2017 CDC study shows there is no scientific rationale for vaccine mandates for kids attending school
Not that science will change anything, but people who think they are "saving lives" with vaccine mandates for kids to attend school are both delusional and anti-science.
Here’s the CDC’s VSD study of kids and mortality:
The results
Conclusion: Although there were few deaths, our results do not indicate a difference in risk of all-cause mortality among fully vaccinated versus undervaccinated children.
Why did they stop follow-up at 4 years old?
I bet those CDC authors cut the time period short to just before things were starting to get interesting.
AI agrees with me.
Breaking news
This just came out.
And there is much more
For example,
And this article talks about a recently published study, again using record level data, not modelling, showing overall, children who received all six vaccines recommended for 2-month-olds were 68% more likely to die in their third month of life.
What this means
There is NO scientific justification for vaccine mandates for kids attending school. there is no reliable scientific data supporting such mandates.
Such mandates are unethical.
Every doctors recommending vaccine shots should tell parents “To be honest, it has no impact on mortality but it makes you feel like you are doing something to protect your kids and it helps to boost drug company profits.”
Vaccine mandates are based on misguided beliefs, not on facts or science.
I’m baffled why not a single member of Congress is pointing this out.
Just like fluoride, which is now being banned from water supplies. However, fluoride in the water supply was often mandated by municipalities that did not thoroughly check the science.
So a valid and double-meaning response to vaccine mandate proponents might be, "Have you been drinking too much fluoridated water?"
When it comes to vaccine mandates we should ALL be able to say “I just don’t wanna!” Just like Dr. Zervos said about why he didn’t want to submit his vaxx/unvaxxed study results.