I will debunk these as needed. I'm also offering to bet $250K or more that the NZ data can be used with publicly available data to show that the COVID vaccines are killing people. Any takers??
Barry Young gets the "quote of the day award" Its harder to look than to leap. Its like he was staring into the maw of hell and could not take it anymore. Kiwis must be way too trusting to let this go on right under their nose and not be outraged. Weak people invite corrupt and evil government.
So what seems missing are parallel corroborating data such as ambulance call records, funeral home business data, casket sales, embalmer records such as turned up in the UK. And of course insurance company data. These data in NZ may be outside the Barry Young data set, but should be discoverable via other fairly reliable means. Any word on these yet? Any one looking. Seems we have been around this block before.
Technically there was no criminal intention and no harm done to anyone.. but top officials / vaxx machinators. Barry knew that data wasn't going to be released by (and with) following a long bureaucratic process. So far, have they analysed big chunk of missing data, that they still keep hidden? No, they did not. They are not in rush or want to memory hole all this. It's quite possible/probable that even more people will die, if analysis and conclusions are not provided, asap. That sudden deaths period is not over. Barry might, rightfully, excuse himself by explaining to the judge that fast release was crucial in order to prevent more deaths. Would you sue a good Samaritan, for an assault and bodily harm (breaking your hand), while pulling you from burning car crush. How is that any different.
Charged with: NZ Criminal Code Section 249 – Accessing computer system for dishonest purpose
- obtains any property or [he had a clearance to "obtain" or get, acquire, or secure every day]
- advantage; or [i.e. financial advantage, use it for his advantage, doesn't apply]
- causes loss to any other person. [no loss, no personal details released, data in pristine condition]
There is no mention in CC about RELEASING (that might be causing loss) of certain parts of such property to public (de facto owners). Only breached some part of his employment contract and already paid for it. Nothing criminal here.
I was a paying subscriber to this substack for several months, however I decided to pay other substackers who almost certainly have fewer funds - Seth Keshel, Ian Brennan, and most recently, WelcomeTheEagle. Seth Keshel is an election integrity writer and Ian Brennan reports on matters relating to Kansas, especially Lawrence, from a conservative viewpoint. (Despite Kansas being a conservative state, all the big papers are liberal).
I also gave $25 to Steve's fund for a study into rates of COVID adverse events a year or so ago.
I have to keep reminding myself that the infighting and divisiveness is simply a reflection of the fact that every person senses him/herself uniquely, and this creates his/her very own external 'realities'. For men especially this is quite a big ego and grief to let go.
Love and gratitude, as always, and genuine peace and abundance (it's coming), Alan
Hi Steve I see you have updated your article with another misrepresentation, so I will clarify.
The poster who you have quoted was suspended for 24 hours for misrepresenting the article and making personal accusations.
After 5 posts it was clear that the poster was there as a chaos agent and refused to read the article on which he was commenting. The final comment for which he received a 24 hour lock ("ban" in substack language) was:
"Yes I did, and according to my understanding of statistical analysis, Steve Kirsch's analysis, circumvented that possibility. If NZ had a sudden miraculous spike (no pun intended) in old people which would be an outlier in the Western world, so be it. But the data is the data isn't it? It seems to me that you are trying to prove a negative with a double negative? Let's first accept that the data shows a statistically significant excess death figure then work backwards. You are doing the opposite. And you seem also to believe that a 10% rate of excess deaths is insignificant compared to a 20% rate (which actually, according to the OECD average ofr Australia over the 2022/23 period was NOT the case). Perhaps if one of those 10% excess deaths was a member of your family, you might feel differently?"
The response was (following an number of politely answered responses) "What on earth are you talking about? The data shows a lower death rate. If you can't understand the content of the post we are happy to help you but when you completely misinterpret it because somebody told you to do so you will just get banned. I'll give you a 24 hours ban in order to give you time to read the article properly and come back with a rational argument instead of that."
After all the work I and others have done highlighting the dangers of mRNA therapy vaccines and the frauds behind them it is both disturbing and eye opening that posts are misrepresented in this fashion.
The post is still up at the below link but I do now intend to ban the user from the substack.
I just spent an hour on Steve's Telegram responding to OPENVEAT's position and as I was just about to hit the Send button, I was told I was prevented from doing so by Admin. WTF.
