Thank you to the 547 readers who filled out my survey. The results prove they lied to us about the COVID vaccine. It is a disaster. We now have an objective way to prove they lied to us.
Trolling and spamming the comments is the least effective way to contact Steve Kirsch. He does respond to comments sometimes but people can contact him at https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-to-contact-me. There's also Twitter which he is active on and Twitter Spaces that he joins.
You don't listen. 99.99% of VAERS reports resulted from UNAUTHORIZED USE and the providers that injected people have no immunity. They are liable for all harms.
Good gravy...the world doesn't revolve around a group of your 30 fellow friends...other people notice things TOO.
TELL PEOPLE. IT IS SELF EVIDENT. This is NOT complicated stuff, Steve:
I looked at your tweet and read through your comments. I don't think you're doing a very good job at making your case. If you have a legitimate perspective explain it in detail and people will listen. It's really that simple.
The insert instructions that came with the vaxxxes have been reported to be BLANK. Thus, informed consent COULD NOT BE OBTAINED. Big Pharma was responsible for that. They will say EVERYONE should have known the vaxxx was experimental!
I agree that they could never obtain informed consent but not because the insert was blank per se. The poisonous jab WAS experimental so unless individuals were explicitly told that it was experimental, (instead of what they were told which is that it was approved, safe and effective), and therefore they were fully informed that essentially they were becoming part of the experiment, with unknown outcomes and unknown short & long-term side effects, and that the jab could not be determined to be either safe OR effective, then it was at best a lie by omission by the medical provider that did the jabbing and that's not informed consent.
I will come back to this, I have to take my kids to a movie....like NOW.
The FDA, Pfizer, and Moderna required Authorized Persons to do these things for Authorized Use of. their EUA vaccines. This Moderna's:
****
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE ADMINISTRATION UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION
In order to mitigate the risks of using this unapproved product under EUA and to optimize the potential benefit of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, the following items are required. Use of unapproved Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 under this EUA is limited to the following (all requirements must be met):
.....
4. The vaccination provider is responsible for mandatory reporting of the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):
• vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event,
• serious adverse events* (irrespective of attribution to vaccination),
• cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) in adults, and
• cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.
Complete and submit reports to VAERS online at https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html. For further assistance with reporting to VAERS, call 1-800-822-7967. The reports should include the words “Moderna COVID- 19 Vaccine EUA” in the description section of the report.
V
V
V
THIS PART: “Moderna COVID- 19 Vaccine EUA”
****
Pfizer requires:
"Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA"
***
On ALL VAERS reports so THEY know the SAE resulted from AUTHORIZED USE.
Less than .01% followed these instructions, in VAERS, and lost their immunity.
***
I'll finish up later...I have to run, now....be back.
PS -- I could NOT be trying harder to make it clear...please try hard to understand me, as well. Story of my life is not being able to get my voice heard.
Why don't you write your own Substack article, take your time and lay it all out? Then you can come back and just post the link with a few comments - but leave out the hate and derision. As I said the comments are here for people who read the Steve Kirsch Newsletter and want to talk about them - not for writing your own articles and trolling the commenters without reading the articles. If you keep on this way you might be banned and all your comments would disappear.
As I said the comments are here for people who read the Steve Kirsch Newsletter and want to talk about them - not for writing your own articles and trolling the commenters without reading the articles.
I think I understand what you're saying but although I have no doubt that by the letter of the law you are correct, the problem is that no one will care. I'm not being dismissive, just realistic. For example you could just as easily say that ALL of the providers that failed to file reports in VAERS also lost immunity, which might also be technically accurate, but everyone already knows that this is the case for the vast majority of providers and no one cares. Not filing at all seems more negligent than filing but committing what they'll chalk up to being an 'administrative' error. I hope that makes sense.
You sound insane. Steve is not "running out the clock". He is one of the loudest voices in the world trying to get the injury and death numbers out so people can be held accountable and they will stop promoting vaccines of all types without real safety data. You are comparing apples and oranges. Steve is working on this his way and doing a great job. You obviously have an opinion and know how to use a computer. Don't lay this all at Steve's feet.
Steve Kirsch and VSRF have helped thousands of vaccine injured directly and all of them indirectly. VSRF is partnered with many others who help vaccine injured - like The Wellness Company and many law firms.
