Yes, a lawyer. I've drafted many complaints in cases alleging the causes of action Steve Kirsch discusses. No judge would take him seriously. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Yes, a lawyer. I've drafted many complaints in cases alleging the causes of action Steve Kirsch discusses. No judge would take him seriously. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Rose, a judge would not be deciding whether the paper should have been retracted, but instead, whether Springer Nature committed defamation, breach of implied contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, or tortious interference. There are not enough facts to support the elements of those causes of action, let alone for $250 million in damages. A judge would quickly throw this case out of court.
A "Leftist" Judge will throw it out. They are the only people left in the legal profession (sadly, created like widgets by the law school that you probably graduated from) that no longer believes in free speech. This is fascist tyranny and must be avoided at all costs. Maybe you should listen to this idiot:
"тАжA dictatorship means muzzles all round and consequently stultification. Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.тАЬ
It wouldn't mstter if he could prove every point he mentions. The country, judicial system is law-less,. I actually believe they would mock him by allowing it to be heard and then just rule in favor of the tyrants. Good is bad, bad is good, bitter is sweet, sweet is bitter, legal is illegal and illegal is noe legal. AKA the endtimes.
Yes, a lawyer. I've drafted many complaints in cases alleging the causes of action Steve Kirsch discusses. No judge would take him seriously. He doesn't know what he's talking about.
Rose, a judge would not be deciding whether the paper should have been retracted, but instead, whether Springer Nature committed defamation, breach of implied contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, or tortious interference. There are not enough facts to support the elements of those causes of action, let alone for $250 million in damages. A judge would quickly throw this case out of court.
A "Leftist" Judge will throw it out. They are the only people left in the legal profession (sadly, created like widgets by the law school that you probably graduated from) that no longer believes in free speech. This is fascist tyranny and must be avoided at all costs. Maybe you should listen to this idiot:
"тАжA dictatorship means muzzles all round and consequently stultification. Science can flourish only in an atmosphere of free speech.тАЬ
Albert Einstein
It wouldn't mstter if he could prove every point he mentions. The country, judicial system is law-less,. I actually believe they would mock him by allowing it to be heard and then just rule in favor of the tyrants. Good is bad, bad is good, bitter is sweet, sweet is bitter, legal is illegal and illegal is noe legal. AKA the endtimes.