Why can't anyone show us the study showing vaccines save lives?
Where is the study in the US using record-level data showing that kids who are fully vaccinated die less? According to AI, no such study exists. Vaccine mandates are all based on belief, not science.
There are really bad studies using modelling data claiming vaccines save lives, but the models assume vaccines don’t kill people.
Where is the study, using US record-level data, showing the US childhoo d vaccine schedule save lives? I couldn’t find it because no such study exists.
Grok and ChatGPT couldn’t find such a study either (see below).
What I did find is the CDC 2017 study showing vaccination does NOT save lives.
Where is the credible study in the US using record-level data showing that kids who are fully vaccinated die less than there under-vaccinated peers?
According to AlterAI, there is no such study:
Which raises the question
So why are states mandating vaccines if there no such study? At a minimum they should notify the public that the policy is based 100% on belief and not science.
Please share with your friends. Maybe they can help answer my question.
Addendum 1/13/26
I posted a link to my article above on X.
Dr. Neil Stone responded to my post claiming there are many such studies and they are easy to find.
After I pointed out that none of his followers found such a study,
Neil offered a meta analysis of tetanus shots given OUTSIDE the US as the single best study to justify mass vaccinating kids in the US!!!
Whoa. Not US. Not record level data. Only one proxy RCT analyzed days 4–14 deaths (Bangladesh), not true ACM!!!
That’s his BEST paper to justify mass vaccination of kids in the US saves lives.
What does THAT tell you???
It tells me that he doesn’t have any papers to back up his belief that mass vaccinating kids in the US saves lives.
He posted his best evidence in two places:
and re-posted again here:
This failed all the criteria I identified in my article above:
US data
Record-level data
Credible study
Shows fully vaccinated kids in the US have statistically significant lower ACM than kids who are not fully vaccinated per the US schedule
The 2017 CDC VSD study meets all these criteria except it didn’t show a benefit! Which was my point. When they do the study, they can’t show a mortality benefit. There is no such study showing otherwise. We can’t find it because it doesn’t exist except in the MINDS of people like Dr. Neil Stone.
I pointed out the errors to Neil and gave him a second chance.
Grok couldn’t find a study meeting the criteria I set either. Grok admitted no such study exists.
The entire US childhood vaccination schedule is based on the belief that it will save lives, not actually data. There aren’t any studies using record-level US data showing a mortality benefit from mass vaccination in the US. Not a single one.
Grok admits that there are no credible studies using U.S. record level data that demonstrate that our mass childhood vaccination program in the US saves any lives.
ChatGPT 4.2 searched for 16 minutes. No study justifying mass vaccination of US kids.
Shouldn’t we do the study and get the data before we mandate mass vaccinate of our kids?
That’s my question.
Hopefully, "Professor Dave" will enlighten us with his wisdom on this :)
The Amish and Mennonites. About 400K and 600K respectively. The Amish do not vaccinate, the Mennonites rarely.
This is fairly simple. What percentage of these populations contract Diphtheria, Whooping cough, Measles, Tuberculous, Polio, Mumps, Rubella etc. etc.
Some data would be nice. But we absolutely know, if the rates were high it would be front page news every day. The media would ostracize and lay blame on these communities, worse than the Covid unvaccinated.
The data already exists, why isn't it published? We know why.