Reply to this PINNED comment **ONLY** if you are accepting my challenge. You must supply all the requested information. All other replies to **THIS** comment will be deleted. As of Jun 14, there are still no takers. Come on folks. If you can show I'm wrong, it will boost your reputation!! But if you lose, well it's going to be really embarrassing, isn't it?
My name is Anthony Colpo. I am approaching 3,000 subscribers/followers on Substack.
I have one peer-reviewed, English-language paper to my name on a biochemical/physiological health topic (the same number as you before your recent paper was questionably retracted), on the subject of cholesterol:
According to Google scholar, that one article has been cited by other authors 176 times - almost triple the number of your most widely-cited paper, yet my H-index is 3 (it was actually well over 7 before I removed all my non-peer reviewed web articles):
If we only considered published papers pertaining to biochemistry/physiology topics, you too would fail to meet your own arbitrary H-index requirement.
My bio: I'm an autodidact that holds certifications in fitness training. I have no university qualifications (started sports science and law courses around a decade ago but dropped out in disgust - I don't make a good robot), but have easily and routinely outpointed those who do (for an example, see http://www.jpands.org/vol11no1/correspondence.pdf). When I sat the STAT test here in Australia over a decade ago, I was told I did better than 88% of the Australian population. So, even the system can't tell me I'm stupid because, by their own tertiary admission standards, I actually scrub up quite well. I've read literally thousands of journal papers and have published four books.
I agree with you that the vaxxxines are dangerous. I could have told you this well before you listened to all those commentators with the mass appeal you respect and got double Moderna'd.
My issue is with your recent claim that fluvoxamine is an effective 'COVID' treatment.
This is dangerously false, and I explain why in detail at the following links:
I am happy to debate you on this. I'd also be more than happy for you to simply explain in writing why you praised fluvoxamine on the basis of a totally unblinded junk study sporting extremely suspicious withdrawal and clinical data, where one of the researchers has a clear vested financial interest in attaining favourable results?
Why did you gush over this study when previous double-blind and single-blind studies showed fluvoxamine to be a flop in treating 'COVID'?
Why are you giving praise to a problematic SSRI with a track record for causing nausea, agitation and suicidal behaviour?
Why are you praising fluvoxamine and the Thai study after clearly having done so little background research on the drug and the researchers involved?
How did you miss the obvious and glaring anomalies in the study?
Did you read the paper for yourself, or did you rely on the opinion of your scientific friends you "trust," something you often do as you admitted in your article asserting that Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated?
I eagerly await your response. You can DM me through Substack.
"My issue is with your recent claim that fluvoxamine is an effective 'COVID' treatment.
This is dangerously false"
Mechanistically, fluvoxamine is a mast cell stabilizer. So it will help prevent severe COVID. For short term use as in COVID infection, not sure if side effects such as suicidal behavior come into play.
So you are now recommending taking fluvoxamine to *prevent* COVID, rather than just to treat it?
All wankery about mast cells and cytokine storms etc etc aside, there is ZERO evidence to show the highly toxic fluvoxamine "will help prevent severe COVID" (which is regular cold and flu rebranded).
And it has repeatedly failed in clinical trials to treat 'COVID.'
"For short term use as in COVID infection, not sure if side effects such as suicidal behavior come into play."
Well if you're not sure, you should stop talking it up. Peak suicide risk for these toxic SSRIs is first 28 days after commencement, after dosage change, and first 28 days after cessation.
While there is NO evidence in real live human beings to show fluvoxamine successfully treats renamed colds and flu, there is plenty of evidence to show it increases everything from nausea to suicide risk.
I'd suggest living a healthy lifestyle and avoiding getting run down if you want to avoid serious colds and flu, rather than toxic drugs.
You say the virus exists? What exactly do you mean? Are you saying it is a "contagion"? What you said here "The COVID virus exists and you can order it from ATCC and match the GenBank sequence" is correct, but out of context of reality. The sequence is patented and 100% invented. I hate to watch you singing from their hymn book on viruses in your otherwise great interviews. This is a copy paste from some of my online stuff, I wrote every word of it. So, you have not DEFINED what a virus is, you have not proven a virus has EVER been isolated, how could you be so confused???
VIROLOGY IS A THREE PART SCAM!
