You can check the supremecourt.gov website or childrenshealthdefense.com, as I did. No, this didn't happen. Also, the 2013 SC ruling that declared "people who took the mRNA vax are now transhuman and owned by a corporation" didn't happen either. That language is not in either of the 2 decisions most cited (Myriad annd Monsanto). In the Myriad case (BRCA1) the SC Court went so far as to say they were NOT ruling on whether generically modified DNA is patent-eligible, and that would require a new case. Don't believe everything you read, even from "trustworthy" sources.
Any truth to blog posts around Robert Kennedy's Supreme Court victory regards the covid vaccines?
You can check the supremecourt.gov website or childrenshealthdefense.com, as I did. No, this didn't happen. Also, the 2013 SC ruling that declared "people who took the mRNA vax are now transhuman and owned by a corporation" didn't happen either. That language is not in either of the 2 decisions most cited (Myriad annd Monsanto). In the Myriad case (BRCA1) the SC Court went so far as to say they were NOT ruling on whether generically modified DNA is patent-eligible, and that would require a new case. Don't believe everything you read, even from "trustworthy" sources.