pls compare: "we will reduce the number of people in the world that cannot afford our medicines by 50 per cent. ..." vs.: "We will reduce the number of people in the world by 50 per cent.' ” << HELLOOO, he's still talking about reducing a certain number of people, either those who cannot afford their drug prices (meaning poorer people -…
pls compare: "we will reduce the number of people in the world that cannot afford our medicines by 50 per cent. ..." vs.: "We will reduce the number of people in the world by 50 per cent.' ” << HELLOOO, he's still talking about reducing a certain number of people, either those who cannot afford their drug prices (meaning poorer people - will they, therefore, make them more affluent? or will they keep them poor and reduce their drug prices instead?), or all people. it is a very, very ominous choice of words.
pls compare: "we will reduce the number of people in the world that cannot afford our medicines by 50 per cent. ..." vs.: "We will reduce the number of people in the world by 50 per cent.' ” << HELLOOO, he's still talking about reducing a certain number of people, either those who cannot afford their drug prices (meaning poorer people - will they, therefore, make them more affluent? or will they keep them poor and reduce their drug prices instead?), or all people. it is a very, very ominous choice of words.