#1 DEAD CELL MIXTURE
The way virologists go about "proving" they have detected "a virus" is fraudulent and unscientific. A TOTAL SCAM! If viruses were a thing, they would be easily detected in and directly isolated from the blood or sputum, by Gel Electrophoresis — is a laboratory method used to separate mixtures of DNA, RNA, or proteins according to their sizes — which is avoided by virologists, the CDC, the WHO, and government stooges! So, instead of using this legitimate method of direct detection, virologists invented an indirect fraudulent method, using monkey kidney cells in a petri dish in the lab. To this they add toxic chemicals, and contaminants (antibiotics and other sources of genetic material from cows in addition to the monkey kidney already there) which causes the monkey cells to die — this is the cytopathic effect or CPE — and into this contaminated mixture of dead and dying cells they add the alleged "virus containing snot" (additional genetic contamination because of all the junk in the snot like bacteria and fungi etc.) — and say that the observed cytopathic effect is caused by a virus! In the sample! Completely ignoring the fact that they killed the cells PRIOR TO adding the sample! — They call it "activation", they must "activate" the cells ahead of time before adding the sample! — And that is supposed to be "proof of a virus"? Ya right! — A TOTAL SCAM!
# 2 PICTURES
From this initial "proof", they take pictures of the junk from the mixture, with an electron microscope and point to a few cherry-picked images of weird shapes and claim that they have photographed "a virus". (Which you will learn below is fragments of dead cells.) What a joke!!!!! — A TOTAL SCAM!
#3 PATENTED TEMPLATE
Step three is to "sequence the genome" of the nonexistent virus. To do this — they use a computer program that builds a Frankenstein virus from the contaminated mixture — it does this by matching pieces of DNA in the mixture to a patented (by Bill Gates) template of genetic sequences!!!— A TOTAL SCAM!
CONTROL EXPERIMENT ENDS VIROLOGY
So, let's see how EASY IT IS to expose this three part scam! In two words: CONTROL EXPERIMENT. The control experiment is the cornerstone of legitimacy in science. In this case, to claim that the cytopathic effect (CPE) indicates the presence of a virus, you must rule out all other possible causes, which in this case means to run the experiment without adding the alleged "virus containing sample" and see if the results are the same or different, without the sample. It turns out the results are THE SAME, WITH OR WITHOUT THE SAMPLE. The same cytopathic effect (CPE), the same pictures with the electron microscope, and you can use any template, to pull out any virus you want, from a single dead cell mixture.
I am certainly open to debating malicious incompetence with respect to big pharma products. MRNA implementation is certainly malicious, otherwise they would have been stopped by now. We should be grateful that big pharma has not achieved competency.
5. H-index: Proof you have an h-index >= 7 - When I worked on research in the lab of the late Professor Harry Rubin at the University of California, Berkeley, I did not put my name on any papers printed using the results. Similarly, in two Hebrew texts on the Torah’s Divine Guidance for all mankind that I have published, my name does not appear. Please consider that the h-index criteria propagates the Cult of Experts, giving value to only one narrow measure, excluding most human beings with something valuable to say. Access to these publications requires participation in the editorial and peer scheme. Some of the authors you champion had their works removed and would have a zero h-index rating. Other authors have high scores and nothing valuable or true to say. You are setting the rules so you can keep this rule, but I urge you to reconsider. My writings have positively affected hundreds of thousands of lives around the world, for example, this article printed here https://www.passaicclarity.org/covid-lies/ which was republished from here https://matzav.com/exposing-the-lies-weve-been-told-about-covid-shutting-shuls-supposed-upticks-and-more/.
I posted a challenge from the Substack app - it showed up in my Notes but not here, so I will retry replying here from the web browser. I apologize if it eventually appears here twice.
Thank you Thank you Thank you!! This is so exciting. The upside of health that we are on the verge of witnessing is incredible.
Have come across many amazing pieces of info in the past 3 years....... these are just 2 of them .... just a glimpse of how much good health is ahead, once we know that the information we currently have has been limited by those protecting status quo extreme profit monopolies, and we know to look for all of the information .......... thank you!!!
page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's (a 40 year researcher on vitamin D) published in his 2010 book, "The Vitamin D Solution" ...................... "For some, even physicians, it's incomprehensible that vitamin D can reduce the risk of heart attack by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of common cancers of the colon, prostate, and breast by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of infections [typo in book? infectious?) diseases, including influenza, by as much as 90 percent; reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes by 78 percent in a child who gets 2000 IU of vitamin D a day in the first year of life; decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes; decrease the risk of dementia and depression; wipe out cases of fibromyalgia that have been misdiagnosed; and dramatically decrease the risk of multiple sclerosis and other auto-immune diseases. When in doubt, I always go back to this simple fact; every tissue and cell in the body has a vitamin D receptor." end of excerpt from page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's book "The Vitamin D Solution".
