The widely accepted gold standard is the randomized clinical trials, which showed a net mortality effect of "4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED" and a double-digit percentage increase in non-COVID (mostly cardiovascular-related) deaths with mRNA vaccination. The "it's not statistically significant" excuse that vaccine advocates or "scientific" purists use to dismiss these unfavorable results is somewhat ridiculous, because the COVID mortality benefit in the trials was even SMALLER than the excess non-COVID mortality risk, so the justification for taking the vaccine is entirely moot to begin with if they bring up "statistical significance". And anyone in the field knows that company-sponsored clinical trials such as these always yield an unrealistically OPTIMISTIC representation of a pharmaceutical product, because the companies design their trials in a best-case scenario for their product.
Clinical trial mortality results for Pfizer and Moderna combined:
COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo (-60%)
non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo (+16%)
overall: 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths (4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED)
In my opinion the work done by Dr. Naomi Wolf and her team of 3,250 professional analysis has to be a prominent source for truth as it reviewed Pfizer's own data and came to the conclusions that the vaccine did not provide protection, did not prevent transmission and was deadly. It also revealed that reproductive issues were uppermost in Pfizer's own analysis. The book: "The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity" is succinctly discussed in this interview with Del Bigtree at the 11 minute mark Dr. Wolf discloses that Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that the shot did not work. At the 13 minute mark she also reveals that Pfizer and the CDC etc. knew the shots caused heart problems by April 2021. Starting at the 19 minute mark she reveals that Pfizer documents seem to have a disproportionate interest in reproductive health and that 70 percent of the adverse events were with women. https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/dr-naomi-wolf-reveals-shocking-details-in-the-pfizer-papers-2/ You now know why they wanted to hide this information for 75 years
Those in power own the data everywhere and can change it. There ain't no gold standard official data or evidence, record-level or otherwise. Even with clean data, you just don't know and you can't trust it. One might be able to trust data that goes against the interests of those who own it.
But lots and lots of independent anecdotes all saying the same thing turn anecdotes into gold standard data. (They have to be independent anecdotes.)
This is why no one should doubt the many thousands of UFO abductee reports as being mere anecdotes. Both abductee and vaxx harm reports are independently generated and recorded and agree on their detailed particulars far beyond expectations.
Do not forget Dr. Naomi Wolf's book and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg's book. Dr. Wodarg is a whistle blower who was the former top scientific advisor to the EU. He has been ignored by all echoe chambers during all of this.
It blankets the entire population with lifelong side effects that become the baseline against which all future claims and studies of vaccine adverse events are compared.
Oh, and after remdesavir was banned everywhere else, they "donated" the remaining batches, that no one else would touch, to Australia, where they were pushing it on everyone. I screamed at my mother not to take it, but I hate to think how many died from it here.
Let's just call this what it is.. genocide on a global scale.
New Zealand also. My best friend got Run, Death is Near! infused, without her knowledge or consent while isolated in a locked ward in mid 2023! The hospitalisation was for bacterial pneumonia, but she developed a positive test for covid while in hospital. So, she was transferred to the locked covid ward (no visitation) and put on a protocol no longer endorsed by the WHO or CDC. Her doctors seemed disappointed that she recovered anyway.
I know what I know. And that is, my 36 year old friend died from an aggressive cancer one month after taking the vaccine. My father in law, within 12 hours. The street my mother in law lives in, 5 of the elderly were dead within a year. The neighbour opposite her house, her daughter has an aggressive cancer that started in her breast and is now in her brain. She is 41. My auntie had both of her breasts removed 4 months after being jabbed, where she had previously had clear mammograms every 2 years. My partners 3 aunties were dead within 6 months, and his uncle got an aggressive cancer and was dead within a year. Out and about, I talk to everyone, and the amount of 30-40 year old people with cancer is terrifying. Yesterday, the girl taking my blood was 27, and complained that since the pandemic, she has been losing her vision, where is was 20/20 before. I asked her if she had been vaccinated... "Of course, I had to for my job". My mother has Gillian barr (spelling sorry), and about 20 other side effects, my step father had 2 heart attacks and a stroke, then surgery to remove clots from his heart, and he now has The liver of an alcoholic and rapidly on setting dementia.. my 19 year old daughter hasn't had a period since my ex husband forced her to take it. The data will never reflect the true horror. It was manufactured to kill in a way that wasn't going to draw attention to itself. And it's doing a fantastic job of it.
