The widely accepted gold standard is the randomized clinical trials, which showed a net mortality effect of "4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED" and a double-digit percentage increase in non-COVID (mostly cardiovascular-related) deaths with mRNA vaccination. The "it's not statistically significant" excuse that vaccine advocates or "scientific" purists use to dismiss these unfavorable results is somewhat ridiculous, because the COVID mortality benefit in the trials was even SMALLER than the excess non-COVID mortality risk, so the justification for taking the vaccine is entirely moot to begin with if they bring up "statistical significance". And anyone in the field knows that company-sponsored clinical trials such as these always yield an unrealistically OPTIMISTIC representation of a pharmaceutical product, because the companies design their trials in a best-case scenario for their product.
Clinical trial mortality results for Pfizer and Moderna combined:
COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo (-60%)
non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo (+16%)
overall: 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths (4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED)
In my opinion the work done by Dr. Naomi Wolf and her team of 3,250 professional analysis has to be a prominent source for truth as it reviewed Pfizer's own data and came to the conclusions that the vaccine did not provide protection, did not prevent transmission and was deadly. It also revealed that reproductive issues were uppermost in Pfizer's own analysis. The book: "The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity" is succinctly discussed in this interview with Del Bigtree at the 11 minute mark Dr. Wolf discloses that Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that the shot did not work. At the 13 minute mark she also reveals that Pfizer and the CDC etc. knew the shots caused heart problems by April 2021. Starting at the 19 minute mark she reveals that Pfizer documents seem to have a disproportionate interest in reproductive health and that 70 percent of the adverse events were with women. https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/dr-naomi-wolf-reveals-shocking-details-in-the-pfizer-papers-2/ You now know why they wanted to hide this information for 75 years
Those in power own the data everywhere and can change it. There ain't no gold standard official data or evidence, record-level or otherwise. Even with clean data, you just don't know and you can't trust it. One might be able to trust data that goes against the interests of those who own it.
But lots and lots of independent anecdotes all saying the same thing turn anecdotes into gold standard data. (They have to be independent anecdotes.)
This is why no one should doubt the many thousands of UFO abductee reports as being mere anecdotes. Both abductee and vaxx harm reports are independently generated and recorded and agree on their detailed particulars far beyond expectations.
Calling testimonial evidence (which is admissible in court, by the way) a "mere anecdote" is exactly like calling something a conspiracy theory - it's a false equivalence logical error that fits confirmation biases.
Hi Steve I just got re-acquainted with this May/24 substack by Sonia Elijah. She interviews Wouter Aukema from the Netherlands. He has downloaded all the EMA databases for all drugs and their adverse events. He has then created a dashboard that lets you analyze every drug for all the side effects reported. The Covid shots are off the wall. I think his data could be very useful to you. I hope you are already acquainted with him but thought I should send the link along. All the best.
Let's not forget Sucharet Bhakdi, a prestigious German professor of microbiology. His bio is too long to include here. He's one of the first experts I listened to about the potential dangers of the covid so called "vaccines." He talked about the vaccine's attack on the immune system. His wikipedia page says, "Bhakdi became a prominent source of misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that the pandemic was "fake" and that COVID-19 vaccines were going to decimate the world's population.[4][3]"
I couldn't read all the way through the page but, thankfully, he was reinstated and hundreds of people were there to congratulate him, cheering him on. Like Steve Kirsch, he is another prominent source of "misinformation." At this point, this is all they have ... smear campaigns to discredit truth tellers, those passionate investigators who work so hard and carefully to find the truth! I thank them for their intelligence, tenacity, and empathy for humanity. All I can do is steer people to their work. But, alas, most people just look at me with blank stares. They can't fathom the idea that their government is in cahoots with Big Pharma criminals. Since 2020: The sudden death of my son's best friend (heart attack); my niece who has brain cancer, my best friend's two sons one with brain cancer and the other son died last night of pancreatic cancer. Today I learned that another friend has brain cancer. I know three people who died of stroke. My own son passed out on our hard tile floor and ended up with a serious concussion. My next door neighbor's daughter passed out face down on her bathroom floor and my nephew passed out twice while driving, no one injured but himself and thank God his injuries have healed. Never in my life have I seen anything on this scale. Is this the new normal?