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, April 22, 2005
Vitamin C Saves Lives
Millions die each year from heart disease and stroke, and the overwhelming evidence is that vitamin C supplementation would save many lives.
Two-time Nobel Prize winner Dr. Linus Pauling estimated that the rate of heart disease would be reduced by 80 per cent if adults in the US supplemented with 2,000 to 3,000 mg of vitamin C each day. According to Dr. Pauling, "Since vitamin C deficiency is the common cause of human heart disease, vitamin C supplementation is the universal treatment for this disease."[1] Heart disease is the number one killer in the US. For those with existing heart disease Dr. Pauling said that blockage of heart arteries could actually be reversed by supplementing with 6,000 of vitamin C and 6,000 of lysine (a common amino acid) taken in divided doses throughout the day. Vitamin C supplementation both lowers serum cholesterol levels and repairs lesions of arterial walls. 1998 Nobel Prize winner Dr. Louis J. Ignarro found that supplementing with vitamin C and vitamin E significantly reduces the risk of developing arteriosclerosis.[2]
A study examined vitamin E and vitamin C supplement use in relation to mortality risk in 11,178 persons aged 67-105 who participated in the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly over a nine year period.[3] Simultaneous use of vitamins E and C was associated with a lower risk of total mortality and coronary mortality after adjusting for alcohol use, smoking history, aspirin use, and medical conditions.
A landmark study following over 85,000 nurses over a 16-year period for a total of 1,240,000 person-years found that vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced the risk of heart disease.[4] Intake of vitamin C from foods alone was insufficient to significantly effect the rate of heart disease. High quantities of vitamin C from supplements was essential to provide the protective effects. The study adjusted for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors."
This is off topic, but there is new censorship on Obama Phones.
The URL is locked, and the company they use allegedly keeps you safe by removing the choice to go forward on a Google warning, and force you " back to safety" from , for instance, Ron Unz.
Got to admit its getting worse/, it's getting worse all the time/ Getting so much worse all the time!
The UK government, in their latest COVID inquiry convened by the courts, has unknowingly opened a can of worms. The investigation was sparked by allegations that then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his administration ordered lockdowns and self-distancing while following none of the government's own policies.
The fact is that this inquiry will demand that all data and assertions made regarding COVID will now have to be MADE PUBLIC and will be reviewed and SCRUTINIZED IN COURT, and could be a game changer on the entire topic of vaccines and Covid!
To be honest, Prime Minister Boris Johnson never advocated for lockdowns, mask mandates, or the enforcement of any claims of a true pandemic. Obviously, he had been provided information people were not privvy to, while the public had to endure 24/7 media hysteria paid for by Big Pharma.
The Prime Monster had maintained that statistics showed that the infections appeared to be a risk only to the elderly, like any flu season.
Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (despite having no education, job experience, or background in any of these disciplines), is the one responsible for the vaccine drives, lockdowns and the constant pressures for more lockdowns, and wanted a medival punishment system for vaccine-hesitant people.
Hi Steve, I can invite you as an expert witness to my upcoming hearing in Washington State as the Washington Medical Commission charged me and is recommending to put my license on probation due to prescribing ivermectin off label for covid prophylaxis for patients not willing to get the "shot" . They will have their own state "expert" witness and can debate with their "expert" witness about the rationale for alternative COVID preventive measures instead of the mRNA shot. We can bring up the death statistics from the COVID shot vs death statistics from IVM or HCQ in WA state and nationwide. I think this will be a great way to show in court the evidence and can create a legal precedent and record instead of having a social media debate.
Ivermectin is not COVID-19 prophylaxis based on journal papers. The anti-parasitic drug failed RCTs in preventing COVID-19 infection. HCQ is also anti-parasitic and not anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 is far deadlier than vaccines, which rarely cause severe adverse events.
You need help, the European Medical Agency released a 393 page confidential report from pfizer submitted to them from June 2022. They must submit these to that agency every 6 months so we are still waiting on the last one to be released. Daniel Horowitz read it on Steve Deace, two credible people in media. Their own studies confirm 10k different categories of side effects with over 1.6 million severe adverse events. A 35% rate. They used 3x the amount of women in the study to try and make the results look better but that didn’t help. 92% had no co-morbidities so that is absolute proof their issues came after the shot. Keep drinking the kool-aid, one day we won’t have to deal with people like you that just believe what they are told instead of looking into it.
