The trolls hate my Twitter polls because these polls invariably confirm what I claim. Are they right to claim these polls have no scientific value? No, and here's why.
STEVE IT IS OUTSTANDING THAT YOUR MATHS IS EXCELLENT AND CAN SHOW ALL THE FLAWED NUMBERS IN SURVEYS. PLEASE KEEP THE GREAT WORK UP AS YOU ARE WINNING AND THEY ARE JUST BAD LOOSESR WHO JUST WILL NOT OWN UP TO IT.
I'm not a troll, I follow and appreciate your work. Surly the people that follow you on Twitter are like me. So it does lean towards a confirmation bias. Although, there is info that can be had from the samples, probably not so much on overall numbers though.
Your polls are information to be digested with all other like information. The "pandemic" has exposed our own Government as the single largest player in data obfuscation, censorship and misinformation. In light of that how could your poll data be any less important than that issued by Government ?
Same with SIDS. It tends to cluster after vaccination. And astonishingly, the case controls in the 1990s had large samples of infants who died prior to vaccination, the majority were under 2 months of age, and this skewed the overall results and gave an illusory protection of vaccines against SIDS when it could not be ascribed to be protective as the infants died prior to being age eligible for vaccination. But if an infant lived long enough for vaccination, they were more likely to die and cluster after vaccination, especially the 2 month shots. The signal was stronger for infants who lacked the classical risk factors of SIDS, ie. Prematurity, low socio economic, not low birth weight.
Without a definition of suddenly it's hard to know what this data even means, let alone what selection biases that condition "If... suddenly" creates. It would be better just to ask the relative time before or after vaccination that autism symptoms (diagnosed later no doubt) first presented. Then the question would match the interpretation you're placing on the answers. As it stands - who knows?
Hi Steve. I hope you read my comment because this could be a reason so many parents allow peds to push them to follow the childhood vax schedule. I know because it happened with my daughter and unfortunately she has allowed so far. First off my grandson was unfortunately given the hep b after birth. I spoke to her about my concerns with so many children getting autism. I explained that I’m not saying never get vaccines but that too many are given at one time and to at the very least spread out and only give him the ones most important. She decided she wanted to spread them out and then eliminate certain ones. She talked to pediatrician and he told her that her son could not be a patient there if the schedule was not followed. He said it wasn’t his decision but his office is part of Atrium Health and that is the “rule”. She loves her pediatrician but his hands are tied. It seems as though most systems are like that now because Novant demands the same from what I understand. I would love to know from your readers if other parents have experienced this. Unfortunately she has so far followed the schedule and he will soon be due for his one year shots. It sickens me. So far he seems fine but I know that can change. Fortunately she has not allowed the flu or covid shots and does not intend to. I would love for her to change to naturopathic ped.
The skew in days after the vaccine seems like solid evidence of causation. The fact that there are no reports of sudden autism the day before vaccination I believe could be explained by parents not wanting to jab their child one day after the symptoms have appeared, so I’m not sure that’s any indication of causation.
I'm not persuaded by how you eliminate recall bias and other forms of selection bias or cognitive bias. Maybe I'm dim. Regardless, I agree such polls are useful for identifying interesting signals for further investigation. Particularly when the real data is locked away to protect what may well be just a contrary bias.
Despite all the destruction and mayhem that the response to sars-cov2 did (as opposed to the virus itself) one of the best things to come out of this mess is the exposure of the pharma-political-academic complex. So many cans of worms to open.
Steve, Twitter polls are not at all reliable and will always be skewed towards the views of your own followers. There's a poll out at the moment that shows that most people think that the Earth is flat. How scientific is that?
Aren't there also medical experts who have identified HOW vaccines cause autism? I think I've read about that somewhere (maybe here?)
STEVE IT IS OUTSTANDING THAT YOUR MATHS IS EXCELLENT AND CAN SHOW ALL THE FLAWED NUMBERS IN SURVEYS. PLEASE KEEP THE GREAT WORK UP AS YOU ARE WINNING AND THEY ARE JUST BAD LOOSESR WHO JUST WILL NOT OWN UP TO IT.
