Where is the study in the US using record-level data showing that kids who are fully vaccinated die less? According to AI, no such study exists. Vaccine mandates are all based on belief, not science.
In CA. all children in public schools are mandated to receive a growing list of vaccines- clearly you are not from CA and were not subjected to all their mandates during the COVID fiasco.
Neonatal tetanus is a rare condition which happens in countries where home deliveries by traditional birth attendants take place, with plasters on the ombilical cord cut made of soil, sometimes cow dung. I doubt this kind of practice takes place in the US. Thus this article is irrelevant as an answer to your question.
Besides, neonatal tetanus if I remember correctly is not prevented by the neonates immunity but by the MOTHERS’
Steve. We see much of your effort has been proving causality of harm through KCOR statistical analysis of record level data (if you can get it). This is a great but hard since the variables are so many and and the analysis technical and abstruse. Perhaps another productive line of attack might be to look into the science that supposedly proves the existence of viruses. Instead of trying to prove that harm and lack of effectiveness of vaccines exist through epidemiology why not attempt to prove that viruses do not exist in reality? Here you would be proving a negative and not a positive, which seems to me, at least, to be the easier of the two things. A quick read of Plotkin's book reveals the so called science of virology is replete with assumptions, experiments that can't be replicated and all the rest. If epidemiology is a questionable science then virology is at the very least worse. I am sure a scientist of your intelligence and stature could quickly get to the core of this and demonstrate that those who say viruses exist are basing that belief not on science but on circular wishful thinking. The advantage being if viruses can be shown to be fake the whole of the vaccine house of cards falls without the need for complex mathematical analysis of records however truthful and useful that may be.
STEVE :IMPOSSIBLE TO SAVE ANY LIVES BECAUSE IT NEVER WAS A VACCINE AS I HAVE OFTEN STATED. THIS FACT DOES NOT SINK IT. WHY DID IT NOT SAVE LIVES IN FACT MURDERD AND INJURED. THOSE JABBERD CAUGHT COVID MORE OFTEN THAN NOT. IT WAS A JAB DEVELOPED BY THER CIA AS A BIOLOGICAT WEAPON. IT ALTERS OUR GENETIC CODE. THE JAB WAS SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM. IT CONTAINED A SPIKE PROTIEN THAT REPROGUSES ITSELF FOR YEARS AND NOT IN THE BODY IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE EVIDENCE IS OVERWELMING. IT NEVER EVER SAVED ANY LIVES. .WHAT SAVED LIVES WAS NATURAL IMMUNITY. THE TRUE CONCLOUSION IS A FACT AND THAT IS THAT THE JAB DESTROYED LIVES NOT SAVED THEM. .NATURAL IMMUNITY WAS DESTROYED BY THE JAB SO ANOTHER PROOF IT DID NOT SAVE LIVES. IT WAS JUST A TOXIC JAB SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM +++++
The question that you ask is in the same family of questions: "Why can't someone show me the study that proves the Universe came into existence purely by coincidence? Why can't someone show me a study that proves that life on earth came as the result of electrochemical forces acting in a chance event?"
The answer to all of those questions is "Because no such study exists, and if one does, it proves the opposite of what it seeks to prove".
What you are definitely proving is that liars abound, people who have no personal honesty or courage. Such people's existence is not much above that of an animal.
I am not at all sure that I understand your comment. If you dislike mine, please give reasons that explain a bit more than HaHa, and I will tell you all about the earth being flat.
hmm maybe your right. I suppose it would be easier to do studies on 'vaccines' than on the origins of the universe so I confused you with one of those flat earth 'vaxxers'. If you do think the earth is flat then you must get on ok with the 'vaxxers' or doesn't the common ground help?
Baya, I don't know where you are coming from. I have not had a vaccine since my induction into the army, which was over 65 years ago, and yes, I am an antivaxxer. But the origin of the Universe has been propagandized by alleged science to have been all sorts of ridiculous ideas, none of which can be researched, speculated, investigated or proposed, according to real science, because the origin is from God. What did I say that gave you the hallucination that I am a flat earther?
This is interesting https://www.facebook.com/share/v/14VyJeDzM2J/
MALONE IS A NITWIT.
MANDATE SMANDATE.
NOBODY FORCED.
DON'T TRY REWRITING HISTORY.
In CA. all children in public schools are mandated to receive a growing list of vaccines- clearly you are not from CA and were not subjected to all their mandates during the COVID fiasco.
YIU can keep on with that word mandate, however, you've been hoodwinked into thinking a mandate is something you have to participate in
And for the record, Ma'am, I've been at the fence battling since I saw a bunch confused ppl wearing masks in March of '20.
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO GIVE YR CHILDREN SHOTS. YOU ARE A PARENT, IF IT MATTERS TO YOU, AND IT SHOULD, YOU WORK IT OUT, HOWEVER YOU HAVE TO.
THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB YOU HAVE IS TO RAISE A HEALTHY SEMI WELL ADJUSTED PERSON TO GO OFF INTO THE WORLD.
IF THATS NORMT PPLS GOAL,
THEN THEY SKIP CHILDREN.
NOT ACCESSORIES.
LOOK AROUND.
THE SCHOOL MAY HAVE A RULE, THEN THAT ISNT THE SCHOOL FOR CHILDREN WHOSE PARENTS CARE ABOUT HEALTHY CHILDREN.
THEY DON'T EXIST. FURTHERMORE IT IS UNETHECAL TO TEST ON BABIES. THAT OUGHT TO TELL YALL ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW
Because they know these are lies.