I used it myself and as someone who bowels can be an issue, it’s amazing how overnight they were back to a normal discharge. We all know parasites combined with toxins and radiation are killing us. But like anything it’s in moderation, people in Africa take it weekly not sure that can be too healthy since it still is a big pharma product. I prefer Dr Hazel Parcells method for cleaning out toxins. Salts as our ancestors always knew to use, hence the salt baths.
Well, that is great, as well as bad news. It is great in that people are realizing that this world is here through the action of Deity, to whom we are all responsible. It is bad news if those people are randomly seeking "religions", including perverted Christianity, since God never said that he is going to save religions. Beginning with Genesis, and going through 66 books, written by multiple authors over several thousand years, he has outlined a definite plan through which he has chosen to redeem but a few people, namely those who seek him, listen to him with humility and understanding, and then devote their lives to following his instructions. It is a choice that we all have, and the most critical one that we will face. Christianity is an "all embracing" term for religions that profess to follow Jesus, but who do so according to their own preferences, biases, limited knowledge, with wrong motivations, as well as some who diligently study the scriptures with honesty and desire to know what God wants. To know the truth requires personal honesty, humility, and a deep desire to uncover it, with willingness to suffer adverse consequences.
Part of this word misinformation has do with the concept of "reality" and "perception management" The tv, internet search engines and social media try to alter reality and the way people perceive things. All are heavily censored and biased. Use any mainline search engine and it will show links that vaccines are all safe and have saved humanity. Yet this is medically nonfactual and Orwellian misinformation.
Up to 2015 the internet was basically uncensored as long as you did incite violence or post child Porn. In 2016 the CIA along with google perfected the algorithms to censor internet searches to control all information and opinions. All my decisions are made independently after self-reflection. The TV, social media mean nothing to me. I rely on intuition and my education and past life experiences.
I hear that, my own wife who is a stay at home mom has turned over to pagan beliefs and will say such things as time doesn’t exist but will say time travel is possible. Illogical people are so hard to deal with. Pray for me as I will for all here
I think intuition is a wonderful guide probably the most reliable if it has been developed but our culture poopoohs it so it doesn't get developed. The entire sleazy luring to mask and take the vaccine should have been a huge red flag to everyone concerned. If someone claims "misinformation" then that requires a discussion and support for the claim not just making an accusation giving no right of reply. I don't understand how people accept such ridiculous standards.
How very true. My problem is that I do not have enough faith to be an atheist. And it sure requires a lot of blind faith to be one, since no logic can support it.
I have been on these forums for 3 months since I retired. It may shock you that as terrible as the covid operation has been, it has resulted in an untold number of atheists turning to various religions, mainly Christianity. Many reasons for this but I meet recent ex atheists all the time now. Not just comments on these forums, but at Starbucks, at the dog park etc.
Cathy, that was my mom’s name. I too believe what is wrong is a spiritual sickness and that the only real “feeling safe” comes from finding remedy to existential fears
Reply to this PINNED comment **ONLY** if you are accepting my challenge. You must supply all the requested information. All other replies to **THIS** comment will be deleted. As of Jun 14, there are still no takers. Come on folks. If you can show I'm wrong, it will boost your reputation!! But if you lose, well it's going to be really embarrassing, isn't it?
My name is Anthony Colpo. I am approaching 3,000 subscribers/followers on Substack.
I have one peer-reviewed, English-language paper to my name on a biochemical/physiological health topic (the same number as you before your recent paper was questionably retracted), on the subject of cholesterol:
https://www.jpands.org/vol10no3/colpo.pdf
According to Google scholar, that one article has been cited by other authors 176 times - almost triple the number of your most widely-cited paper, yet my H-index is 3 (it was actually well over 7 before I removed all my non-peer reviewed web articles):
https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=Iow9P2oAAAAJ
If we only considered published papers pertaining to biochemistry/physiology topics, you too would fail to meet your own arbitrary H-index requirement.
My bio: I'm an autodidact that holds certifications in fitness training. I have no university qualifications (started sports science and law courses around a decade ago but dropped out in disgust - I don't make a good robot), but have easily and routinely outpointed those who do (for an example, see http://www.jpands.org/vol11no1/correspondence.pdf). When I sat the STAT test here in Australia over a decade ago, I was told I did better than 88% of the Australian population. So, even the system can't tell me I'm stupid because, by their own tertiary admission standards, I actually scrub up quite well. I've read literally thousands of journal papers and have published four books.
I agree with you that the vaxxxines are dangerous. I could have told you this well before you listened to all those commentators with the mass appeal you respect and got double Moderna'd.
My issue is with your recent claim that fluvoxamine is an effective 'COVID' treatment.