#10 - Biden, Harris, Pfizer, and Moderna smacked with MASSIVE lawsuit for anti-human crimes.
The lawsuit, which has been filed in the Southern District of Texas, demands an end to:
• The COVID-19 injections.
• The “poisoning of our skies” that people refer to as chemtrails.
• And other toxic practices deemed harmful to human beings.
Shelby Hosana, one of the multiple plaintiffs in the lawsuit, calls this “a whole lot of evil put into one hefty lawsuit.”
She explained that “every single thing in the lawsuit was based on a constitutional statute,” emphasizing their focus on constitutional violations that will be tough for the court to dismiss.
Going further, Hosana added, “If enough people... join this lawsuit as a plaintiff, we can actually turn it into class action status, meaning the lawsuit could represent a larger group of individuals, creating a collective force that the court cannot easily ignore.
“So we can overwhelm the Texas district court, and they'll have no choice but to turn it into a class action.”
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff.
I would submit that the gold standard for your first question is the 450,000 page data dump by Pfizer as analyzed by the "War Room/Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project". Unequivocally, the answer to vaccine effectiveness as determined by the manufacturer is "not much".
Mark Crispin Miller keeps close track of those who have died suddenly in the U.S. It is pretty shocking. I think Steve should have him on as a guest....https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/archive
In the preprint by Ed Dowd's team about cancer deaths in ages 15 to 44 in the United States, the reason why they got higher CMR in 2022 than 2021 was because they retrieved the data from CDC WONDER last year when it still used 2022 resident population estimates for 2021: sars2.net/statistic.html#Ed_Dowd_Cancer_deaths_in_ages_15_44_at_CDC_WONDER. But if you use the 2022 resident population estimates for 2022 instead then 2022 gets lower CMR than 2021. And also the decrease in cancer CMR between 1999 and 2000 was over 20 times bigger than the increase in cancer CMR between 2020 and 2021, so the increase between 2020 and 2021 looks very small compared to the long-term context. Also the long-term trend in cancer CMR before COVID appears to have been curved, so the 2010 to 2019 linear baseline used by Dowd's group may have been too steep, and I got even lower excess mortality in 2021 to 2023 when I used a quadratic baseline fitted against the CMR in 1999 to 2019.
In the preprint about cancer deaths in ages 75 to 84 in the United States, the reason why they got much higher CMR in 2022 than 2021 was again because they used resident population estimates for the year 2021 to calculate the CMR in 2022: sars2.net/statistic.html#Ed_Dowd_Cancer_deaths_in_ages_75_84_at_CDC_WONDER. But the massive wave of baby boomers started turning 75 around mid-2021 so the population size of ages 75 to 84 increased dramatically between 2021 and 2022. CDC WONDER also uses vintage 2020 population estimates for 2020, vintage 2021 estimates for 2021, and so on, even though the newer vintage estimates are more accurate and the US Census Bureau recommends using the newest vintage estimates. But when I switched to the vintage 2023 estimates for 2020 to 2023, ages 75 to 84 got higher cancer CMR in 2020 than 2021.
In the preprint about cancer deaths in ages 15 to 44 in England and Wales, unadjusted cancer mortality was close to the baseline in 2021 and 2022. Dowd's group applied an adjustment to the data where they increased cancer deaths in 2022 by about 32% to account for deaths that were missing due to a registration delay, because they estimated that the same proportion of deaths would be missing for cancer deaths and deaths from external causes. But actually deaths from external causes have a much longer registration delay on average than cancer deaths, so Dowd's adjustment increased cancer deaths by far too much and deaths from external causes too little: x.com/UncleJo46902375/status/1783797036749402598 (this thread erroneously said that the 2023 deaths were increased by about 32% even though it was actually 2022 deaths).
I think we need to carefull with the Czech data till it regards such old people vaccinated who can not even exist. I think in the hystory we never had a Czech male with 111 years and other old entries are suspicious as well.
Pohlavikod Rok_narozeni DatumUmrti Datum_1
M 1912 2021.09.24
F 1911 2021.07.27
F 1910 2021.03.28
M 1912 2023.11.29
Otherwise the Czech data absolutely favors for the vaccinated. I just cannot really beleive that it is not manipulated.
