A mask exemption should not warrant an investigation without alleged harm.
If harm is alleged, the board is obligated to declare the finding they intend to support with an investigation. That is, if the board disagrees with a mask exemption, it needs to state the grounds upon which an exemption would not be valid; the investigation then s…
A mask exemption should not warrant an investigation without alleged harm.
If harm is alleged, the board is obligated to declare the finding they intend to support with an investigation. That is, if the board disagrees with a mask exemption, it needs to state the grounds upon which an exemption would not be valid; the investigation then substantiates or clears the allegation. Since the board has no grounds for cleaving a patient's mask exemption from a doctor, it has no place in the matter.
A mask exemption should not warrant an investigation without alleged harm.
If harm is alleged, the board is obligated to declare the finding they intend to support with an investigation. That is, if the board disagrees with a mask exemption, it needs to state the grounds upon which an exemption would not be valid; the investigation then substantiates or clears the allegation. Since the board has no grounds for cleaving a patient's mask exemption from a doctor, it has no place in the matter.