This is dangerously false, and I explain why in detail at the following links:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/fluvoxamine-a-toxic-and-potentially
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/dear-steve-kirsch-fluvoxamine-is
I also left the following comment at the bottom of your fluvoxamine article:
https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/new-thailand-randomized-clinical?r=uhw5g&comments=true&commentId=51888752
I am happy to debate you on this. I'd also be more than happy for you to simply explain in writing why you praised fluvoxamine on the basis of a totally unblinded junk study sporting extremely suspicious withdrawal and clinical data, where one of the researchers has a clear vested financial interest in attaining favourable results?
Why did you gush over this study when previous double-blind and single-blind studies showed fluvoxamine to be a flop in treating 'COVID'?
Why are you giving praise to a problematic SSRI with a track record for causing nausea, agitation and suicidal behaviour?
Why are you praising fluvoxamine and the Thai study after clearly having done so little background research on the drug and the researchers involved?
How did you miss the obvious and glaring anomalies in the study?
Did you read the paper for yourself, or did you rely on the opinion of your scientific friends you "trust," something you often do as you admitted in your article asserting that Sars-Cov-2 has been isolated?
I eagerly await your response. You can DM me through Substack.
"My issue is with your recent claim that fluvoxamine is an effective 'COVID' treatment.
This is dangerously false"
Mechanistically, fluvoxamine is a mast cell stabilizer. So it will help prevent severe COVID. For short term use as in COVID infection, not sure if side effects such as suicidal behavior come into play.
https://vinuarumugham.substack.com/p/covid-19-severity-is-a-result-of
So you are now recommending taking fluvoxamine to *prevent* COVID, rather than just to treat it?
All wankery about mast cells and cytokine storms etc etc aside, there is ZERO evidence to show the highly toxic fluvoxamine "will help prevent severe COVID" (which is regular cold and flu rebranded).
And it has repeatedly failed in clinical trials to treat 'COVID.'
"For short term use as in COVID infection, not sure if side effects such as suicidal behavior come into play."
Well if you're not sure, you should stop talking it up. Peak suicide risk for these toxic SSRIs is first 28 days after commencement, after dosage change, and first 28 days after cessation.
While there is NO evidence in real live human beings to show fluvoxamine successfully treats renamed colds and flu, there is plenty of evidence to show it increases everything from nausea to suicide risk.
I'd suggest living a healthy lifestyle and avoiding getting run down if you want to avoid serious colds and flu, rather than toxic drugs.
For your edification:
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/133818533
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/publish/posts/detail/142683704
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/a-message-to-the-vaccinated-you-got-screwed-part-1
https://anthonycolpo.substack.com/p/the-official-covid-19-death-toll-is-a-big-fat-fraud
I heard about the error you got and asked Substack - they gave me this:
https://imgur.com/loy0953.jpg
If you still have that problem give Substack more info at https://substack.com/support
You say the virus exists? What exactly do you mean? Are you saying it is a "contagion"? What you said here "The COVID virus exists and you can order it from ATCC and match the GenBank sequence" is correct, but out of context of reality. The sequence is patented and 100% invented. I hate to watch you singing from their hymn book on viruses in your otherwise great interviews. This is a copy paste from some of my online stuff, I wrote every word of it. So, you have not DEFINED what a virus is, you have not proven a virus has EVER been isolated, how could you be so confused???
VIROLOGY IS A THREE PART SCAM!
#1 DEAD CELL MIXTURE
The way virologists go about "proving" they have detected "a virus" is fraudulent and unscientific. A TOTAL SCAM! If viruses were a thing, they would be easily detected in and directly isolated from the blood or sputum, by Gel Electrophoresis — is a laboratory method used to separate mixtures of DNA, RNA, or proteins according to their sizes — which is avoided by virologists, the CDC, the WHO, and government stooges! So, instead of using this legitimate method of direct detection, virologists invented an indirect fraudulent method, using monkey kidney cells in a petri dish in the lab. To this they add toxic chemicals, and contaminants (antibiotics and other sources of genetic material from cows in addition to the monkey kidney already there) which causes the monkey cells to die — this is the cytopathic effect or CPE — and into this contaminated mixture of dead and dying cells they add the alleged "virus containing snot" (additional genetic contamination because of all the junk in the snot like bacteria and fungi etc.) — and say that the observed cytopathic effect is caused by a virus! In the sample! Completely ignoring the fact that they killed the cells PRIOR TO adding the sample! — They call it "activation", they must "activate" the cells ahead of time before adding the sample! — And that is supposed to be "proof of a virus"? Ya right! — A TOTAL SCAM!
