2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Why is no one considering this? The "vaccine" functions by inserting mRNA into a cell and programming it to produce the spike proteins on the cell's surface (funny how similar this is to how a virus functions, eh?). In other words, it creates foreign cell markers on the cell's surface. The immune system detects the foreign cell markers (aka spike protein) and creates antibodies against it. Now here is the clinch - in normal circumstances what do such created antibodies do to the cells that contain the foreign cell markers? (Answer: the antibodies attack the cells.) So, what is actually preventing the anti-spike protein antibodies from attacking the cells that those spike proteins were created upon?

Expand full comment

Many are considering this, but they're pretending that it is not true & that these are normal"vaccines" like we understood them to be in the past (before the definition was changed) & making false claims like getting the shots that only damage their victims will somehow protect others. Gene Simmons is telling us that those who refuse to be injected are "selfish" even though it can be argued that taking these mRNA poisons is selfish since they ONLY affect the person who takes them.

Expand full comment