general NZ population in 2021-2023 as the baseline, you can get an idea about the mortality rate of unvaccinated people in case the vaccinated people in Barry's dataset are representative of vaccinated people as a whole (after adjusting for age which is the only confounder I'm able to adjust for here). So if the vaccinated people in Barry's dataset get positive age-normalized excess mortality then it suggests that unvaccinated people have negative excess mortality, and vice versa.

When I calculated the baseline using mortality rates in 2017-2019 instead, it actually reduced the excess mortality of vaccinated people from about -4% to about -6%: https://i.ibb.co/vHzH9Z4/ppd-buckets-2021-to-2023-vs-2017-to-2019-baseline.png. That's because NZ had high mortality in 2017 but negative excess deaths in 2021, and there was a decreasing trend in mortality rates within age groups before COVID.

Expand full comment