Q4 Where's the proof CONvid actually exists.....EVERY bit of data relies on completely meaningless bullshit tests.....As a simple rule EVERY snakeoil ever dished out on humanity has saved ZERO lives!!
There's two ways in which the Czech record-level data shows that the vaccines might be effective in preventing death.
The first is that during the COVID wave in November to December 2021, unvaccinated people had a much bigger spike in all-cause ASMR than vaccinated people: sars2.net/czech2.html#ASMR_by_month_and_vaccine_type. The difference remained in place even after I adjusted for the inherent/time-invariant healthy vaccinee effect so that I divided the ASMR of each group with their total ASMR in the second half of 2022 when there was a low number of COVID deaths.
The second is that in the winter of 2020 to 2021 when there were three distinct humps in all-cause deaths, the first hump was the highest and the third hump was the lowest in ages 80+ but in ages 40 to 59 the first hump was the lowest and the third hump was the highest: x.com/henjin256/status/1838961040635162901. It might be because ages 80+ got vaccinated earliest so more than 50% of people in ages 80+ had already been vaccinated by the time of the third hump. But in ages 40-59 less than 10% of people had been vaccinated by the time of the third hump.
Do not forget Dr. Naomi Wolf's book and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg's book. Dr. Wodarg is a whistle blower who was the former top scientific advisor to the EU. He has been ignored by all echoe chambers during all of this.
The widely accepted gold standard is the randomized clinical trials, which showed a net mortality effect of "4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED" and a double-digit percentage increase in non-COVID (mostly cardiovascular-related) deaths with mRNA vaccination. The "it's not statistically significant" excuse that vaccine advocates or "scientific" purists use to dismiss these unfavorable results is somewhat ridiculous, because the COVID mortality benefit in the trials was even SMALLER than the excess non-COVID mortality risk, so the justification for taking the vaccine is entirely moot to begin with if they bring up "statistical significance". And anyone in the field knows that company-sponsored clinical trials such as these always yield an unrealistically OPTIMISTIC representation of a pharmaceutical product, because the companies design their trials in a best-case scenario for their product.
Clinical trial mortality results for Pfizer and Moderna combined:
COVID deaths: 2 vaccine vs. 5 placebo (-60%)
non-COVID deaths: 29 vaccine vs. 25 placebo (+16%)
overall: 4 excess non-COVID deaths for every 3 less COVID deaths (4 KILLED FOR EVERY 3 SAVED)
https://www.cell.com/action/showFullTableHTML?isHtml=true&tableId=tbl1&pii=S2589-0042%2823%2900810-6
https://dailysceptic.org/2022/04/09/covid-vaccines-increase-risk-of-heart-related-deaths-by-up-to-50-lancet-analysis-of-trial-data-finds/
This is what they don't want you to know....
https://rumble.com/v5knm2x-337024905.html?e9s=src_v1_upp
In my opinion the work done by Dr. Naomi Wolf and her team of 3,250 professional analysis has to be a prominent source for truth as it reviewed Pfizer's own data and came to the conclusions that the vaccine did not provide protection, did not prevent transmission and was deadly. It also revealed that reproductive issues were uppermost in Pfizer's own analysis. The book: "The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer's Crimes Against Humanity" is succinctly discussed in this interview with Del Bigtree at the 11 minute mark Dr. Wolf discloses that Pfizer knew within three months of rollout that the shot did not work. At the 13 minute mark she also reveals that Pfizer and the CDC etc. knew the shots caused heart problems by April 2021. Starting at the 19 minute mark she reveals that Pfizer documents seem to have a disproportionate interest in reproductive health and that 70 percent of the adverse events were with women. https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/dr-naomi-wolf-reveals-shocking-details-in-the-pfizer-papers-2/ You now know why they wanted to hide this information for 75 years
Agreed. Like not working.
Anecdotes are the gold standard.
Those in power own the data everywhere and can change it. There ain't no gold standard official data or evidence, record-level or otherwise. Even with clean data, you just don't know and you can't trust it. One might be able to trust data that goes against the interests of those who own it.
But lots and lots of independent anecdotes all saying the same thing turn anecdotes into gold standard data. (They have to be independent anecdotes.)
This is why no one should doubt the many thousands of UFO abductee reports as being mere anecdotes. Both abductee and vaxx harm reports are independently generated and recorded and agree on their detailed particulars far beyond expectations.
