I suspect it is 1 in 30 severely injured. I also suspect 1 in 150 dead. Numbers say if you know well 60 people or 90 people 2 or 3 would be badly hurt. However, numbers never evenly distribute. Someone might know 7 or 10 while a few others not know any. Also where i live the real results didn’t show until the third shot. If your …
I suspect it is 1 in 30 severely injured. I also suspect 1 in 150 dead. Numbers say if you know well 60 people or 90 people 2 or 3 would be badly hurt. However, numbers never evenly distribute. Someone might know 7 or 10 while a few others not know any. Also where i live the real results didn’t show until the third shot. If your cohort got AZ first shot, with half getting saline, then Pfizer only after the second shot it might take awhile. I am not saying AZ is better but the negative effects are cumulative to each brand. Getting one AZ and then one Pfizer is arguably better than two of either. Possibly.
agree - injuries definitely not evenly spread and not everyone i know well got a third shot. i did read a while back from dr yeadon that in the US the majority of injuries had been linked to around 10 percent of the batches. my belief (or maybe just hope) is that there have been placebo saline shots, or that the vaccines were improperly stored, possibly causing a degradation of the contents, thus making them ineffective.
When I review data from my area there is an exponential uptick on the booster. One shot and unjabbed show little difference. Two shots and differences show. Three shots is where the ‘rubber hits the road’
My experience. Is the older the cohort the less noticeable the effect. Their eyes start to go. Their energy wanes, they get dozy. But they’re already old. I notice a slight sag to their faces. One side droops ever so slightly. Younger people seem to virulently respond. Negatively.
I suspect it is 1 in 30 severely injured. I also suspect 1 in 150 dead. Numbers say if you know well 60 people or 90 people 2 or 3 would be badly hurt. However, numbers never evenly distribute. Someone might know 7 or 10 while a few others not know any. Also where i live the real results didn’t show until the third shot. If your cohort got AZ first shot, with half getting saline, then Pfizer only after the second shot it might take awhile. I am not saying AZ is better but the negative effects are cumulative to each brand. Getting one AZ and then one Pfizer is arguably better than two of either. Possibly.
agree - injuries definitely not evenly spread and not everyone i know well got a third shot. i did read a while back from dr yeadon that in the US the majority of injuries had been linked to around 10 percent of the batches. my belief (or maybe just hope) is that there have been placebo saline shots, or that the vaccines were improperly stored, possibly causing a degradation of the contents, thus making them ineffective.
When I review data from my area there is an exponential uptick on the booster. One shot and unjabbed show little difference. Two shots and differences show. Three shots is where the ‘rubber hits the road’
I’ve two 70 year old aunts who have taken 4 jabs. I’ve literally held my breath, just waiting for something awful to happen but so far so good.
My experience. Is the older the cohort the less noticeable the effect. Their eyes start to go. Their energy wanes, they get dozy. But they’re already old. I notice a slight sag to their faces. One side droops ever so slightly. Younger people seem to virulently respond. Negatively.