Same thing in our circle. My father died my best friends father died my second best friend died of turbo cancer six months after the jab. Both are in denial and will not communicate. Our wider family is ominously silent. We suspect hidden injury, damaged health and shortened life span. None of us here touched the junk mostly thanks to Doctors Wakefield and Zelenko ( among others) and the work of The Highwire team, also Steve - bless him.
I am hard pressed to believe any data bases today. For example; with our Government offering financial bonuses for every COVID diagnosis the historically reliable influenza diagnoses inexplicably disappeared. A COVID diagnosis is worth $ 13,000. COVID and influenza share nearly identical symptoms. If you were a hospital manager and had 100 flu patients, how would you have those cases coded ?
The diagnostic criteria for "cases", "infections", "laboratory-confirmed Covid" were corrupt from the beginning. I probably treated a case in Nov., 2019, without definitive diagnosis or Remdesivir, and despite underlying interstitial pulmonary disease she survived.
Answer #3 suffers a bit from the same diagnostic dilemma- was the immunology good enough to separate those who had had mild (subclinical) exposure from the never-exposed?
In a medical world, a systematic review that assesses each source for bias using the Cochrane methodology, followed by a meta-analysis. It is ok to exclude RCTs, as well as.other studies, if they have clear evidence of bias, but in general the 'hierarchy of evidence' should be given due consideration.
The widely accepted gold standard is the randomized clinical trials, which showed a net mortality effect of "4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED" and a double-digit percentage increase in non-COVID (mostly cardiovascular-related) deaths with mRNA vaccination. The "it's not statistically significant" excuse that vaccine advocates or "scientific" purists use to dismiss these unfavorable results is somewhat ridiculous, because the COVID mortality benefit in the trials was even SMALLER than the excess non-COVID mortality risk, so the justification for taking the vaccine is entirely moot to begin with if they bring up "statistical significance". And anyone in the field knows that company-sponsored clinical trials such as these always yield an unrealistically OPTIMISTIC representation of a pharmaceutical product, because the companies design their trials in a best-case scenario for their product.
Clinical trial mortality results for Pfizer and Moderna combined:
COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo (-60%)
non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo (+16%)
overall: 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths (4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED)
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2589-0042%2823%2900810-6
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/
This is what they don't want you to know....
https://rumble.com/v5knm2x-337024905.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
In my opinion the work done by Dr. Naomi Wolf and her team of 3,250 professional analysis has to be a prominent source for truth as it reviewed Pfizer's own data and came to the conclusions that the vaccine did not provide protection, did not prevent transmission and was deadly. It also revealed that reproductive issues were uppermost in Pfizer's own analysis. The book: "The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity" is succinctly discussed in this interview with Del Bigtree at the 11 minute mark Dr. Wolf discloses that Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that the shot did not work. At the 13 minute mark she also reveals that Pfizer and the CDC etc. knew the shots caused heart problems by April 2021. Starting at the 19 minute mark she reveals that Pfizer documents seem to have a disproportionate interest in reproductive health and that 70 percent of the adverse events were with women. https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/dr-naomi-wolf-reveals-shocking-details-in-the-pfizer-papers-2/ You now know why they wanted to hide this information for 75 years
Agreed. Like not working.
Anecdotes are the gold standard.
Those in power own the data everywhere and can change it. There ain't no gold standard official data or evidence, record-level or otherwise. Even with clean data, you just don't know and you can't trust it. One might be able to trust data that goes against the interests of those who own it.
But lots and lots of independent anecdotes all saying the same thing turn anecdotes into gold standard data. (They have to be independent anecdotes.)
This is why no one should doubt the many thousands of UFO abductee reports as being mere anecdotes. Both abductee and vaxx harm reports are independently generated and recorded and agree on their detailed particulars far beyond expectations.
I happen to agree with you.
Do not forget Dr. Naomi Wolf's book and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg's book. Dr. Wodarg is a whistle blower who was the former top scientific advisor to the EU. He has been ignored by all echoe chambers during all of this.
Got the answer to why Hep B is injected at birth.
It blankets the entire population with lifelong side effects that become the baseline against which all future claims and studies of vaccine adverse events are compared.