# 2 PICTURES
From this initial "proof", they take pictures of the junk from the mixture, with an electron microscope and point to a few cherry-picked images of weird shapes and claim that they have photographed "a virus". (Which you will learn below is fragments of dead cells.) What a joke!!!!! — A TOTAL SCAM!
#3 PATENTED TEMPLATE
Step three is to "sequence the genome" of the nonexistent virus. To do this — they use a computer program that builds a Frankenstein virus from the contaminated mixture — it does this by matching pieces of DNA in the mixture to a patented (by Bill Gates) template of genetic sequences!!!— A TOTAL SCAM!
CONTROL EXPERIMENT ENDS VIROLOGY
So, let's see how EASY IT IS to expose this three part scam! In two words: CONTROL EXPERIMENT. The control experiment is the cornerstone of legitimacy in science. In this case, to claim that the cytopathic effect (CPE) indicates the presence of a virus, you must rule out all other possible causes, which in this case means to run the experiment without adding the alleged "virus containing sample" and see if the results are the same or different, without the sample. It turns out the results are THE SAME, WITH OR WITHOUT THE SAMPLE. The same cytopathic effect (CPE), the same pictures with the electron microscope, and you can use any template, to pull out any virus you want, from a single dead cell mixture.
I am certainly open to debating malicious incompetence with respect to big pharma products. MRNA implementation is certainly malicious, otherwise they would have been stopped by now. We should be grateful that big pharma has not achieved competency.
Steve:
Here is another debate idea.
A debate on quaxx "safety."
Challenge Dr. Hotez to debate YOU.
Recently, Hotez refused to debate RFK - because RFK is not a scientist.
Subsequently, Dr. McCullough stepped up.
But Hotez also refused to debate McCullough.
Dan
"Just the fact that nobody with minimal qualifications will even register here to challenge me tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?"
Only people with sub-minimal qualifications register to debate?
But no qualified people register to debate?
Hmmm ...
Mr. Steve Kirsch, I challenge you to a debate and respond to your criteria as follows:
1. Name: Rabbi Yitzchok Dovid Smith
2. Content: email me through Substack or @edavidsmith on Twitter
3. Followers: over 11,000 subscribers on Rabbismith.Substack.com
4. Bio: https://www.passaicclarity.org/about/
5. H-index: Proof you have an h-index >= 7 - When I worked on research in the lab of the late Professor Harry Rubin at the University of California, Berkeley, I did not put my name on any papers printed using the results. Similarly, in two Hebrew texts on the Torah’s Divine Guidance for all mankind that I have published, my name does not appear. Please consider that the h-index criteria propagates the Cult of Experts, giving value to only one narrow measure, excluding most human beings with something valuable to say. Access to these publications requires participation in the editorial and peer scheme. Some of the authors you champion had their works removed and would have a zero h-index rating. Other authors have high scores and nothing valuable or true to say. You are setting the rules so you can keep this rule, but I urge you to reconsider. My writings have positively affected hundreds of thousands of lives around the world, for example, this article printed here https://www.passaicclarity.org/covid-lies/ which was republished from here https://matzav.com/exposing-the-lies-weve-been-told-about-covid-shutting-shuls-supposed-upticks-and-more/.
6. Topic: The specific topic I want to challenge you on is your statements in your article here https://open.substack.com/pub/stevekirsch/p/bu-creates-new-sars-cov-2-strain?r=1m3xzf&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post as addressed in my article here: https://open.substack.com/pub/rabbismith/p/expose-the-chinese-lab-theory-gain?r=1m3xzf&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
With blessings, thank you.
I posted a challenge from the Substack app - it showed up in my Notes but not here, so I will retry replying here from the web browser. I apologize if it eventually appears here twice.
Thank you Thank you Thank you!! This is so exciting. The upside of health that we are on the verge of witnessing is incredible.
Have come across many amazing pieces of info in the past 3 years....... these are just 2 of them .... just a glimpse of how much good health is ahead, once we know that the information we currently have has been limited by those protecting status quo extreme profit monopolies, and we know to look for all of the information .......... thank you!!!
