Vaccine Safety Research Foundation... Sorry, but I had to dig for this to know what it is... Needs to be parenthetically noted at the beginning of articles for the uninitiated like me.

Expand full comment

Wow, why doesn't the VSRF list the the injury types that are possible from the vaccine on its website?

Expand full comment

Do we have any info on births and fertility after the jab. We all know that pregnant women who took the jabs had bad outcomes. We are now at approximately one year after 20 something’s began taking the jab. Does anyone know of anyone who conceived after taking the jab and had a healthy live birth. Any OBGYNs out there who can comment one whether women are having trouble conceiving post jab? Has anyone tallied birth records lately?

Expand full comment

I do not believe Grandpa Dementia and other big-shot politicians actually were jabbed with Fauci's poison death shot.

Expand full comment

Spotted this on the "howbadismybatch" website.


an analysis of pfizer clinical trials - bio distribution studies by an industry expert


Discussion about Regulatory and Scientific Fraud in Pfizer Preclinical Studies (bitchute.com)

35 minutes of damning proof that Pfizer DOES NOT have a liability shield - it shattered the shield with FRAUD.

so, here's hoping this is evidence that can be used.

Expand full comment

I agree with one of the speakers today who basically said the legal avenue is tough to pursue. I think we need to look at other options too. For instance, many doctors are persecuted by their state medical boards. So I suggest 2 options:

1. In friendly states, encourage those state boards not to discipline doctors in "me-too" actions where there was no actual patient harmed and no complaint by an actual patient. We need this because once one state sanctions a doctor, other states tend to follow suit.

2. Figure out how to get our people on those state medical boards. For instance, in California most board members are appointed by the governor with a couple appointed by the legislature and they are generally all doctors or lawyers. It's a Dem state, any a wacky one at that, so that one is probably out. However, in Tennessee, it's a little different. They are still appointed by the governor, but 3 positions are held by "health care consumers" so there might be an opportunity to get a friendlier board (if they aren't already -- I don't know). Every state is different, and the terms of those on these boards are staggered...but maybe we need to devote some thought here to whether we can make inroads.

There are probably other potential avenues that also don't involve legal action per se. Anyone have any ideas?

Expand full comment

A BIG problem here, there are so very many many that were injured but are unaware that it was the vaccine that caused it. How do we reach everyone that was truly INJURED and their doctors and or their nurses never said anything to them and never notified vaers. I myself know of quite a few, that still do not believe the vaccine was anything but good! REALLY! How do we reach them??

Expand full comment

OMG! The twisted agenda and corruption knows no bounds. Thank you! There is much to digest in your post. My former Intelligence Officer wife told me yesterday that we must have gone through a portal and are literally now residing in an alternate universe where there is no longer a balance between good and evil. I’m beginning to believe her.

Expand full comment

That’s exactly what I saying. It starts with a trickle and when the hungry lawyers realize the trough filled with all the money Pharma has made. Almost 100 Billion Pfizer alone. There is also vast amounts of wealth that the globalist Billionaires that are exposed as conspirators in these crimes have. It will be a gold rush for lawyers and hopefully some restitution for the victims.

Expand full comment

"Big Pharma companies have a total and complete exemption from lawsuits as a result of any and all injury and death that result from taking their experimental injection. This has led many vaccine injured to believe that they have no recourse to civil "

Hi Kirsch,

This is literally Constitutionally unlawful, as per the Seventh amendment the Constitution states civil lawsuits must preserve the right of trial by jury. The current system uses "special masters" which are not Constitutionally valid.

I drafted a set of proposals on how a lawsuit could nullify legal immunity, but Children's Health Defense oddly seemed uninterested in striking at the heart of the legal fallacy. I know no State governor nor politician will be interested in spearheading this because they've all signed on. I've never taken the shot, so I personally don't have grounds to contest the legality of the ruling.

I documented the various legal issues with the "immunity to liability" law here (available in .odt and .pdf format):


If you were able to fight the case all the way to the Supreme Court and have them strike down civil lawsuit immunity it would deal the biggest death blow to corrupt pharmaceutical companies in centuries.

Expand full comment



April 23rd to June 19th, 2022

Full day events, live on stage!

🔹Dr. Reiner Fuellmich

🔹Dr. Judy Mikovits

🔹Dr. Richard M. Fleming

🔹Patrick Wood

Book now at:


Expand full comment

I think Mr. Kirsch has always encouraged everyone to share and post on any social media, but sure his encouragement would be appreciated.

Expand full comment

I've been Tweeting all of Steve's articles, so far none have been taken down or cancelled or they suspended me. If every reader would Tweet each article, think of the increased coverage we could do on the internet.

Expand full comment

Holding those accountable is like sqeezing jello. Push forward!

Expand full comment
Mar 31, 2022·edited Mar 31, 2022

Can't they file under 21 CRF 50.23 - Informed Consent? Also, I thought that if they were mandatory for employees, then it is a "condition of employment", and they can file under that. Actual text from Q&A on OSHA website: Q:"If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reaction to the vaccine recordable?" A: "If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7."

Expand full comment