Agreed. Once anybody is injected with any vaccine the baseline is gone.
Oh, and after remdesavir was banned everywhere else, they "donated" the remaining batches, that no one else would touch, to Australia, where they were pushing it on everyone. I screamed at my mother not to take it, but I hate to think how many died from it here.
Let's just call this what it is.. genocide on a global scale.
New Zealand also. My best friend got Run, Death is Near! infused, without her knowledge or consent while isolated in a locked ward in mid 2023! The hospitalisation was for bacterial pneumonia, but she developed a positive test for covid while in hospital. So, she was transferred to the locked covid ward (no visitation) and put on a protocol no longer endorsed by the WHO or CDC. Her doctors seemed disappointed that she recovered anyway.
I know what I know. And that is, my 36 year old friend died from an aggressive cancer one month after taking the vaccine. My father in law, within 12 hours. The street my mother in law lives in, 5 of the elderly were dead within a year. The neighbour opposite her house, her daughter has an aggressive cancer that started in her breast and is now in her brain. She is 41. My auntie had both of her breasts removed 4 months after being jabbed, where she had previously had clear mammograms every 2 years. My partners 3 aunties were dead within 6 months, and his uncle got an aggressive cancer and was dead within a year. Out and about, I talk to everyone, and the amount of 30-40 year old people with cancer is terrifying. Yesterday, the girl taking my blood was 27, and complained that since the pandemic, she has been losing her vision, where is was 20/20 before. I asked her if she had been vaccinated... "Of course, I had to for my job". My mother has Gillian barr (spelling sorry), and about 20 other side effects, my step father had 2 heart attacks and a stroke, then surgery to remove clots from his heart, and he now has The liver of an alcoholic and rapidly on setting dementia.. my 19 year old daughter hasn't had a period since my ex husband forced her to take it. The data will never reflect the true horror. It was manufactured to kill in a way that wasn't going to draw attention to itself. And it's doing a fantastic job of it.
Same thing in our circle. My father died my best friends father died my second best friend died of turbo cancer six months after the jab. Both are in denial and will not communicate. Our wider family is ominously silent. We suspect hidden injury, damaged health and shortened life span. None of us here touched the junk mostly thanks to Doctors Wakefield and Zelenko ( among others) and the work of The Highwire team, also Steve - bless him.
Take a look here:
https://kremer.tentary.com/p/GNV9M3
Expert opinion on benefits and risks of Comirnaty® the modRNA COVID-19 vaccine from Pfizer-Biontech
In about 1 month a similar document on Spikevax will appear.
I am hard pressed to believe any data bases today. For example; with our Government offering financial bonuses for every COVID diagnosis the historically reliable influenza diagnoses inexplicably disappeared. A COVID diagnosis is worth $ 13,000. COVID and influenza share nearly identical symptoms. If you were a hospital manager and had 100 flu patients, how would you have those cases coded ?
Exactly, there is official data that proves flu was misdiagnosed to get Coup-Fed 19 subsidies.
Evidence sources are going to get scrubbed... https://brownstone.org/articles/they-are-scrubbing-the-internet-right-now/
There is no efficacy because virology isn’t scientific.
Agreed - but, further than that, is science science?
A solid "No" to answer #1.
The diagnostic criteria for "cases", "infections", "laboratory-confirmed Covid" were corrupt from the beginning. I probably treated a case in Nov., 2019, without definitive diagnosis or Remdesivir, and despite underlying interstitial pulmonary disease she survived.
Answer #3 suffers a bit from the same diagnostic dilemma- was the immunology good enough to separate those who had had mild (subclinical) exposure from the never-exposed?
Best Gold Standard?
My ears. My eyes. My nose when I smell a rat...
The rest is just noise...
Good point. My old mate's mum didn't want to touch the junk but was bullied into it by him - now she is sick and her husband is dead.
In a medical world, a systematic review that assesses each source for bias using the Cochrane methodology, followed by a meta-analysis. It is ok to exclude RCTs, as well as.other studies, if they have clear evidence of bias, but in general the 'hierarchy of evidence' should be given due consideration.
Even with VAERS under reported by a factor of 10 or more, it still shows many dead and disabled people.
One might think you are preparing for a debate...or something ;)
well the money is now in, isn't it? ;)