42 Comments
User's avatar
Carol's avatar

No I am not. But showing support for people we believe are doing good work can only be a good thing. They get little enough thanks. Anyway, I am ending this conversation now if you don't mind.

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

A good question! Thank you. Now, interrogating any honest AI at a more fundamental level in the thought process. Using *clinical diagnoses...

Where is the study showing that a disease is spread by a microbe from a sick person to a healthy person?

A good start is "Can You Catch A Cold?" published in 2024. A review of 203 experiments that failed to demonstrate contagion other than by the nocebo effect (you expect to catch it so you come down with symptoms).

These research papers, many flawed and uncontrolled, cover well over 100 years of experiments and include large scale "Spanish Flu" experiments in the USA and the UK Common Cold Research Unit which used 43 year's worth of taxpayer's money to

-Never prove transmission

-Never find a virus

-Never develop a preventative injection

-Never find a cure

The term "Corona virus" came from these UK geniuses who took images of contaminated samples without using "well" controls. They were actually looking at monkey kidney cells breaking down as has been pointed out by nephrologists.

*i.e. not using silly surrogate tests like PCR.

Expand full comment
Dan Star's avatar

Why? It’s intentional!

Expand full comment
David O'Halloran's avatar

Steve. No such study exist because it cannot exist. How could anybody ever establish that fewer people died than would otherwise have done so if some other factor did not happen? This is retrospective negative causation - "it would have been worse if we hadn't". it is not possible to know as we do not have alternative reality time line machines. vaccine pushers accept "saved million of lives" but deny the McDowell triplets actual deaths? What events over the last five years, and your work in particular, show us is that science is no longer an established body of factual knowledge about the real world it is a religion used to control people and profit from their behavior.

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

You would first have to show that disease is transmitted from one person to another. We know that this happens via nocebo (bone pointing and delusional thinking) but there are no controlled scientific experiments proving contagion.

Expand full comment
Nigel King's avatar

Keep going until population beliefs are shattered. My children do not yet believe that this and AGW are scams and they are nearly 50!

Expand full comment
Lauren Ayers's avatar

How about giving us the URL for that CDC 2017 study showing vaccination does NOT save lives. I'd like to share that with my doctor.

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

Give the doctor a copy of "Can You Catch A Cold?", "Virus Mania" and "What Really Makes You Ill".

Expand full comment
KT-SunWillShineAgain's avatar

Injecting foreign substances made up of toxins has never worked except as a huge profit making business with zero liability in the USA.

Expand full comment
Eric Fuleftists's avatar

Does Mr. Kirsch think he's been making progress in convincing both the masses and TPTB of Covid vaxxine harm? On a scale of 1 to 10, how does he rate himself in terms of being effective? Has he made any effort to sit down and discuss both KCOR and all the rest with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., possibly the only man in America with the power to actually make any kind of change in US medical policies and perceptions?

Expand full comment
Carol's avatar

I imagine he has Eric. But we need to understand the constraints under which people like RFK operate. Most people I know have done nada. zip. zilch. zero about anything. Too lazy to lift a finger. So I commend you for your input. But please do give credit where it's due. We are trying to push a stone uphill and Kirsch has done much to advance this progress. Thank-you.

Expand full comment
Eric Fuleftists's avatar

So are you spokesthing for Mr. Kirsch? If not, then why are you responding? Idle speculation ultimately amounts to nothing but hopium.

Expand full comment
Suzsanna's avatar

Our natural immune system is the best for fighting off disease.

Expand full comment
DDR Dave's avatar

There is no "immune system". There are healthy people who eat well, enjoy the outdoors, avoid poisons (including injections, alcohol and pharma) and get their sleep - then there are the unhealthy people (especially the injected ones).

We have complex mechanisms for removal of foreign substances and damage repair but we don't "fight" disease. The whole antibody charade started to fall apart during AIDS. Rather than specific to a particular "antigen", the "antibody" proteins turn out to be promiscuous. I recommend "What Really Makes You Ill". It's extensive but easy to understand and well referenced.

Expand full comment
Username's avatar
3hEdited

What are the chances Secretary Kennedy or one of his fantastic hires will analyze U.S. deaths attributed to "Covid" to see how deadly it really was? I seem to recall reading at some point that the CDC had defined Covid infections/deaths differently from influenza, such that Covid was made to look much more dangerous than the flu, thus feeding the panic. IIRC, the idea was that if we defined all of these diseases the same way (apples to apples), "Covid" deaths would drop by like five-sixths, making it not all that different from influenza.

