Technically there was no criminal intention and no harm done to anyone.. but top officials / vaxx machinators. Barry knew that data wasn't going to be released by (and with) following a long bureaucratic process. So far, have they analysed big chunk of missing data, that they still keep hidden? No, they did not. They are not in rush or w…
Technically there was no criminal intention and no harm done to anyone.. but top officials / vaxx machinators. Barry knew that data wasn't going to be released by (and with) following a long bureaucratic process. So far, have they analysed big chunk of missing data, that they still keep hidden? No, they did not. They are not in rush or want to memory hole all this. It's quite possible/probable that even more people will die, if analysis and conclusions are not provided, asap. That sudden deaths period is not over. Barry might, rightfully, excuse himself by explaining to the judge that fast release was crucial in order to prevent more deaths. Would you sue a good Samaritan, for an assault and bodily harm (breaking your hand), while pulling you from burning car crush. How is that any different.
Charged with: NZ Criminal Code Section 249 – Accessing computer system for dishonest purpose
- obtains any property or [he had a clearance to "obtain" or get, acquire, or secure every day]
- advantage; or [i.e. financial advantage, use it for his advantage, doesn't apply]
- causes loss to any other person. [no loss, no personal details released, data in pristine condition]
There is no mention in CC about RELEASING (that might be causing loss) of certain parts of such property to public (de facto owners). Only breached some part of his employment contract and already paid for it. Nothing criminal here.
Technically there was no criminal intention and no harm done to anyone.. but top officials / vaxx machinators. Barry knew that data wasn't going to be released by (and with) following a long bureaucratic process. So far, have they analysed big chunk of missing data, that they still keep hidden? No, they did not. They are not in rush or want to memory hole all this. It's quite possible/probable that even more people will die, if analysis and conclusions are not provided, asap. That sudden deaths period is not over. Barry might, rightfully, excuse himself by explaining to the judge that fast release was crucial in order to prevent more deaths. Would you sue a good Samaritan, for an assault and bodily harm (breaking your hand), while pulling you from burning car crush. How is that any different.
Charged with: NZ Criminal Code Section 249 – Accessing computer system for dishonest purpose
Everyone is liable to imprisonment who accesses any computer system and obtains any property or advantage; or causes loss to any other person. https://incidentresponse.co.nz/computer-crimes-and-the-law/
- obtains any property or [he had a clearance to "obtain" or get, acquire, or secure every day]
- advantage; or [i.e. financial advantage, use it for his advantage, doesn't apply]
- causes loss to any other person. [no loss, no personal details released, data in pristine condition]
There is no mention in CC about RELEASING (that might be causing loss) of certain parts of such property to public (de facto owners). Only breached some part of his employment contract and already paid for it. Nothing criminal here.