I showed that by using the shinyapp over at the HMD, you can see a weekly departure between expected and actual death rates in 2021 compared to 2020, coinciding with the rollout of the vaccines to the elderly. I believe OPENVEAT is correct when he says there were no excess deaths in 2021, but only if you are comparing to times with open borders, growing population and exposure of the elderly to winter challenge. All this changed in April of 2020 and continued well into 2022. If you assume that 2020 is your base year, then excess deaths are enormous from week 17 of 2021 onward. By playing with the parameters in the App, which uses weekly mortality figures from Stats NZ, you can see connections between the jab and death, but you have to put it in the correct context.
Thanks for having the balls to put your money where your mouth is Steve.
There's far too many big mouths out there claiming to be experts in understanding the data. If I were one of these experts and genuinely believed I could prove you wrong I'd be a fool not to take up your offer.
So for me... " You're the Man Steve " They can't truthfully believe in their own convictions and are definitely the children in the room until they can prove you wrong my friend.
when you say the: I will debunk these as needed. I'm also offering to bet $250K or more that the NZ data can be used with publicly available data to show that the COVID vaccines are killing people. Any takers??
so all I need to do is find another cause for the deaths and you will give me 250 k? Thats it?
the cause is the noble lie. Boom. You can keep your money cause I admire you.
It will be interesting to see if lots pop up with flat curves, aside from expected below average rates just after administration due to healthy user bias, implying that placebo lots were administered. That would be even a more damning smoking gun, evidence of mitigation of effects to maintain plausible deniability of deliberate mass murder (democide).
First they say the data is unusable, then they’ve said that they analyzed it and found nothing!!! You really can’t have it both ways.
In the first article, they’ve already discredited the analysis in their second article!!!
Did you notice that too?
Barry Young gets the "quote of the day award" Its harder to look than to leap. Its like he was staring into the maw of hell and could not take it anymore. Kiwis must be way too trusting to let this go on right under their nose and not be outraged. Weak people invite corrupt and evil government.
So what seems missing are parallel corroborating data such as ambulance call records, funeral home business data, casket sales, embalmer records such as turned up in the UK. And of course insurance company data. These data in NZ may be outside the Barry Young data set, but should be discoverable via other fairly reliable means. Any word on these yet? Any one looking. Seems we have been around this block before.
Technically there was no criminal intention and no harm done to anyone.. but top officials / vaxx machinators. Barry knew that data wasn't going to be released by (and with) following a long bureaucratic process. So far, have they analysed big chunk of missing data, that they still keep hidden? No, they did not. They are not in rush or want to memory hole all this. It's quite possible/probable that even more people will die, if analysis and conclusions are not provided, asap. That sudden deaths period is not over. Barry might, rightfully, excuse himself by explaining to the judge that fast release was crucial in order to prevent more deaths. Would you sue a good Samaritan, for an assault and bodily harm (breaking your hand), while pulling you from burning car crush. How is that any different.
Charged with: NZ Criminal Code Section 249 – Accessing computer system for dishonest purpose
Everyone is liable to imprisonment who accesses any computer system and obtains any property or advantage; or causes loss to any other person. https://incidentresponse.co.nz/computer-crimes-and-the-law/
- obtains any property or [he had a clearance to "obtain" or get, acquire, or secure every day]
- advantage; or [i.e. financial advantage, use it for his advantage, doesn't apply]
- causes loss to any other person. [no loss, no personal details released, data in pristine condition]
There is no mention in CC about RELEASING (that might be causing loss) of certain parts of such property to public (de facto owners). Only breached some part of his employment contract and already paid for it. Nothing criminal here.
In Dr Syed's article "Philadelphia 2023" I gently suggested he debate you in the comments. Good luck!
I was a paying subscriber to this substack for several months, however I decided to pay other substackers who almost certainly have fewer funds - Seth Keshel, Ian Brennan, and most recently, WelcomeTheEagle. Seth Keshel is an election integrity writer and Ian Brennan reports on matters relating to Kansas, especially Lawrence, from a conservative viewpoint. (Despite Kansas being a conservative state, all the big papers are liberal).
I also gave $25 to Steve's fund for a study into rates of COVID adverse events a year or so ago.