Calling testimonial evidence (which is admissible in court, by the way) a "mere anecdote" is exactly like calling something a conspiracy theory - it's a false equivalence logical error that fits confirmation biases.
I happen to agree with you.
Hi Steve I just got re-acquainted with this May/24 substack by Sonia Elijah. She interviews Wouter Aukema from the Netherlands. He has downloaded all the EMA databases for all drugs and their adverse events. He has then created a dashboard that lets you analyze every drug for all the side effects reported. The Covid shots are off the wall. I think his data could be very useful to you. I hope you are already acquainted with him but thought I should send the link along. All the best.
https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/true-horrors-of-covid-vaccine-harm?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=email
Let's not forget Sucharet Bhakdi, a prestigious German professor of microbiology. His bio is too long to include here. He's one of the first experts I listened to about the potential dangers of the covid so called "vaccines." He talked about the vaccine's attack on the immune system. His wikipedia page says, "Bhakdi became a prominent source of misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic, claiming that the pandemic was "fake" and that COVID-19 vaccines were going to decimate the world's population.[4][3]"
I couldn't read all the way through the page but, thankfully, he was reinstated and hundreds of people were there to congratulate him, cheering him on. Like Steve Kirsch, he is another prominent source of "misinformation." At this point, this is all they have ... smear campaigns to discredit truth tellers, those passionate investigators who work so hard and carefully to find the truth! I thank them for their intelligence, tenacity, and empathy for humanity. All I can do is steer people to their work. But, alas, most people just look at me with blank stares. They can't fathom the idea that their government is in cahoots with Big Pharma criminals. Since 2020: The sudden death of my son's best friend (heart attack); my niece who has brain cancer, my best friend's two sons one with brain cancer and the other son died last night of pancreatic cancer. Today I learned that another friend has brain cancer. I know three people who died of stroke. My own son passed out on our hard tile floor and ended up with a serious concussion. My next door neighbor's daughter passed out face down on her bathroom floor and my nephew passed out twice while driving, no one injured but himself and thank God his injuries have healed. Never in my life have I seen anything on this scale. Is this the new normal?
Me K , IMO never rely on any of those sources if in any way their results were even partly based on a clinical trial run by the fox in the henhouse.
Not even in a small way .
Move on to another option .
The gold standard for me is conclusive proof that the Covid vaccine is worth taking. I am pretty sure that proof does not exist.
#10 - Biden, Harris, Pfizer, and Moderna smacked with MASSIVE lawsuit for anti-human crimes.
The lawsuit, which has been filed in the Southern District of Texas, demands an end to:
• The COVID-19 injections.
• The “poisoning of our skies” that people refer to as chemtrails.
• And other toxic practices deemed harmful to human beings.
Shelby Hosana, one of the multiple plaintiffs in the lawsuit, calls this “a whole lot of evil put into one hefty lawsuit.”
She explained that “every single thing in the lawsuit was based on a constitutional statute,” emphasizing their focus on constitutional violations that will be tough for the court to dismiss.
Going further, Hosana added, “If enough people... join this lawsuit as a plaintiff, we can actually turn it into class action status, meaning the lawsuit could represent a larger group of individuals, creating a collective force that the court cannot easily ignore.
“So we can overwhelm the Texas district court, and they'll have no choice but to turn it into a class action.”
If you know someone injured by the jabs, direct them to humanitysuit.com to become a plaintiff.
I would submit that the gold standard for your first question is the 450,000 page data dump by Pfizer as analyzed by the "War Room/Daily Clout Pfizer Documents Analysis Project". Unequivocally, the answer to vaccine effectiveness as determined by the manufacturer is "not much".
Dick Minnis
removingthecataract.substack.com
What are the best, "gold standard" analyses of gold standard data sets? To have these helps in sharing with others....
Mark Crispin Miller keeps close track of those who have died suddenly in the U.S. It is pretty shocking. I think Steve should have him on as a guest....https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/archive
there is no such thing as a safe vaccine; and they have no intentions of making it safe!!!!
I would team up with Ed Dowd and his data. Naomi's data is solid. Get the data from insurance companies and funeral homes.