You don't read the articles or watch the interviews or you would know this.
How many vaccine injured have you helped? Directly?
Are you just here to troll and hate? You obviously don't read the articles. The other commenters read the articles and are here to discuss them. They deserve some consideration.
Igor Chudov is a friend of Steve Kirsch - Mr. Kirsch helped him start his substack. Did you check with him before using his name to bash Kirsch?
Did you know Steve Kirsch interviewed Brook Jackson?
I totally agree! My heart goes out to the families that lost loved ones to the toxic bioweapon and they deserve justice but I bet they would much rather have their loved one back. What about the vaccine injured, where is the data and endless crusade for us?? We are struggling to survive day to day and begging for treatment without recognition. It's concerning that once again, vaccine injured are not high priority and falling through the cracks! We are suffering and no where to turn! Why is death more important than crusading for the vaccine injured?
Please...go to the link...see if your VAERS report has those specific required words included. If not, it was UNAUTHORIZED USE and they have no immunity.
I care...I am trying to reach people with this info. Steve won't share...I've asked so many times. Every time it's another poll....nothing that can help you.
Please share it, too, with anyone you know harmed by the jabs. I am sure SOME of them may be interested even if you aren't.
I mean...I would like to be able to go to the doctor and feel ok about it, too. So disregarding this...it's the same thing as giving them a free pass to keep going. But whatever. Do what you want. People usually put themselves above everyone, not a shock to me.
can you lay out for those of us who aren't too sharp exactly what you are saying? Because I've read your posts and don't exactly understand what point you are trying to make.
I don't see any reason to bash Steve Kirsch. Aren't we all on the same side?
From this and other comments I think what you are trying to get across is that there are legal issues concerning VAERS involving immunity from lawsuits or prosecution. Also you have said in other comments the statute of limitations is running out.
Your mission as you see it is to get Steve Kirsch to publicize these facts in a way that people can understand. I can think of a way that might help you in your mission.
Three lawyers that Steve Kirsch works with and are friends with are Jeff Childers, Aaron Siri and Warner Mendenhall. Contact one of these law firms and explain the legal situation. Ask them to relay to Steve Kirsch these facts and advise that he write an article about them. I would write it out in detail, email it, then call to follow up.
If Mr. Kirsch receives the information from a lawyer and it is verified by a lawyer he is much more likely to write the article you desire. Spamming and trolling the comment board isn't going to work. Why not try something with a chance of working?
Okay. I read this from WayneBGood and it makes sense. "there are legal issues concerning VAERS concerning immunity from lawsuits or prosecution. Also you have said in other comments the statute of limitations is running out."
I still don't see what the connection is between what you seem to be saying and what this thread is about.
I have read (no idea whether it's true or not) that the VAERS reporting process is so laborious and difficult that not many people will make the effort. So doctors won't do it, does that mean that the injured party is responsible? How would people even know that? And the statue of limitations? So justice for greed and democide is confounded by the law?
It sounds like you're hurting and I'm very sorry about that. It is truly horrible what "they" have done to us, all of us in one way or another. God bless you.
I look forward to the podcast with Risch. I read your mention of FOIA above, why it won't work in CA and a denial elsewhere due to "expense", which is no longer a valid reason as you have offered to pay.
I am still in support of an efficient, streamlined national-level FOIA request of all states and municipalities, where possible and relevant. When they deny, dismiss, ignore, or otherwise fail in their duties, perhaps it's time for a new documentary on FOIA failure, the context of the subject, those responsible, and the data that they hide from their citizenry for no good reason. There is a lot that could go into such a documentary. The discussion of the SIDS data you uncovered, for example, proves a dangerous incompetence with regards to coroners, medical examiners, and those government departments that are in charge of them. All such relevant data could be tied together within an impactful documentary.
My sister falls in the cohort of people who believed the authorities (and bowed to pressure from her husband), took the initial two Pfizer shots, and now has microclotting and other issues that she firmly attributes to the shots. The only thing I fault her for is not asking questions when historically she has been very skeptical and distrusting of authority.
I found the linked article, along with several others by this author, with the associated comments to be remarkable. Despite everything, we still occupy diametrically opposed universes. I find myself whether there will ever truly be a reckoning.
The following comment by an M.D. is telling:
"Ryan McCormick, M.D.
