Although iam in agreement on the virus isolation argument of Stefan Lanka, I also think that an engineered pathogen could be synthesized which to me is very similar to how glyphosate resistant crops are engineered wherein a specific gene (representing the tolerance to glyphosate) of the bacterium who is unaffected by glyphosate is fused …
Although iam in agreement on the virus isolation argument of Stefan Lanka, I also think that an engineered pathogen could be synthesized which to me is very similar to how glyphosate resistant crops are engineered wherein a specific gene (representing the tolerance to glyphosate) of the bacterium who is unaffected by glyphosate is fused into the gene of the crop and thus on glyphosate application only the weeds die and not the crop
The above I think was achieved by exposing multiple bacterial strains to glyphosate and extracting those that survived and probably doing a differential analysis of the genes of glyphosate resistant strain vis a vis the others that died
I believe the above because farmers use glyphosate and there is demand for it which obviously means that it isn't killing the crop but only the weeds
If a gene of a bacteria can be fused into corn/wheat to make the crop glyphosate resistant I can identify a gene that might make the crop more susceptible to glyphosate or any other element
Now if I have identified such a susceptibility gene for glyphosate in a plant I can similarly identify the susceptibility gene for a human and now I fuse this gene into a bacteria and dope the air-conditioning filters with this bacteria (which is below 2.5 microns) so that it can get into the bloodstream via the lungs I can make the persons in that setting more susceptible to disease or probably cause a disease.
Although we don't know if this is the SARS cov 2 (so called virus) and don't have any evidence whatsoever but my question is is this possible at all? If yes then the discussion ends if no could you explain why not
Although iam in agreement on the virus isolation argument of Stefan Lanka, I also think that an engineered pathogen could be synthesized which to me is very similar to how glyphosate resistant crops are engineered wherein a specific gene (representing the tolerance to glyphosate) of the bacterium who is unaffected by glyphosate is fused into the gene of the crop and thus on glyphosate application only the weeds die and not the crop
The above I think was achieved by exposing multiple bacterial strains to glyphosate and extracting those that survived and probably doing a differential analysis of the genes of glyphosate resistant strain vis a vis the others that died
I believe the above because farmers use glyphosate and there is demand for it which obviously means that it isn't killing the crop but only the weeds
If a gene of a bacteria can be fused into corn/wheat to make the crop glyphosate resistant I can identify a gene that might make the crop more susceptible to glyphosate or any other element
Now if I have identified such a susceptibility gene for glyphosate in a plant I can similarly identify the susceptibility gene for a human and now I fuse this gene into a bacteria and dope the air-conditioning filters with this bacteria (which is below 2.5 microns) so that it can get into the bloodstream via the lungs I can make the persons in that setting more susceptible to disease or probably cause a disease.
Although we don't know if this is the SARS cov 2 (so called virus) and don't have any evidence whatsoever but my question is is this possible at all? If yes then the discussion ends if no could you explain why not