438 Comments
тна Return to thread

Reply to this PINNED comment **ONLY** if you are accepting my challenge. You must supply all the requested information. All other replies to **THIS** comment will be deleted. As of Jun 14, there are still no takers. Come on folks. If you can show I'm wrong, it will boost your reputation!! But if you lose, well it's going to be really embarrassing, isn't it?

Expand full comment

My name is Anthony Colpo. I am approaching 3,000 subscribers/followers on Substack.

I have one peer-reviewed, English-language paper to my name on a biochemical/physiological health topic (the same number as you before your recent paper was questionably retracted), on the subject of cholesterol:

https://www.jpands.org/vol10no3/colpo.pdf

According to Google scholar, that one article has been cited by other authors 176 times - almost triple the number of your most widely-cited paper, yet my H-index is 3 (it was actually well over 7 before I removed all my non-peer reviewed web articles):

https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=Iow9P2oAAAAJ

If we only considered published papers pertaining to biochemistry/physiology topics, you too would fail to meet your own arbitrary H-index requirement.

My bio: I'm an autodidact that holds certifications in fitness training. I have no university qualifications (started sports science and law courses around a decade ago but dropped out in disgust - I don't make a good robot), but have easily and routinely outpointed those who do (for an example, see http://www.jpands.org/vol11no1/correspondence.pdf). When I sat the STAT test here in Australia over a decade ago, I was told I did better than 88% of the Australian population. So, even the system can't tell me I'm stupid because, by their own tertiary admission standards, I actually scrub up quite well. I've read literally thousands of journal papers and have published four books.

I agree with you that the vaxxxines are dangerous. I could have told you this well before you listened to all those commentators with the mass appeal you respect and got double Moderna'd.

My issue is with your recent claim that fluvoxamine is an effective 'COVID' treatment.

This is dangerously false, and I explain why in detail at the following links:

https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/fluvoxamine-a-toxic-and-potentially

https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/dear-steve-kirsch-fluvoxamine-is

I also left the following comment at the bottom of your fluvoxamine article:

https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/new-thailand-randomized-clinical?r=uhw5g&comments=true&commentId=51888752

I am happy to debate you on this. I'd also be more than happy for you to simply explain in writing why you praised fluvoxamine on the basis of a totally unblinded junk study sporting extremely suspicious withdrawal and clinical data, where one of the researchers has a clear vested financial interest in attaining favourable results?

Why did you gush over this study when previous double-blind and single-blind studies showed fluvoxamine to be a flop in treating 'COVID'?

Why are you giving praise to a problematic SSRI with a track record for causing nausea, agitation and suicidal behaviour?

Why are you praising fluvoxamine and the Thai study after clearly having done so little background research on the drug and the researchers involved?

How did you miss the obvious and glaring anomalies in the study?

Did you read the paper for yourself, or did you rely on the opinion of your scientific friends you "trust," something you often do as you admitted in your article asserting that Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated?

I eagerly await your response. You can DM me through Substack.

Expand full comment

"My issue is with your recent claim that fluvoxamine is an effective 'COVID' treatment.

This is dangerously false"

Mechanistically, fluvoxamine is a mast cell stabilizer. So it will help prevent severe COVID. For short term use as in COVID infection, not sure if side effects such as suicidal behavior come into play.

https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/covid-19-severity-is-a-result-of

Expand full comment

So you are now recommending taking fluvoxamine to *prevent* COVID, rather than just to treat it?

All wankery about mast cells and cytokine storms etc etc aside, there is ZERO evidence to show the highly toxic fluvoxamine "will help prevent severe COVID" (which is regular cold and flu rebranded).

And it has repeatedly failed in clinical trials to treat 'COVID.'

"For short term use as in COVID infection, not sure if side effects such as suicidal behavior come into play."

Well if you're not sure, you should stop talking it up. Peak suicide risk for these toxic SSRIs is first 28 days after commencement, after dosage change, and first 28 days after cessation.

While there is NO evidence in real live human beings to show fluvoxamine successfully treats renamed colds and flu, there is plenty of evidence to show it increases everything from nausea to suicide risk.

I'd suggest living a healthy lifestyle and avoiding getting run down if you want to avoid serious colds and flu, rather than toxic drugs.

For your edification:

https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/133818533

https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/142683704

https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/a-message-to-the-vaccinated-you-got-screwed-part-1

https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/the-official-covid-19-death-toll-is-a-big-fat-fraud

Expand full comment

I heard about the error you got and asked Substack - they gave me this:

https://imgur.com/loy0953.jpg

If you still have that problem give Substack more info at https://substack.com/support

Expand full comment