Writes Examined
Oct 6
·edited Oct 6
Agreed. Benefits outweigh risks. Long term effects of illness are much scarier than a few spike proteins floating around. I fear coronary artery invasion, central and autonomic nervous system invasion, and post Covid conditions. I’m “pro-human” and therefore I’m getting my XBB booster today, and so is my daughter. I expect it will reduce my chances of getting infected for a while, and every time I don’t contract Covid is a pair of dice left uncast. I expect it will help reduce long Covid and collateral damage like previous vaccinations when I do get infected."
The response by a true believer is even more remarkable:
"tkpwaeub
Writes tkpwaeub’s Substack
Oct 7
·edited Oct 7
I just tested positive 19 days after receiving the booster - just as a little reminder that these aren't sterilizing vaccines. But then again, most vaccines aren't. I trust the science that vaccination reduces the severity of the disease. Along with getting Paxlovid, this bout I'm having is looking a lot more like a live attenuated vaccine than an infection. That's sort of the whole point."
Same here, suspect since fed mandate was applicable at work. Turbo cancer of coworker at 47, also another spouse of coworker in 40s the same. Coworkers that boosted are sickly and have new ailments. Some have had clots or almost died from sepsis--older/lazier workforce that is easy to obfuscate. Thankfully, my extended family members that stuck with jab just get covid all the time or some other "sinus" infection or strep so far. BTW, I never thought these jabs would work, but was wrong to treat them as if they were a "harmless flu shot". I will likely never take any vaccination again and do my best to share what I have learned. I trusted those with credentials and that our country, although not perfect, would do its best ensure safety and protect life.
Yes. I didn't respond either because I didn't know details re: cousins and mother-in-law, but knew enough to be very sure it was the vaxxx. Methinks Steve's estimate of deaths and damage are understated as a % of the vaxxxed. Those who had no casualties could have easily reported fully! But he was only surveyed for those who knew of deaths.
On the other hand, unless I missed something, I don't see how he gets to an estimate of deaths by surveying people who experienced that ONLY. I'm not totally ignorant of statistics as I used to work with them as an engineer. I'm not a skeptic about vaxxx death and damage.
BUT! Even Big Pharma admits some people would die from the vaxxxx. Isn't Steve just proving that correct? Where is the proof of % of death and damage to the vaxxxed as compared to unvaxxxed? Big Pharma insisted on liability protection because they KNEW and ADMITTED some would die or be damaged.
I think he is saying the time sequence of shot, then shortly afterwards, death; shows the connection. If the vaccines were safe then the deaths would be spread out over the months afterwards.
Thank you very much for your thoughtfulness. Most other people around Jim including his wife still do not fully comprehend that the experimental genetically active injections caused Jim's death, though I keep putting information out. We need to wake up as many people as possible.
Pfizer, FDA & Fact Checkers LIED when they said Toxic Graphene Oxide was not inside the COVID-19 Vaccine according to Federal Court Ordered Published Documents
I wasn't able to follow this chart. Why are the bars supposed to be equal height? It didn't pop out at me. I had to decipher things. I want it to POP out at me. Too much was assumed that the reader was already in your mindset. Now this substack article was written by a professional with years of research experience. It's presented quite well. It made point after point, simply and directly. Very easy to follow.
I mean this as constructive criticism. You are just beginning as a journalist / investigator, and I do appriciate the effort you put in day in and day out. I just want you to present things better. Programmers want flow, with no interruptions, forced by having to decipher things.
If the jabs had no deadly effect, the bars would just reflect the normal death rate of about .8% of the population per year with no relationship to "time of jab." So, the charts do show a connection to the shot. Maybe Steve knows statistics a lot better than me, but he REALLY needs to discuss this MORE!
Insurance companies are under government regulation and their RESERVES are vulnerable to government control. They are afraid to buck the system. Regulators told them to "just raise your rates to cover whatever."
Second try, 3 days later: Ok, shoot, I admit, I'm stupid but I don't understand Steve's poll results and why these are proof. Could someone without making fun explain this to me in an easy way? Highly appreciated.
Your work is so vital but it breaks my heart to fully understand the tragedy that descended upon innocent people and the corrupt propaganda and authoritarianism that perpetuates the tragedy. I can hardly bring myself to read your posts anymore, but I force myself to do so regardless.
Risch podcast: added the link to article. it's a prerecord tonight.
