The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are not homogenous, the unvaccinated tend to be less healthy on average as a demographic group. The difference between the two groups diminishes over time, though, which means that the vaccinated are dying at higher rates post vaccination (unless the unvaccinated somehow got healthier).
The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are not homogenous, the unvaccinated tend to be less healthy on average as a demographic group. The difference between the two groups diminishes over time, though, which means that the vaccinated are dying at higher rates post vaccination (unless the unvaccinated somehow got healthier).
Actually, the unvaccinated are younger and have less comorbidities on average, so it is not that simple.
But you are absolutely correct that you must account for these and any other confounders when comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated
Which is also true for comparing Moderna and Pfizer -- as shown above Moderna has 2x the comorbidity rate (even within age groups) and is older demographic -- the point Steve summarily ignores/rejects and relies on to make his "Moderna is a kill shot" claim
Naturally there are limitations to this method. But I haven't seen any data supporting this age distribution of moderna rollout idea you've got going there. In any case, this fiddling the figures here and FUDding them there will NEVER wash. Since, en contraire, there's plenty of other measures from other approaches supporting Steve's thesis here, some of which he cites also, cf VAERS figures, Kuhbandner (rollout/mortality correlation) or perhaps even Rancourt et al.'s most recent study of excess mortality. This is either the greatest catastrophe in the history of medicine, or the greatest crime in the known history of human civilization, depending on the degree of negligence.
What do you mean? The exact data base shared by the authors of the Czech paper modeled by Steve plainly show the shifted age distribution of Moderna recipients relative to Pfizer Recipients.
And as I've extensively documented in my previous work, Steve has no idea how to properly interpret VAERs data and his claims are completely erroreous as has been repeatedly demonstrated (and is contracted by other non-VAERs data including this Czech data set) and also for Rancourt -- his analyses use invalid analysis and interpretation and are fully dependent on his assumption that COVID-19 does not exist and did not kill anyone so he can reattribute all COVID-19 deaths to other sources, primarily vaccines, using post hoc ergo proptor hoc fallacious arguments.
It is not a catastrophe -- the vaccines helped tremendously in mitigating the impact COVID-19 would have had all over the world during the pandemic, sadly with minority harm in a very small proportion of individuals.
The problem is people like Steve who mislead others by misrepresenting data and making unsubstantiated claims that many believe, and those who believe his erroneous arguments are the only ones who claim it has been a catastrophe or crime.
false sport. we know moderna causes 3x the incidence of myocarditis as Pfizer. we also know moderna is 3x the dose of pfizer and shows a dose dependent cardiotoxicity. that moderna is more toxic and causes more death than pfizer is not a surprise... to anyone with 2 brain cells. try again.
The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups are not homogenous, the unvaccinated tend to be less healthy on average as a demographic group. The difference between the two groups diminishes over time, though, which means that the vaccinated are dying at higher rates post vaccination (unless the unvaccinated somehow got healthier).
Actually, the unvaccinated are younger and have less comorbidities on average, so it is not that simple.
But you are absolutely correct that you must account for these and any other confounders when comparing unvaccinated to vaccinated
Which is also true for comparing Moderna and Pfizer -- as shown above Moderna has 2x the comorbidity rate (even within age groups) and is older demographic -- the point Steve summarily ignores/rejects and relies on to make his "Moderna is a kill shot" claim
Naturally there are limitations to this method. But I haven't seen any data supporting this age distribution of moderna rollout idea you've got going there. In any case, this fiddling the figures here and FUDding them there will NEVER wash. Since, en contraire, there's plenty of other measures from other approaches supporting Steve's thesis here, some of which he cites also, cf VAERS figures, Kuhbandner (rollout/mortality correlation) or perhaps even Rancourt et al.'s most recent study of excess mortality. This is either the greatest catastrophe in the history of medicine, or the greatest crime in the known history of human civilization, depending on the degree of negligence.
What do you mean? The exact data base shared by the authors of the Czech paper modeled by Steve plainly show the shifted age distribution of Moderna recipients relative to Pfizer Recipients.
And as I've extensively documented in my previous work, Steve has no idea how to properly interpret VAERs data and his claims are completely erroreous as has been repeatedly demonstrated (and is contracted by other non-VAERs data including this Czech data set) and also for Rancourt -- his analyses use invalid analysis and interpretation and are fully dependent on his assumption that COVID-19 does not exist and did not kill anyone so he can reattribute all COVID-19 deaths to other sources, primarily vaccines, using post hoc ergo proptor hoc fallacious arguments.
It is not a catastrophe -- the vaccines helped tremendously in mitigating the impact COVID-19 would have had all over the world during the pandemic, sadly with minority harm in a very small proportion of individuals.
The problem is people like Steve who mislead others by misrepresenting data and making unsubstantiated claims that many believe, and those who believe his erroneous arguments are the only ones who claim it has been a catastrophe or crime.
false sport. we know moderna causes 3x the incidence of myocarditis as Pfizer. we also know moderna is 3x the dose of pfizer and shows a dose dependent cardiotoxicity. that moderna is more toxic and causes more death than pfizer is not a surprise... to anyone with 2 brain cells. try again.