What do you mean? The exact data base shared by the authors of the Czech paper modeled by Steve plainly show the shifted age distribution of Moderna recipients relative to Pfizer Recipients.
And as I've extensively documented in my previous work, Steve has no idea how to properly interpret VAERs data and his claims are completely erroreou…
What do you mean? The exact data base shared by the authors of the Czech paper modeled by Steve plainly show the shifted age distribution of Moderna recipients relative to Pfizer Recipients.
And as I've extensively documented in my previous work, Steve has no idea how to properly interpret VAERs data and his claims are completely erroreous as has been repeatedly demonstrated (and is contracted by other non-VAERs data including this Czech data set) and also for Rancourt -- his analyses use invalid analysis and interpretation and are fully dependent on his assumption that COVID-19 does not exist and did not kill anyone so he can reattribute all COVID-19 deaths to other sources, primarily vaccines, using post hoc ergo proptor hoc fallacious arguments.
It is not a catastrophe -- the vaccines helped tremendously in mitigating the impact COVID-19 would have had all over the world during the pandemic, sadly with minority harm in a very small proportion of individuals.
The problem is people like Steve who mislead others by misrepresenting data and making unsubstantiated claims that many believe, and those who believe his erroneous arguments are the only ones who claim it has been a catastrophe or crime.
false sport. we know moderna causes 3x the incidence of myocarditis as Pfizer. we also know moderna is 3x the dose of pfizer and shows a dose dependent cardiotoxicity. that moderna is more toxic and causes more death than pfizer is not a surprise... to anyone with 2 brain cells. try again.
What do you mean? The exact data base shared by the authors of the Czech paper modeled by Steve plainly show the shifted age distribution of Moderna recipients relative to Pfizer Recipients.
And as I've extensively documented in my previous work, Steve has no idea how to properly interpret VAERs data and his claims are completely erroreous as has been repeatedly demonstrated (and is contracted by other non-VAERs data including this Czech data set) and also for Rancourt -- his analyses use invalid analysis and interpretation and are fully dependent on his assumption that COVID-19 does not exist and did not kill anyone so he can reattribute all COVID-19 deaths to other sources, primarily vaccines, using post hoc ergo proptor hoc fallacious arguments.
It is not a catastrophe -- the vaccines helped tremendously in mitigating the impact COVID-19 would have had all over the world during the pandemic, sadly with minority harm in a very small proportion of individuals.
The problem is people like Steve who mislead others by misrepresenting data and making unsubstantiated claims that many believe, and those who believe his erroneous arguments are the only ones who claim it has been a catastrophe or crime.
false sport. we know moderna causes 3x the incidence of myocarditis as Pfizer. we also know moderna is 3x the dose of pfizer and shows a dose dependent cardiotoxicity. that moderna is more toxic and causes more death than pfizer is not a surprise... to anyone with 2 brain cells. try again.