A ban just makes mattemoon look right about you to me. FYI.
I took the ban off to give her a chance to respond and avoid being banned.
If they want to now. I’m glad you removed it .It sounds like they have tried to get him the info, before.
Trolling and spamming the comments is the least effective way to contact Steve Kirsch. He does respond to comments sometimes but people can contact him at https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-to-contact-me. There's also Twitter which he is active on and Twitter Spaces that he joins.
You don't listen. 99.99% of VAERS reports resulted from UNAUTHORIZED USE and the providers that injected people have no immunity. They are liable for all harms.
Good gravy...the world doesn't revolve around a group of your 30 fellow friends...other people notice things TOO.
TELL PEOPLE. IT IS SELF EVIDENT. This is NOT complicated stuff, Steve:
https://x.com/Mabel__Syrup__/status/1719371496865345835?s=20
The statute of limitations for personal injury claims is expiring for thousands every day.
I know you are running out the clock leading the vax-injured nowhere near justice. I see you!
You know that NO govt agency nor Phrama company will EVER accepted liability for 'Unauthorized Use.' A-hole.
I looked at your tweet and read through your comments. I don't think you're doing a very good job at making your case. If you have a legitimate perspective explain it in detail and people will listen. It's really that simple.
The insert instructions that came with the vaxxxes have been reported to be BLANK. Thus, informed consent COULD NOT BE OBTAINED. Big Pharma was responsible for that. They will say EVERYONE should have known the vaxxx was experimental!
I agree that they could never obtain informed consent but not because the insert was blank per se. The poisonous jab WAS experimental so unless individuals were explicitly told that it was experimental, (instead of what they were told which is that it was approved, safe and effective), and therefore they were fully informed that essentially they were becoming part of the experiment, with unknown outcomes and unknown short & long-term side effects, and that the jab could not be determined to be either safe OR effective, then it was at best a lie by omission by the medical provider that did the jabbing and that's not informed consent.
I will come back to this, I have to take my kids to a movie....like NOW.
The FDA, Pfizer, and Moderna required Authorized Persons to do these things for Authorized Use of. their EUA vaccines. This Moderna's:
****
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR MODERNA COVID-19 VACCINE ADMINISTRATION UNDER EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION
In order to mitigate the risks of using this unapproved product under EUA and to optimize the potential benefit of the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine, the following items are required. Use of unapproved Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for active immunization to prevent COVID-19 under this EUA is limited to the following (all requirements must be met):
.....
4. The vaccination provider is responsible for mandatory reporting of the following to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):
• vaccine administration errors whether or not associated with an adverse event,
• serious adverse events* (irrespective of attribution to vaccination),
• cases of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome (MIS) in adults, and
• cases of COVID-19 that result in hospitalization or death.
Complete and submit reports to VAERS online at https://vaers.hhs.gov/reportevent.html. For further assistance with reporting to VAERS, call 1-800-822-7967. The reports should include the words “Moderna COVID- 19 Vaccine EUA” in the description section of the report.
V
V
V
THIS PART: “Moderna COVID- 19 Vaccine EUA”
****
Pfizer requires:
"Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA"
***
On ALL VAERS reports so THEY know the SAE resulted from AUTHORIZED USE.
Less than .01% followed these instructions, in VAERS, and lost their immunity.
***
I'll finish up later...I have to run, now....be back.
PS -- I could NOT be trying harder to make it clear...please try hard to understand me, as well. Story of my life is not being able to get my voice heard.
that ban is sketchy AF. Bookmarked your link to share
Why don't you write your own Substack article, take your time and lay it all out? Then you can come back and just post the link with a few comments - but leave out the hate and derision. As I said the comments are here for people who read the Steve Kirsch Newsletter and want to talk about them - not for writing your own articles and trolling the commenters without reading the articles. If you keep on this way you might be banned and all your comments would disappear.
No, they’re right. Maybe you should care more about sharing that info than coddling Steve?
As I said the comments are here for people who read the Steve Kirsch Newsletter and want to talk about them - not for writing your own articles and trolling the commenters without reading the articles.
I think I understand what you're saying but although I have no doubt that by the letter of the law you are correct, the problem is that no one will care. I'm not being dismissive, just realistic. For example you could just as easily say that ALL of the providers that failed to file reports in VAERS also lost immunity, which might also be technically accurate, but everyone already knows that this is the case for the vast majority of providers and no one cares. Not filing at all seems more negligent than filing but committing what they'll chalk up to being an 'administrative' error. I hope that makes sense.