Thus I say, sigh. Also, I am a woman.
All of your posts make me wish I had become a statistician and a forensic accountant.
I have to keep reminding myself that the infighting and divisiveness is simply a reflection of the fact that every person senses him/herself uniquely, and this creates his/her very own external 'realities'. For men especially this is quite a big ego and grief to let go.
Love and gratitude, as always, and genuine peace and abundance (it's coming), Alan
Hi Steve I see you have updated your article with another misrepresentation, so I will clarify.
The poster who you have quoted was suspended for 24 hours for misrepresenting the article and making personal accusations.
After 5 posts it was clear that the poster was there as a chaos agent and refused to read the article on which he was commenting. The final comment for which he received a 24 hour lock ("ban" in substack language) was:
"Yes I did, and according to my understanding of statistical analysis, Steve Kirsch's analysis, circumvented that possibility. If NZ had a sudden miraculous spike (no pun intended) in old people which would be an outlier in the Western world, so be it. But the data is the data isn't it? It seems to me that you are trying to prove a negative with a double negative? Let's first accept that the data shows a statistically significant excess death figure then work backwards. You are doing the opposite. And you seem also to believe that a 10% rate of excess deaths is insignificant compared to a 20% rate (which actually, according to the OECD average ofr Australia over the 2022/23 period was NOT the case). Perhaps if one of those 10% excess deaths was a member of your family, you might feel differently?"
The response was (following an number of politely answered responses) "What on earth are you talking about? The data shows a lower death rate. If you can't understand the content of the post we are happy to help you but when you completely misinterpret it because somebody told you to do so you will just get banned. I'll give you a 24 hours ban in order to give you time to read the article properly and come back with a rational argument instead of that."
After all the work I and others have done highlighting the dangers of mRNA therapy vaccines and the frauds behind them it is both disturbing and eye opening that posts are misrepresented in this fashion.
The post is still up at the below link but I do now intend to ban the user from the substack.
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/the-new-zealand-whistleblower-data/comment/46141219
Is this a PEEPEE contest, to see who can OVERSTATE the most size? Very UNSAFE, very NOT unsafe?
"Barry Young who is now facing 7 years in prison for his actions"
For leaking real data? False data? Classified data that is real? Classified data that is false? I'm so confused.
I just spent an hour on Steve's Telegram responding to OPENVEAT's position and as I was just about to hit the Send button, I was told I was prevented from doing so by Admin. WTF.
I showed that by using the shinyapp over at the HMD, you can see a weekly departure between expected and actual death rates in 2021 compared to 2020, coinciding with the rollout of the vaccines to the elderly. I believe OPENVEAT is correct when he says there were no excess deaths in 2021, but only if you are comparing to times with open borders, growing population and exposure of the elderly to winter challenge. All this changed in April of 2020 and continued well into 2022. If you assume that 2020 is your base year, then excess deaths are enormous from week 17 of 2021 onward. By playing with the parameters in the App, which uses weekly mortality figures from Stats NZ, you can see connections between the jab and death, but you have to put it in the correct context.
https://mpidr.shinyapps.io/stmortality/
CDC: 143,233% Surge in Fatal Cancers Among Vaxxed Americans.
https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-143233-surge-fatal-cancers-among-vaxxed-americans/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-newsletter
Thanks for having the balls to put your money where your mouth is Steve.
There's far too many big mouths out there claiming to be experts in understanding the data. If I were one of these experts and genuinely believed I could prove you wrong I'd be a fool not to take up your offer.
So for me... " You're the Man Steve " They can't truthfully believe in their own convictions and are definitely the children in the room until they can prove you wrong my friend.
when you say the: I will debunk these as needed. I'm also offering to bet $250K or more that the NZ data can be used with publicly available data to show that the COVID vaccines are killing people. Any takers??
so all I need to do is find another cause for the deaths and you will give me 250 k? Thats it?
the cause is the noble lie. Boom. You can keep your money cause I admire you.
It will be interesting to see if lots pop up with flat curves, aside from expected below average rates just after administration due to healthy user bias, implying that placebo lots were administered. That would be even a more damning smoking gun, evidence of mitigation of effects to maintain plausible deniability of deliberate mass murder (democide).