What happens when health authorities are forced to answer my questions?

We'll find out soon enough. I know only one person in the US who can compel an answer and is willing to ask the questions that need to be asked. Here's what I'm asking.

This image from “A Clockwork Orange” is pretty much what it will take to force public health officials to look at the data showing they are wrong. However, I found an easier way.

Message to the local health authority

Please see Figure 1 in this article. This figure uses the official US Nursing Home Data (published by CMS) and plots the Cases and deaths (time shifted to match the cases and scale adjusted to match the cases) which clearly shows that the COVID shots, which started rolling out to nursing homes in 2020, had no effect whatsoever on COVID mortality. It was unchanged.

There is no more definitive data source that I'm aware of for the impact of COVID vaccination on the most vulnerable in our society. Am I wrong? If so, what data source should I be using?

Furthermore, a paper just published in the peer-reviewed literature using nursing home data in the UK shows the impact on COVID vaccination for the elderly for shots beyond the first shot has now turned out to INCREASE COVID deaths and the results are highly statistically significant starting a few weeks after the shot, the very time that the death benefit is supposed to kick in. See this article which references the paper.

I'm sure you have data that is more definitive than these primary sources with credible analysis showing a statistically significant benefit that justifies your continuing to promote the COVID vaccines for the elderly.

I was wondering if you would share that data with me.

Thanks.

Attempt #2

The health authorities will refuse to download material from an unsafe site such as my Substack. So I re-wrote the request:

I am writing to you to ask you to clarify for me what the benefit of the COVID vaccine is.

We were told that it reduces infection, hospitalization, and death.

I have recently been made aware of high-quality data that contradicts those assertions.

If this data is wrong, can you inform me of why it is incorrect and also the best study that you are relying on that is more dispositive?

1. Regarding infection, the Cleveland clinic study showed more vaccinations was associated with more COVID infections and the differences were statistically significant (Figure 2). How is that possible if the vaccines do the opposite?

2. Regarding hospitalization, why would the COVID and flu vaccination breakdown of VA patients hospitalized for flu vs. COVID be so similar? Doesn’t that suggest to you that neither vaccine is effective? If not, how do you explain the lack of a difference? See https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202408.0338/v1

3. Regarding a mortality benefit, one of my supporters downloaded the US nursing home data from Medicare and plotted it. The case fatality rate didn’t change after the COVID vaccines rolled out to nursing homes. How is that possible? We were told by the CDC that the COVID vaccine reduces COVID death by a factor of 10X, and yet there was no change to the case fatality ratio (CFR) after the shots rolled out. Perhaps you can point me to a paper in the peer reviewed literature showing that the CFR dropped in US nursing homes after the COVID vaccine rollout that used the official data published by Medicare? Here’s the graph from the US Nursing home data (the deaths were scaled and shift to match the infections so that the CFR differences would be easy to see). If this is not correct, what graph should I be relying on that shows a reduction in the CFR after the vaccines rolled out in December 2020?
   

Thanks.

Summary

None of the officials in Santa Clara County will pose any of my questions to the local health authority and demand an answer beyond “No comment.”

But I found one person in the US who can and will ask the question, and has the power to compel a response. So there will be no more ducking of the questions that need to be asked.

We’ll know soon.