Yes it does, unfortunately, very well put
You sound insane. Steve is not "running out the clock". He is one of the loudest voices in the world trying to get the injury and death numbers out so people can be held accountable and they will stop promoting vaccines of all types without real safety data. You are comparing apples and oranges. Steve is working on this his way and doing a great job. You obviously have an opinion and know how to use a computer. Don't lay this all at Steve's feet.
I care about the vaccine injured getting justice. You care about Steve.
There's the difference and it is YOU that sounds insane.
Try fighting the perpetrators rather than what you perceive as the imperfect resistance.
Steve Kirsch and VSRF have helped thousands of vaccine injured directly and all of them indirectly. VSRF is partnered with many others who help vaccine injured - like The Wellness Company and many law firms.
You don't read the articles or watch the interviews or you would know this.
How many vaccine injured have you helped? Directly?
The statute of limitations for murder does not expire!
EXACTLY!
It's a personal injury/wrongful death claim. The people need compensation so they can pay for their medical bills.,
Are you just here to troll and hate? You obviously don't read the articles. The other commenters read the articles and are here to discuss them. They deserve some consideration.
Igor Chudov is a friend of Steve Kirsch - Mr. Kirsch helped him start his substack. Did you check with him before using his name to bash Kirsch?
Did you know Steve Kirsch interviewed Brook Jackson?
https://www.vacsafety.org/36-excerpt-when-does-america-wake-up-calling-all-whistleblowers/
I totally agree! My heart goes out to the families that lost loved ones to the toxic bioweapon and they deserve justice but I bet they would much rather have their loved one back. What about the vaccine injured, where is the data and endless crusade for us?? We are struggling to survive day to day and begging for treatment without recognition. It's concerning that once again, vaccine injured are not high priority and falling through the cracks! We are suffering and no where to turn! Why is death more important than crusading for the vaccine injured?
Please...go to the link...see if your VAERS report has those specific required words included. If not, it was UNAUTHORIZED USE and they have no immunity.
https://x.com/Mabel__Syrup__/status/1719371496865345835?s=20
I care...I am trying to reach people with this info. Steve won't share...I've asked so many times. Every time it's another poll....nothing that can help you.
Please share it, too, with anyone you know harmed by the jabs. I am sure SOME of them may be interested even if you aren't.
I mean...I would like to be able to go to the doctor and feel ok about it, too. So disregarding this...it's the same thing as giving them a free pass to keep going. But whatever. Do what you want. People usually put themselves above everyone, not a shock to me.
can you lay out for those of us who aren't too sharp exactly what you are saying? Because I've read your posts and don't exactly understand what point you are trying to make.
I don't see any reason to bash Steve Kirsch. Aren't we all on the same side?
From this and other comments I think what you are trying to get across is that there are legal issues concerning VAERS involving immunity from lawsuits or prosecution. Also you have said in other comments the statute of limitations is running out.
Your mission as you see it is to get Steve Kirsch to publicize these facts in a way that people can understand. I can think of a way that might help you in your mission.
Three lawyers that Steve Kirsch works with and are friends with are Jeff Childers, Aaron Siri and Warner Mendenhall. Contact one of these law firms and explain the legal situation. Ask them to relay to Steve Kirsch these facts and advise that he write an article about them. I would write it out in detail, email it, then call to follow up.
If Mr. Kirsch receives the information from a lawyer and it is verified by a lawyer he is much more likely to write the article you desire. Spamming and trolling the comment board isn't going to work. Why not try something with a chance of working?
Okay. I read this from WayneBGood and it makes sense. "there are legal issues concerning VAERS concerning immunity from lawsuits or prosecution. Also you have said in other comments the statute of limitations is running out."
I still don't see what the connection is between what you seem to be saying and what this thread is about.
I have read (no idea whether it's true or not) that the VAERS reporting process is so laborious and difficult that not many people will make the effort. So doctors won't do it, does that mean that the injured party is responsible? How would people even know that? And the statue of limitations? So justice for greed and democide is confounded by the law?
Thank you so much for the information.
Why is Steve an a-hole for exposing the real death toll from the COVID shots? I don't understand your comment.
