She is not nearly as smart or as informed as she thinks she is - that's what makes her dangerous, as she carries an "MD" title. However, her impotent attempts at red herrings all the way through the debate (so-called, not really, though - she got schooled) and her Fauci-like denials (I don't know / I haven't read that...) at the same time "outs" her as an equivocator and, worse, a pharma shill.
She is not nearly as smart or as informed as she thinks she is - that's what makes her dangerous, as she carries an "MD" title. However, her impotent attempts at red herrings all the way through the debate (so-called, not really, though - she got schooled) and her Fauci-like denials (I don't know / I haven't read that...) at the same time "outs" her as an equivocator and, worse, a pharma shill.
She is not nearly as smart or as informed as she thinks she is - that's what makes her dangerous, as she carries an "MD" title. However, her impotent attempts at red herrings all the way through the debate (so-called, not really, though - she got schooled) and her Fauci-like denials (I don't know / I haven't read that...) at the same time "outs" her as an equivocator and, worse, a pharma shill.