"There are more deaths being reported to VAERS because people are aware of it now"
Dunn's argument that the increased number of reports is due to awareness of the VAERS reporting system doesn't hold water. This is the largest mass injection campaign in human history. The technology behind these injections has never been used before, makin…
"There are more deaths being reported to VAERS because people are aware of it now"
Dunn's argument that the increased number of reports is due to awareness of the VAERS reporting system doesn't hold water. This is the largest mass injection campaign in human history. The technology behind these injections has never been used before, making this the largest ever human experiment of all time. Might this have something to do with it?
As Kirsch brings up, there is no evidence for her assertions, just speculation.
Occam's razor is indeed the most obvious and therefore likely culprit it the cause of this rather than simply "over-reporting".
Dunn's argument that looking at the data and reducing the number of reports to a proportional number that reflects the historic reporting through VAERS is not a great use of time if (as the data likely proves) that we have a dangerous product being used which is causing mortality and injury at a level we seem to be seeing. What all physicians, doctors and medical practitioners should be doing is STOPPING THE EXPERIMENTAL SHOTS NOW. Surely? Isn't the hypocratic oath's opening "first, do no harm"?
Steve Kirsch being very civil and courteous regarding Dunn's unawareness of this substack.
"Just because there's an increase of reporting to the system, doesn't mean there's actual vaccine-induced serious side-effects"
I think I have listened enough to complete the poll now. Hats off to Steve for having this debate, for his patience and politeness. Also for Liza Dunn for participating in the debate too! It is a rare moment to see this debate aired in public.
"There are more deaths being reported to VAERS because people are aware of it now"
Dunn's argument that the increased number of reports is due to awareness of the VAERS reporting system doesn't hold water. This is the largest mass injection campaign in human history. The technology behind these injections has never been used before, making this the largest ever human experiment of all time. Might this have something to do with it?
As Kirsch brings up, there is no evidence for her assertions, just speculation.
Occam's razor is indeed the most obvious and therefore likely culprit it the cause of this rather than simply "over-reporting".
Dunn's argument that looking at the data and reducing the number of reports to a proportional number that reflects the historic reporting through VAERS is not a great use of time if (as the data likely proves) that we have a dangerous product being used which is causing mortality and injury at a level we seem to be seeing. What all physicians, doctors and medical practitioners should be doing is STOPPING THE EXPERIMENTAL SHOTS NOW. Surely? Isn't the hypocratic oath's opening "first, do no harm"?
Steve Kirsch being very civil and courteous regarding Dunn's unawareness of this substack.
"Just because there's an increase of reporting to the system, doesn't mean there's actual vaccine-induced serious side-effects"
I think I have listened enough to complete the poll now. Hats off to Steve for having this debate, for his patience and politeness. Also for Liza Dunn for participating in the debate too! It is a rare moment to see this debate aired in public.