Don't expect conformity to basic logic from shit sprayers
It sounds like you're hurting and I'm very sorry about that. It is truly horrible what "they" have done to us, all of us in one way or another. God bless you.
I look forward to the podcast with Risch. I read your mention of FOIA above, why it won't work in CA and a denial elsewhere due to "expense", which is no longer a valid reason as you have offered to pay.
I am still in support of an efficient, streamlined national-level FOIA request of all states and municipalities, where possible and relevant. When they deny, dismiss, ignore, or otherwise fail in their duties, perhaps it's time for a new documentary on FOIA failure, the context of the subject, those responsible, and the data that they hide from their citizenry for no good reason. There is a lot that could go into such a documentary. The discussion of the SIDS data you uncovered, for example, proves a dangerous incompetence with regards to coroners, medical examiners, and those government departments that are in charge of them. All such relevant data could be tied together within an impactful documentary.
My sister falls in the cohort of people who believed the authorities (and bowed to pressure from her husband), took the initial two Pfizer shots, and now has microclotting and other issues that she firmly attributes to the shots. The only thing I fault her for is not asking questions when historically she has been very skeptical and distrusting of authority.
Purely by accident, I stumbled upon this Substack: https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/a-response-to-florida-surgeon-generals
I found the linked article, along with several others by this author, with the associated comments to be remarkable. Despite everything, we still occupy diametrically opposed universes. I find myself whether there will ever truly be a reckoning.
The following comment by an M.D. is telling:
"Ryan McCormick, M.D.
Writes Examined
Oct 6
·edited Oct 6
Agreed. Benefits outweigh risks. Long term effects of illness are much scarier than a few spike proteins floating around. I fear coronary artery invasion, central and autonomic nervous system invasion, and post Covid conditions. I’m “pro-human” and therefore I’m getting my XBB booster today, and so is my daughter. I expect it will reduce my chances of getting infected for a while, and every time I don’t contract Covid is a pair of dice left uncast. I expect it will help reduce long Covid and collateral damage like previous vaccinations when I do get infected."
The response by a true believer is even more remarkable:
"tkpwaeub
Writes tkpwaeub’s Substack
Oct 7
·edited Oct 7
I just tested positive 19 days after receiving the booster - just as a little reminder that these aren't sterilizing vaccines. But then again, most vaccines aren't. I trust the science that vaccination reduces the severity of the disease. Along with getting Paxlovid, this bout I'm having is looking a lot more like a live attenuated vaccine than an infection. That's sort of the whole point."
Same here, suspect since fed mandate was applicable at work. Turbo cancer of coworker at 47, also another spouse of coworker in 40s the same. Coworkers that boosted are sickly and have new ailments. Some have had clots or almost died from sepsis--older/lazier workforce that is easy to obfuscate. Thankfully, my extended family members that stuck with jab just get covid all the time or some other "sinus" infection or strep so far. BTW, I never thought these jabs would work, but was wrong to treat them as if they were a "harmless flu shot". I will likely never take any vaccination again and do my best to share what I have learned. I trusted those with credentials and that our country, although not perfect, would do its best ensure safety and protect life.
Yes. I didn't respond either because I didn't know details re: cousins and mother-in-law, but knew enough to be very sure it was the vaxxx. Methinks Steve's estimate of deaths and damage are understated as a % of the vaxxxed. Those who had no casualties could have easily reported fully! But he was only surveyed for those who knew of deaths.
On the other hand, unless I missed something, I don't see how he gets to an estimate of deaths by surveying people who experienced that ONLY. I'm not totally ignorant of statistics as I used to work with them as an engineer. I'm not a skeptic about vaxxx death and damage.
BUT! Even Big Pharma admits some people would die from the vaxxxx. Isn't Steve just proving that correct? Where is the proof of % of death and damage to the vaxxxed as compared to unvaxxxed? Big Pharma insisted on liability protection because they KNEW and ADMITTED some would die or be damaged.
I think he is saying the time sequence of shot, then shortly afterwards, death; shows the connection. If the vaccines were safe then the deaths would be spread out over the months afterwards.
Yes, but possible connection is not in dispute! It is the frequency. Big Pharma admits Rare deaths and damage
The whole thing was to depopulate the planet
Thank you very much for your thoughtfulness. Most other people around Jim including his wife still do not fully comprehend that the experimental genetically active injections caused Jim's death, though I keep putting information out. We need to wake up as many people as possible.