1. ************************************************
page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's (a 40 year researcher on vitamin D) published in his 2010 book, "The Vitamin D Solution" ...................... "For some, even physicians, it's incomprehensible that vitamin D can reduce the risk of heart attack by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of common cancers of the colon, prostate, and breast by as much as 50 percent; reduce the risk of infections [typo in book? infectious?) diseases, including influenza, by as much as 90 percent; reduce the risk of type 1 diabetes by 78 percent in a child who gets 2000 IU of vitamin D a day in the first year of life; decrease the risk of type 2 diabetes; decrease the risk of dementia and depression; wipe out cases of fibromyalgia that have been misdiagnosed; and dramatically decrease the risk of multiple sclerosis and other auto-immune diseases. When in doubt, I always go back to this simple fact; every tissue and cell in the body has a vitamin D receptor." end of excerpt from page 245-246 of Dr. Michael Holick's book "The Vitamin D Solution".
2. ********************************************************
http://www.orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v01n02.shtml
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, April 22, 2005
Vitamin C Saves Lives
Millions die each year from heart disease and stroke, and the overwhelming evidence is that vitamin C supplementation would save many lives.
Two-time Nobel Prize winner Dr. Linus Pauling estimated that the rate of heart disease would be reduced by 80 per cent if adults in the US supplemented with 2,000 to 3,000 mg of vitamin C each day. According to Dr. Pauling, "Since vitamin C deficiency is the common cause of human heart disease, vitamin C supplementation is the universal treatment for this disease."[1] Heart disease is the number one killer in the US. For those with existing heart disease Dr. Pauling said that blockage of heart arteries could actually be reversed by supplementing with 6,000 of vitamin C and 6,000 of lysine (a common amino acid) taken in divided doses throughout the day. Vitamin C supplementation both lowers serum cholesterol levels and repairs lesions of arterial walls. 1998 Nobel Prize winner Dr. Louis J. Ignarro found that supplementing with vitamin C and vitamin E significantly reduces the risk of developing arteriosclerosis.[2]
A study examined vitamin E and vitamin C supplement use in relation to mortality risk in 11,178 persons aged 67-105 who participated in the Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly over a nine year period.[3] Simultaneous use of vitamins E and C was associated with a lower risk of total mortality and coronary mortality after adjusting for alcohol use, smoking history, aspirin use, and medical conditions.
A landmark study following over 85,000 nurses over a 16-year period for a total of 1,240,000 person-years found that vitamin C supplementation significantly reduced the risk of heart disease.[4] Intake of vitamin C from foods alone was insufficient to significantly effect the rate of heart disease. High quantities of vitamin C from supplements was essential to provide the protective effects. The study adjusted for age, smoking, and a variety of other coronary risk factors."
This is off topic, but there is new censorship on Obama Phones.
The URL is locked, and the company they use allegedly keeps you safe by removing the choice to go forward on a Google warning, and force you " back to safety" from , for instance, Ron Unz.
Got to admit its getting worse/, it's getting worse all the time/ Getting so much worse all the time!
( Sung to the tube of the Beatles
" Getting Better).
The UK Covid Inquiry will be streaming live....
https://www.youtube.com/@UKCovid-19Inquiry
The UK government, in their latest COVID inquiry convened by the courts, has unknowingly opened a can of worms. The investigation was sparked by allegations that then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his administration ordered lockdowns and self-distancing while following none of the government's own policies.
The fact is that this inquiry will demand that all data and assertions made regarding COVID will now have to be MADE PUBLIC and will be reviewed and SCRUTINIZED IN COURT, and could be a game changer on the entire topic of vaccines and Covid!
To be honest, Prime Minister Boris Johnson never advocated for lockdowns, mask mandates, or the enforcement of any claims of a true pandemic. Obviously, he had been provided information people were not privvy to, while the public had to endure 24/7 media hysteria paid for by Big Pharma.
The Prime Monster had maintained that statistics showed that the infections appeared to be a risk only to the elderly, like any flu season.
Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care (despite having no education, job experience, or background in any of these disciplines), is the one responsible for the vaccine drives, lockdowns and the constant pressures for more lockdowns, and wanted a medival punishment system for vaccine-hesitant people.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12189373/UK-not-prepared-pandemic-Covid-inquiry-hears.html
Hi Steve, I can invite you as an expert witness to my upcoming hearing in Washington State as the Washington Medical Commission charged me and is recommending to put my license on probation due to prescribing ivermectin off label for covid prophylaxis for patients not willing to get the "shot" . They will have their own state "expert" witness and can debate with their "expert" witness about the rationale for alternative COVID preventive measures instead of the mRNA shot. We can bring up the death statistics from the COVID shot vs death statistics from IVM or HCQ in WA state and nationwide. I think this will be a great way to show in court the evidence and can create a legal precedent and record instead of having a social media debate.