And of course, this would tip the risk-assessment scales against the Covid shots that much more.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

There's a snowballs chance in hell that Secretary Kennedy or one of his underlings will conduct that analysis. If one of them did then Bourla, Bancel, Gates and Xi would all stop paying Bobby and POTUS.

Expand full comment
Ralph's avatar

There are plenty of studies proving that more vaccines improve the profits of Pharma, which they share with the politicians and media who push their lies.

Also, the vaccine schedule is a RECOMMENDATION, so that makes an even more powerful question as to why states make a recommendation mandatory. I smell a profit motive; always follow the money!

Expand full comment
Suzsanna's avatar

There is nothing better than your own natural immune system.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

POTUS Trump, Bobby, Bill Gates, Albert Bourla and Stefan Bancel disagree. Trump mRNA death shots are better, according to them.

Expand full comment
joyce berman's avatar

Everything I've been seeing recently, reports of studies and even studies of groups of studies, has shown that the risk to children is greater from the vaccine than from Covid-19 and its mutations. And this year's flu shot has apparently completely missed the variant that's most common, at least in the U.S..

Expand full comment
Kathy Stewart's avatar

You are awesome, Steve Kirsch!

Expand full comment
Ellen's avatar

The irony js that we are mocked for “belief”!

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

I asked ChatGPT: "Are there U.S. studies using individual-level (record-level) data comparing outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people that show fewer deaths among the vaccinated? Answer 'yes' or 'no,' and as if you were your programmer under oath with penalties for perjury." ChatGPT answered:

"Yes, there are U.S. studies using individual-level (record-level) data comparing outcomes of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated people that show fewer deaths among the vaccinated.

To be precise about what exists vs. what does not exist:

✔ Yes — there are record-level cohort studies in the U.S.

These studies use individual medical records or linked databases to compare mortality outcomes by vaccination status:

• A large cohort analysis using the U.S. Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) compared vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals and found lower non-COVID mortality among vaccinated persons after adjusting for age, sex, and other factors.

• This is individual-level data from health records across multiple integrated healthcare systems.

• Hospital-based cohort studies using patient-level electronic health records (EHRs) have found lower in-hospital mortality in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated COVID-19 patients using matched comparisons (propensity matching)."

Expand full comment
Lauren Ayers's avatar

Did ChatGPT take into account that a person is considered "nonvaccinated" for two weeks after their shot? That time span is when a lot of deaths occur from the body's reaction to a vaccine.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

ChatGPT is programmed to repeat POTUS Trump's claim that the Trump mRNA death shots saved millions of lives. The reasoning for this is that the bigger the claim is and the more often it is repeated the more the rubes will believe it.

Expand full comment
Genazzano's avatar

The bottom line is we do not need the vaccine and we we not created to have it

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

If what you say is correct, why are POTUS Trump and Bobby still rolling it out when almost one year of Trump admin v2.0 is almost over? Perhaps POTUS and Bobby believe that a Gates depopulation agenda to cull useless eaters is what the US needs.

Expand full comment
Ralph's avatar

The truth is that Pharma has so poisoned and corrupted the whole industry that RFK is already at high risk from corrupt politicians on both sides of the house.

Both he and DJT know that they must move very cautiously, or their whole program will be derailed.

It's a disgusting indictment of the whole system, and kudos to Steve and the other brave warriors fighting it!

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

The Trump mRNA death shots are the signature acievement of POTUS Trump's first term. They will be stopped but not until POTUS' second term is over and he and Bobby no longer have influence.

Expand full comment
Ralph's avatar

Trump has already acknowledged that in his first term he was badly misled by people he had been told were trustworthy, and with the benefit of hindsight he would do many things differently!

As I said, they all know that they are treading in a minefield and they have to act very cautiously. It’s extremely frustrating, but hat the truth about the corrupt system that has evolved.

Expand full comment
AwakeNotWoke's avatar

You are correct that he was an easy mark for con artists who needed a sucker who could be easily manipulated in order for them to be able to pull off their scam. Heis in deep now so it makes perfect sense now for him to continue going along with the scam by continuing to roll out shots. There are plenty more useless eaters to replace the ones he and his puppet masters bump off.

Expand full comment
Sheila Wise's avatar

Because vaccines don't save lives!

In the days of George Washington, vaccines were applied by a thread, dipped into the pustular of an infected person and insert it into a small slice in the skin. This is much different than injecting crap; old DNA from who knows where, aluminum, mercury, etc. into humans and calling it a vaccine.

Expand full comment