Pfizer, FDA & Fact Checkers LIED when they said Toxic Graphene Oxide was not inside the COVID-19 Vaccine according to Federal Court Ordered Published Documents
BY THE EXPOSÉ ON NOVEMBER 3, 2023
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/03/pfizer-fda-fact-checkers-lied-when-they-said-toxic-graphene-oxide-wasnt-in-the-c19-jab/?cmid=055a9820-5316-4769-8cae-a3b7b0c05021
Jaw-Dropping Fact: CDC Data confirms COVID Vaccine can reduce your Lifespan by at least 24 years
BY THE EXPOSÉ ON OCTOBER 30, 2023
https://expose-news.com/2023/10/30/24-year-lifespan-reduction-c19-vaccination/?cmid=f62662fe-cf9f-4a3a-ba3f-d2453cc7cd60
Your Family & Friends Were Used as Lab Rats: COVID Vaccines Have Caused a Dangerously Deadly Alliance Between mRNA, Graphene & Nanotechnology
BY THE EXPOSÉ ON NOVEMBER 2, 2023
https://expose-news.com/2023/11/02/your-family-was-used-as-labrats-graphene-mrna-nanotech-c19-vaccines/?cmid=280ef236-f6f5-4f61-b5fb-23ac06b6303b
Are their any mortality statistics based upon sexual orientation?
I wasn't able to follow this chart. Why are the bars supposed to be equal height? It didn't pop out at me. I had to decipher things. I want it to POP out at me. Too much was assumed that the reader was already in your mindset. Now this substack article was written by a professional with years of research experience. It's presented quite well. It made point after point, simply and directly. Very easy to follow.
=====
https://soniaelijah.substack.com/p/piercing-the-veil-of-silence-over?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
=====
I mean this as constructive criticism. You are just beginning as a journalist / investigator, and I do appriciate the effort you put in day in and day out. I just want you to present things better. Programmers want flow, with no interruptions, forced by having to decipher things.
If the jabs had no deadly effect, the bars would just reflect the normal death rate of about .8% of the population per year with no relationship to "time of jab." So, the charts do show a connection to the shot. Maybe Steve knows statistics a lot better than me, but he REALLY needs to discuss this MORE!
I"m still confused by Steves presentation .. "time of jab"? Here's Steves chart
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb0a20e5e-667d-4bfc-8b51-65d7c76031f0_1141x474.png
===
Here's the chart from the link to Sonia Elijah's substack that I can see immediately.
(I hope these links work on here) It pops out at you .. Steve's chart I'm still trying to understand.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fe528548d-74ad-4355-9b3a-1a51c076eb81_1456x713.jpeg?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Don't know if you've seen this report from the insurance industry on excess deaths but it shows they're worried: https://insurancenewsnet.com/innarticle/excess-mortality-continuing-surge-causes-concerns Other insurance advisors are still stuck in the "it's all due to Covid" nonsense.
Insurance companies are under government regulation and their RESERVES are vulnerable to government control. They are afraid to buck the system. Regulators told them to "just raise your rates to cover whatever."
I'm looking for information specific to the J&J vaccine - would appreciate any leads - thank you
They're blaming it on climate change. AYFKM?
https://news.yahoo.com/heart-deaths-to-double-warning-over-health-effects-of-climate-change-121225325.html
Nothing is too absurd for these people to claim to hide their genocide.
Second try, 3 days later: Ok, shoot, I admit, I'm stupid but I don't understand Steve's poll results and why these are proof. Could someone without making fun explain this to me in an easy way? Highly appreciated.
Shows connection of increased deaths to time of jab. I don't see how it proves any % of deaths, ie. % of vaxxxed people who die.
Your work is so vital but it breaks my heart to fully understand the tragedy that descended upon innocent people and the corrupt propaganda and authoritarianism that perpetuates the tragedy. I can hardly bring myself to read your posts anymore, but I force myself to do so regardless.
a young man playing basketball suddenly collapse and died in the Philippines
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jBKpVWO9zg
This layperson needs some help. The left / bottom to top measurement is clear. The bottom / left to right measurement is not. What does it represent ?
You are amazing Steve. Thank you.