Ivermectin is not COVID-19 prophylaxis based on journal papers. The anti-parasitic drug failed RCTs in preventing COVID-19 infection. HCQ is also anti-parasitic and not anti-viral against SARS-CoV-2. COVID-19 is far deadlier than vaccines, which rarely cause severe adverse events.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9215332/
You need help, the European Medical Agency released a 393 page confidential report from pfizer submitted to them from June 2022. They must submit these to that agency every 6 months so we are still waiting on the last one to be released. Daniel Horowitz read it on Steve Deace, two credible people in media. Their own studies confirm 10k different categories of side effects with over 1.6 million severe adverse events. A 35% rate. They used 3x the amount of women in the study to try and make the results look better but that didn’t help. 92% had no co-morbidities so that is absolute proof their issues came after the shot. Keep drinking the kool-aid, one day we won’t have to deal with people like you that just believe what they are told instead of looking into it.
your both wrong, viruses do not exist novirus.ca i challenge anyone to prove otherwise
Will share a few studies
1. This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study showing effectiveness
https://www.medincell.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/PR-results-TTG-VF-EN.pdf
2. This other below is a large prospective, observational study
https://www.cureus.com/articles/82162-ivermectin-prophylaxis-used-for-covid-19-a-citywide-prospective-observational-study-of-223128-subjects-using-propensity-score-matching#!/
3. Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/fulltext/2021/06000/review_of_the_emerging_evidence_demonstrating_the.4.aspx
These studies showing effectiveness on IVM for COVID prophylaxis
I used it myself and as someone who bowels can be an issue, it’s amazing how overnight they were back to a normal discharge. We all know parasites combined with toxins and radiation are killing us. But like anything it’s in moderation, people in Africa take it weekly not sure that can be too healthy since it still is a big pharma product. I prefer Dr Hazel Parcells method for cleaning out toxins. Salts as our ancestors always knew to use, hence the salt baths.
Well, that is great, as well as bad news. It is great in that people are realizing that this world is here through the action of Deity, to whom we are all responsible. It is bad news if those people are randomly seeking "religions", including perverted Christianity, since God never said that he is going to save religions. Beginning with Genesis, and going through 66 books, written by multiple authors over several thousand years, he has outlined a definite plan through which he has chosen to redeem but a few people, namely those who seek him, listen to him with humility and understanding, and then devote their lives to following his instructions. It is a choice that we all have, and the most critical one that we will face. Christianity is an "all embracing" term for religions that profess to follow Jesus, but who do so according to their own preferences, biases, limited knowledge, with wrong motivations, as well as some who diligently study the scriptures with honesty and desire to know what God wants. To know the truth requires personal honesty, humility, and a deep desire to uncover it, with willingness to suffer adverse consequences.
This talk of misinformation being deadly is making people out to be ignoramuses and can't think for themselves or question things themselves.
Part of this word misinformation has do with the concept of "reality" and "perception management" The tv, internet search engines and social media try to alter reality and the way people perceive things. All are heavily censored and biased. Use any mainline search engine and it will show links that vaccines are all safe and have saved humanity. Yet this is medically nonfactual and Orwellian misinformation.
Up to 2015 the internet was basically uncensored as long as you did incite violence or post child Porn. In 2016 the CIA along with google perfected the algorithms to censor internet searches to control all information and opinions. All my decisions are made independently after self-reflection. The TV, social media mean nothing to me. I rely on intuition and my education and past life experiences.
I hear that, my own wife who is a stay at home mom has turned over to pagan beliefs and will say such things as time doesn’t exist but will say time travel is possible. Illogical people are so hard to deal with. Pray for me as I will for all here
I think intuition is a wonderful guide probably the most reliable if it has been developed but our culture poopoohs it so it doesn't get developed. The entire sleazy luring to mask and take the vaccine should have been a huge red flag to everyone concerned. If someone claims "misinformation" then that requires a discussion and support for the claim not just making an accusation giving no right of reply. I don't understand how people accept such ridiculous standards.
How very true. My problem is that I do not have enough faith to be an atheist. And it sure requires a lot of blind faith to be one, since no logic can support it.
I have been on these forums for 3 months since I retired. It may shock you that as terrible as the covid operation has been, it has resulted in an untold number of atheists turning to various religions, mainly Christianity. Many reasons for this but I meet recent ex atheists all the time now. Not just comments on these forums, but at Starbucks, at the dog park etc.
Cathy, that was my mom’s name. I too believe what is wrong is a spiritual sickness and that the only real “feeling safe” comes from finding remedy to existential fears
This sums it up.
https://americasbestpics.com/picture/how-unusual-they-entrust-the-management-of-their-health-to-SHmrWDZ59