I'm not a troll, I follow and appreciate your work. Surly the people that follow you on Twitter are like me. So it does lean towards a confirmation bias. Although, there is info that can be had from the samples, probably not so much on overall numbers though.
if your still a demonicrat your a communist
Your polls are information to be digested with all other like information. The "pandemic" has exposed our own Government as the single largest player in data obfuscation, censorship and misinformation. In light of that how could your poll data be any less important than that issued by Government ?
>Why my informal Twitter polls are so valuable<
This will help make your argument - I just came across this:
"CDC Altered Minnesota Death Certificates that List a Covid Vaccine as a Cause of Death"
https://brownstone.org/articles/cdc-altered-death-certificates/
Is the "Excess Deaths" altered also? That's been used a lot in trying to figure out what has actually been going on.
What ISN'T altered to protect the pharma money machine?
Same with SIDS. It tends to cluster after vaccination. And astonishingly, the case controls in the 1990s had large samples of infants who died prior to vaccination, the majority were under 2 months of age, and this skewed the overall results and gave an illusory protection of vaccines against SIDS when it could not be ascribed to be protective as the infants died prior to being age eligible for vaccination. But if an infant lived long enough for vaccination, they were more likely to die and cluster after vaccination, especially the 2 month shots. The signal was stronger for infants who lacked the classical risk factors of SIDS, ie. Prematurity, low socio economic, not low birth weight.
I love your work!💓
Without a definition of suddenly it's hard to know what this data even means, let alone what selection biases that condition "If... suddenly" creates. It would be better just to ask the relative time before or after vaccination that autism symptoms (diagnosed later no doubt) first presented. Then the question would match the interpretation you're placing on the answers. As it stands - who knows?
Need to start to talk about Vaccine caused injuries and deaths!!
Aneurysm Takes Life Of Bodybuilding Influencer Jo Lindner At Age 30 – Evidence Suggests COVID Shot Had Something To Do With It.
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/aneurysm-takes-life-of-bodybuilding-influencer-jo-lindner-at-age-30-evidence-suggests-covid-shot-had-something-to-do-with-it/?utm_source=OneSource&utm_medium=Push
Here is a question. What do the Big Pharma companies care if your child gets their vax? What does Steve care? What does either have to gain? Or lose?
Hi Steve. I hope you read my comment because this could be a reason so many parents allow peds to push them to follow the childhood vax schedule. I know because it happened with my daughter and unfortunately she has allowed so far. First off my grandson was unfortunately given the hep b after birth. I spoke to her about my concerns with so many children getting autism. I explained that I’m not saying never get vaccines but that too many are given at one time and to at the very least spread out and only give him the ones most important. She decided she wanted to spread them out and then eliminate certain ones. She talked to pediatrician and he told her that her son could not be a patient there if the schedule was not followed. He said it wasn’t his decision but his office is part of Atrium Health and that is the “rule”. She loves her pediatrician but his hands are tied. It seems as though most systems are like that now because Novant demands the same from what I understand. I would love to know from your readers if other parents have experienced this. Unfortunately she has so far followed the schedule and he will soon be due for his one year shots. It sickens me. So far he seems fine but I know that can change. Fortunately she has not allowed the flu or covid shots and does not intend to. I would love for her to change to naturopathic ped.
The skew in days after the vaccine seems like solid evidence of causation. The fact that there are no reports of sudden autism the day before vaccination I believe could be explained by parents not wanting to jab their child one day after the symptoms have appeared, so I’m not sure that’s any indication of causation.
I'm not persuaded by how you eliminate recall bias and other forms of selection bias or cognitive bias. Maybe I'm dim. Regardless, I agree such polls are useful for identifying interesting signals for further investigation. Particularly when the real data is locked away to protect what may well be just a contrary bias.
Despite all the destruction and mayhem that the response to sars-cov2 did (as opposed to the virus itself) one of the best things to come out of this mess is the exposure of the pharma-political-academic complex. So many cans of worms to open.
Steve, Twitter polls are not at all reliable and will always be skewed towards the views of your own followers. There's a poll out at the moment that shows that most people think that the Earth is flat. How scientific is that?