Because they don’t
Hi, I was given this in an argument as proof that "vaccines" saved lives:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2842305
Steve Kirsch has already addressed this study:
New French study claims vaccines reduced COVID deaths by 75% and were associated with a 25% reduction in non-COVID ACM. Here are the flaws.
https://kirschsubstack.com/p/new-jama-paper-claim-vaccines-reduced
Thank you so much! I guess I did the mistake of googling for any comments on it, also, Grok wasn't much of use here, not that I expected it to be...
Try alter.systems AI, it's different.
I meant neonates immunization, not “immunity”
Neonatal tetanus is a rare condition which happens in countries where home deliveries by traditional birth attendants take place, with plasters on the ombilical cord cut made of soil, sometimes cow dung. I doubt this kind of practice takes place in the US. Thus this article is irrelevant as an answer to your question.
Besides, neonatal tetanus if I remember correctly is not prevented by the neonates immunity but by the MOTHERS’
https://support.substack.com/hc/en-us/articles/4415086956436-Can-I-edit-my-comment-on-a-Substack-post
Steve. We see much of your effort has been proving causality of harm through KCOR statistical analysis of record level data (if you can get it). This is a great but hard since the variables are so many and and the analysis technical and abstruse. Perhaps another productive line of attack might be to look into the science that supposedly proves the existence of viruses. Instead of trying to prove that harm and lack of effectiveness of vaccines exist through epidemiology why not attempt to prove that viruses do not exist in reality? Here you would be proving a negative and not a positive, which seems to me, at least, to be the easier of the two things. A quick read of Plotkin's book reveals the so called science of virology is replete with assumptions, experiments that can't be replicated and all the rest. If epidemiology is a questionable science then virology is at the very least worse. I am sure a scientist of your intelligence and stature could quickly get to the core of this and demonstrate that those who say viruses exist are basing that belief not on science but on circular wishful thinking. The advantage being if viruses can be shown to be fake the whole of the vaccine house of cards falls without the need for complex mathematical analysis of records however truthful and useful that may be.
STEVE :IMPOSSIBLE TO SAVE ANY LIVES BECAUSE IT NEVER WAS A VACCINE AS I HAVE OFTEN STATED. THIS FACT DOES NOT SINK IT. WHY DID IT NOT SAVE LIVES IN FACT MURDERD AND INJURED. THOSE JABBERD CAUGHT COVID MORE OFTEN THAN NOT. IT WAS A JAB DEVELOPED BY THER CIA AS A BIOLOGICAT WEAPON. IT ALTERS OUR GENETIC CODE. THE JAB WAS SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM. IT CONTAINED A SPIKE PROTIEN THAT REPROGUSES ITSELF FOR YEARS AND NOT IN THE BODY IN THE FIRST PLACE. THE EVIDENCE IS OVERWELMING. IT NEVER EVER SAVED ANY LIVES. .WHAT SAVED LIVES WAS NATURAL IMMUNITY. THE TRUE CONCLOUSION IS A FACT AND THAT IS THAT THE JAB DESTROYED LIVES NOT SAVED THEM. .NATURAL IMMUNITY WAS DESTROYED BY THE JAB SO ANOTHER PROOF IT DID NOT SAVE LIVES. IT WAS JUST A TOXIC JAB SIMILAR TO SNAKE VENOM +++++
I believe this article is addressing the childhood vaccines schedule, not Covid shots specifically, but your screaming point is taken.
I suppose it is (kind of) fast, fast, fast... slow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntueYuZ8r94
***So why are states mandating vaccines **
Because the corrupt drug companies are still in charge.
Same reason as why Ivermectin is still "banned" in most areas and ALL of Canada.
The question that you ask is in the same family of questions: "Why can't someone show me the study that proves the Universe came into existence purely by coincidence? Why can't someone show me a study that proves that life on earth came as the result of electrochemical forces acting in a chance event?"
The answer to all of those questions is "Because no such study exists, and if one does, it proves the opposite of what it seeks to prove".
What you are definitely proving is that liars abound, people who have no personal honesty or courage. Such people's existence is not much above that of an animal.
Haha. Tell us the one about the earth being flat.
I am not at all sure that I understand your comment. If you dislike mine, please give reasons that explain a bit more than HaHa, and I will tell you all about the earth being flat.
hmm maybe your right. I suppose it would be easier to do studies on 'vaccines' than on the origins of the universe so I confused you with one of those flat earth 'vaxxers'. If you do think the earth is flat then you must get on ok with the 'vaxxers' or doesn't the common ground help?
Baya, I don't know where you are coming from. I have not had a vaccine since my induction into the army, which was over 65 years ago, and yes, I am an antivaxxer. But the origin of the Universe has been propagandized by alleged science to have been all sorts of ridiculous ideas, none of which can be researched, speculated, investigated or proposed, according to real science, because the origin is from God. What did I say that gave you the hallucination that I am a flat earther?
I stand corrected. My apologies Peter. It looks like I did manage to stump Jeff Levin-Scherz, MD MBA FACP
"@employercoverage
Harvard Chan School of Public Health: Ass't Prof. WTW: Population Health Leader. Published in the HBR, JAMA, Journal of General Internal Medicine, CEO.net, CFO.com, The Hill & HRExecutive. VIEWS MY OWN." https://employercoverage.substack.com/p/flu-and-tdap-vaccinations-in-pregnancy/comment/199382927?utm_source=activity_item#comment-199390447?utm_source=activity_item
You stump me too, and a few others who are following this discourse to nowhere. so I am not going to continue it from this end.
I believe there cannot be any actual real honest studies that vaccines save lives. It’s just the opposite!
THERE ISN'T..YOU PPL DIDNT BOTHER TO LOOK.
Of cause there isn’t, but they won’t talk about that fact!
In the big picture, in developed nations, they don’t. Maybe some, which is why an individualized risk benefit analysis should be the default position.
I would say these studies you seek are in the same archive as the NASA moon landing technology/records. The DNE bin?