In the preprint by Ed Dowd's team about cancer deaths in ages 15 to 44 in the United States, the reason why they got higher CMR in 2022 than 2021 was because they retrieved the data from CDC WONDER last year when it still used 2022 resident population estimates for 2021: sars2.net/statistic.html#Ed_Dowd_Cancer_deaths_in_ages_15_44_at_CDC_WONDER. But if you use the 2022 resident population estimates for 2022 instead then 2022 gets lower CMR than 2021. And also the decrease in cancer CMR between 1999 and 2000 was over 20 times bigger than the increase in cancer CMR between 2020 and 2021, so the increase between 2020 and 2021 looks very small compared to the long-term context. Also the long-term trend in cancer CMR before COVID appears to have been curved, so the 2010 to 2019 linear baseline used by Dowd's group may have been too steep, and I got even lower excess mortality in 2021 to 2023 when I used a quadratic baseline fitted against the CMR in 1999 to 2019.
In the preprint about cancer deaths in ages 75 to 84 in the United States, the reason why they got much higher CMR in 2022 than 2021 was again because they used resident population estimates for the year 2021 to calculate the CMR in 2022: sars2.net/statistic.html#Ed_Dowd_Cancer_deaths_in_ages_75_84_at_CDC_WONDER. But the massive wave of baby boomers started turning 75 around mid-2021 so the population size of ages 75 to 84 increased dramatically between 2021 and 2022. CDC WONDER also uses vintage 2020 population estimates for 2020, vintage 2021 estimates for 2021, and so on, even though the newer vintage estimates are more accurate and the US Census Bureau recommends using the newest vintage estimates. But when I switched to the vintage 2023 estimates for 2020 to 2023, ages 75 to 84 got higher cancer CMR in 2020 than 2021.
In the preprint about cancer deaths in ages 15 to 44 in England and Wales, unadjusted cancer mortality was close to the baseline in 2021 and 2022. Dowd's group applied an adjustment to the data where they increased cancer deaths in 2022 by about 32% to account for deaths that were missing due to a registration delay, because they estimated that the same proportion of deaths would be missing for cancer deaths and deaths from external causes. But actually deaths from external causes have a much longer registration delay on average than cancer deaths, so Dowd's adjustment increased cancer deaths by far too much and deaths from external causes too little: x.com/UncleJo46902375/status/1783797036749402598 (this thread erroneously said that the 2023 deaths were increased by about 32% even though it was actually 2022 deaths).
I think we need to carefull with the Czech data till it regards such old people vaccinated who can not even exist. I think in the hystory we never had a Czech male with 111 years and other old entries are suspicious as well.
Pohlavikod Rok_narozeni DatumUmrti Datum_1
M 1912 2021.09.24
F 1911 2021.07.27
F 1910 2021.03.28
M 1912 2023.11.29
Otherwise the Czech data absolutely favors for the vaccinated. I just cannot really beleive that it is not manipulated.
It is not visible here but the dates in my previous comment are the vaccination date of the individuals and they did not have death date enty.
Q4 Where's the proof CONvid actually exists.....EVERY bit of data relies on completely meaningless bullshit tests.....As a simple rule EVERY snakeoil ever dished out on humanity has saved ZERO lives!!
There's two ways in which the Czech record-level data shows that the vaccines might be effective in preventing death.
The first is that during the COVID wave in November to December 2021, unvaccinated people had a much bigger spike in all-cause ASMR than vaccinated people: sars2.net/czech2.html#ASMR_by_month_and_vaccine_type. The difference remained in place even after I adjusted for the inherent/time-invariant healthy vaccinee effect so that I divided the ASMR of each group with their total ASMR in the second half of 2022 when there was a low number of COVID deaths.
The second is that in the winter of 2020 to 2021 when there were three distinct humps in all-cause deaths, the first hump was the highest and the third hump was the lowest in ages 80+ but in ages 40 to 59 the first hump was the lowest and the third hump was the highest: x.com/henjin256/status/1838961040635162901. It might be because ages 80+ got vaccinated earliest so more than 50% of people in ages 80+ had already been vaccinated by the time of the third hump. But in ages 40-59 less than 10% of people had been vaccinated by the time of the third hump.
Do not forget Dr. Naomi Wolf's book and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg's book. Dr. Wodarg is a whistle blower who was the former top scientific advisor to the EU. He has been ignored by all echoe chambers during all of this.