I have watched about an hour of the interview with john and carl and i was surprised that Heneghan holds that no conclusions can be drawn without doing studies for Years and years. I am sure his study on the flu drug was very important, but people are dropping like flies and he …
I have watched about an hour of the interview with john and carl and i was surprised that Heneghan holds that no conclusions can be drawn without doing studies for Years and years. I am sure his study on the flu drug was very important, but people are dropping like flies and he wants to talk about everything except that. I always admired him until now. Yes, I understand his point about evidence, but he is dead wrong about evidence as an answer to controversy, because there is lots of evidence of the lethality of Covid vaccines and other vaccines and that changes nothing as far as the actions of government and the regulatory agencies. He is also wrong about the RCTs on masks. There may only have been 3 on Covid, but there are many more looking at the utility of masks to block airborne viruses. Heneghan wants to have his cake and eat it to, he sees himself as the final word on “evidence,” yet he is at pains to narrow the scope of inquiry and ascribe the actions of the so-called regulatory agencies to incompetence. He is obfuscating in defense of the academic establishment.
Jerry Newfield
Jerry’s Substack
12 mins ago
·
edited 10 mins ago
I have watched about an hour of the interview with john and carl and i was surprised that Heneghan holds that no conclusions can be drawn without doing studies for Years and years. I am sure his study on the flu drug was very important, but people are dropping like flies and he wants to talk about everything except that. I always admired him until now. Yes, I understand his point about evidence, but he is dead wrong about evidence as an answer to controversy, because there is lots of evidence of the lethality of Covid vaccines and other vaccines and that changes nothing as far as the actions of government and the regulatory agencies. He is also wrong about the RCTs on masks. There may only have been 3 on Covid, but there are many more looking at the utility of masks to block airborne viruses. Heneghan wants to have his cake and eat it to, he sees himself as the final word on “evidence,” yet he is at pains to narrow the scope of inquiry and ascribe the actions of the so-called regulatory agencies to incompetence. He is obfuscating in defense of the academic establishment.