102 Comments

One more thing, with regards to using the term "adulteration" within a legal context... it may not be a good idea, take a look:

Drug & Device Law

On Expert “Adulteration” and “Misbranding” Opinions

https://www.druganddevicelawblog.com/2022/03/on-expert-adulteration-and-misbranding-opinions.html

[Finally, [the expert’s] opinions that the [the drug] was “misbranded” or “adulterated” are inadmissible legal conclusions. The Federal Rules of Evidence do not permit an expert to render conclusions of law, because such testimony cannot properly assist the jury in understanding the evidence or determining a fact in issue. ]

[[The expert’s] opinions that [the drug] was adulterated, misbranded, or false and misleading under the FDA regulations should be excluded as inadmissible legal conclusions.]

Expand full comment

If you are going to do that Steve, I recommend that some members of your team read this book, you may needed:

Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Deskbook

https://www.lawcatalog.com/drug-and-medical-device-product-liability-deskbook-12.html

Description:

[FDA-regulated products now account for an estimated one-fifth of overall economic activity in the U.S. They have also been the focus of a litigation explosion. This timely guide covers all aspects of litigation involving drugs, medical devices, vaccines and other FDA-regulated prescription products.

The Drug and Medical Device Product Liability Deskbook includes: detailed coverage of: warning-related claims and defenses; other information-based theories; strict liability; FDA-related per se liability; preemption of common law tort claims by the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and FDA regulations; class actions in drug and medical device litigation; theories of liability asserted against entities other than manufacturers; practical issues involving litigation management; the use of expert witnesses; and many other important topics. The authors include practical coverage of “what a litigator needs to know about the FDA.” You'll also find out how plaintiffs and defendants can enhance their chances for success before litigation even commences.

Book #00674; looseleaf, one volume, 1,158 pages; published in 2004, updated as needed; no additional charge for updates during your subscription. Looseleaf print subscribers receive supplements. The online edition is updated automatically. ISBN: 978-1-58852-121-7.]

Expand full comment

There should be enough relatives of those KILLED by 'EXPERIMENTAL VAX' to raise a Class Action, so go for it. We're with you all the way.

My suspicion is that it will never get to court because Pfizer are already planning a get-out strategy = BANKRUPTCY! They're already pretending to be having "financial Difficulties". Unbelievable but true!

If such a Legal Action ever got to court, you'd have to hope that Big Pharma haven't already 'got at' the judiciary! My theory, they already own the Judiciary!

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed to live longer!

Expand full comment

Tommorrow: Time To Sue Pfizer?

Nit picking I know, but tomorrow is written with one M.

Where is the proof reader, when you want one?

Yes it's time to sue Pfizer and also imprison Pfizer. Or are these psychopaths going to be allowed to get away with genocide? Also those that have pushed this "vaccine" like Bill Gates, investing $20 billion to walk away with $200 billion and predicting more manmade viruses to come in the coming years. They must all be imprisoned by decent justice system people, who have refused to be bought. The $billions in profit that big pharma and Gates and others have made, should be confiscated and a set amount of monies paid out to those that were sold the lie and have been adversely affected.

So how much would be given to the families of loved ones that died from the shot?

Something has to be done, this was deliberate and all for PROFIT, with DEPOPULATION thrown in as well and mostly western depopulation at that. They need to dilute the West first, as it will be much easier for the Great Reset to take hold.

Expand full comment

Ask your lawyers where they could raise a Grand Jury to bring charges of Criminal Negligence Causing Death. Target Fauci, Becerra, Newsom, Walensky , and possibly Lloyd Austin.

If the persecution of Donald Trump in various jurisdictions is so widespread you should be able to concentrate enough cash in one jurisdiction to get some cases going.

Expand full comment

I dream of the day when I no longer have to hear “…during Covid, I gained weight watched a lot of TV —- fill in the blank”

Expand full comment

Oh how the 'Mighty' fall and Profit becomes a past introverted delusion. If the 'Flood Gates' open with People suing Pfizer over the SV40 Adulteration, we do think that sympathy will not be with them. Speaking of adulterations, "He who lives by Greed alone, shall perish their Profits". We also have a feeling that New Zealand's new Prime Minister might be covering his Buttocks against his Citizens suing him for Jab adverse Effects, by seeking Criminal Charges with Pfizer !! And like Kelly M. Thank you eternally for pursuing the Truth.

Expand full comment

And, just today I am reading New Zealand’s new prime minister is seeking criminal charges with Pfizer. They have compelling info and tracking. Thank you for continuing this work!

Expand full comment

It's sad, but some people are permanently damaged by the vaccine but won't admit it to themselves, and certainly won't seek legal recourse. While this is disheartening, we MUST remember the propaganda so it never happens again... https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/6-ridiculous-propaganda-lines-of

Expand full comment

I know too many that got jabbed.

I'm trying to detach but it is very, very hard.

Expand full comment

Few lawyers are courageous, few are competent or "smart" even though law schools screen applicants based on high marks, which also are not a reliable metric for brilliant intellects or people of good character. There are a few before the modern generation such as Ralph Nader and Gerry Spence who showed exemplary character as attorneys. The Grisham novels and movies are not necessarily indicative of the current realities in this generation or prior ones. I hope you can find enough tough minded lawyers to pursue the many Pharma related frauds!

Expand full comment

I am SO tired! It has been three years of this crap.

Expand full comment

What about Fauci? He is one, if not thee master mind behind unleashing the vaccine bioweapons on us! Is he exempt from prosecution?

Expand full comment

Is criminal prosecution receiving any attention?

Expand full comment
Oct 25, 2023·edited Oct 25, 2023

Do you see anything BUT major incentive to cause the biggest *novel* global health crisis possible, with the EUA vaccines, in the Federal Code that specifies the TWO situations where Emergency Use Authorization may be granted?

I do not:.

***

"(c)Criteria for issuance of authorization

...(2)that, based on the totality of scientific evidence available to the Secretary, including data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, if available, it is reasonable to believe that—

(A)the product may be effective in diagnosing, treating, or preventing—

(i)such disease or condition; or

(ii)a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a product authorized under this section, approved or cleared under this chapter, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], for diagnosing, treating, or preventing such a disease or condition caused by such an agent..."

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/21/360bbb-3

***

Let me emphasize that second one:

(ii)a serious or life-threatening disease or condition CAUSED BY a product authorized under this section, approved or cleared under this chapter, or licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 262], for diagnosing, treating, or preventing such a disease or condition caused by such an agent.

***

They want to pump out new drugs at 'warp speed'...they want the biggest market of patients....what incentive is there to make a safe EUA vaccine?

Because they care? Pfft.

Expand full comment

All mRNA products should be taken off the market. From contaminated PCR swabs to any pharmaceutical containing graphene, hydrogels, heavy metals, luciferase or and or any pegylated lipid nanoparticles. graphene hydrogels have been found in dental anesthetics. This should be investigated and prosecutions should result.

Expand full comment