Vaccine Safety Research Foundation... Sorry, but I had to dig for this to know what it is... Needs to be parenthetically noted at the beginning of articles for the uninitiated like me.
Do we have any info on births and fertility after the jab. We all know that pregnant women who took the jabs had bad outcomes. We are now at approximately one year after 20 something’s began taking the jab. Does anyone know of anyone who conceived after taking the jab and had a healthy live birth. Any OBGYNs out there who can comment one whether women are having trouble conceiving post jab? Has anyone tallied birth records lately?
I agree with one of the speakers today who basically said the legal avenue is tough to pursue. I think we need to look at other options too. For instance, many doctors are persecuted by their state medical boards. So I suggest 2 options:
1. In friendly states, encourage those state boards not to discipline doctors in "me-too" actions where there was no actual patient harmed and no complaint by an actual patient. We need this because once one state sanctions a doctor, other states tend to follow suit.
2. Figure out how to get our people on those state medical boards. For instance, in California most board members are appointed by the governor with a couple appointed by the legislature and they are generally all doctors or lawyers. It's a Dem state, any a wacky one at that, so that one is probably out. However, in Tennessee, it's a little different. They are still appointed by the governor, but 3 positions are held by "health care consumers" so there might be an opportunity to get a friendlier board (if they aren't already -- I don't know). Every state is different, and the terms of those on these boards are staggered...but maybe we need to devote some thought here to whether we can make inroads.
There are probably other potential avenues that also don't involve legal action per se. Anyone have any ideas?
A BIG problem here, there are so very many many that were injured but are unaware that it was the vaccine that caused it. How do we reach everyone that was truly INJURED and their doctors and or their nurses never said anything to them and never notified vaers. I myself know of quite a few, that still do not believe the vaccine was anything but good! REALLY! How do we reach them??
No f&cking clue!!! Everyone one I mentioned my unusual symptoms after “V” to is absolutely astounded! Yet they’re complaining about “unusual” new medical happenings in their own body. How dumb are ppl to their own health? Seriously. Very smart well educated ppl… oh right they’re indoctrinated early on and on and on. I’ve tried and besides doing valid blood work (which may never happen b/c labs are now compromised) or scans by honest health care systems (do those exist) we will never ever know. We are executing ourselves with safe and effective Vs to protect those around us that we don’t even f&cking know. Obviously I’m slightly irritated and over this shit
OMG! The twisted agenda and corruption knows no bounds. Thank you! There is much to digest in your post. My former Intelligence Officer wife told me yesterday that we must have gone through a portal and are literally now residing in an alternate universe where there is no longer a balance between good and evil. I’m beginning to believe her.
That’s exactly what I saying. It starts with a trickle and when the hungry lawyers realize the trough filled with all the money Pharma has made. Almost 100 Billion Pfizer alone. There is also vast amounts of wealth that the globalist Billionaires that are exposed as conspirators in these crimes have. It will be a gold rush for lawyers and hopefully some restitution for the victims.
"Big Pharma companies have a total and complete exemption from lawsuits as a result of any and all injury and death that result from taking their experimental injection. This has led many vaccine injured to believe that they have no recourse to civil "
Hi Kirsch,
This is literally Constitutionally unlawful, as per the Seventh amendment the Constitution states civil lawsuits must preserve the right of trial by jury. The current system uses "special masters" which are not Constitutionally valid.
I drafted a set of proposals on how a lawsuit could nullify legal immunity, but Children's Health Defense oddly seemed uninterested in striking at the heart of the legal fallacy. I know no State governor nor politician will be interested in spearheading this because they've all signed on. I've never taken the shot, so I personally don't have grounds to contest the legality of the ruling.
I documented the various legal issues with the "immunity to liability" law here (available in .odt and .pdf format):
If you were able to fight the case all the way to the Supreme Court and have them strike down civil lawsuit immunity it would deal the biggest death blow to corrupt pharmaceutical companies in centuries.
there is and always has been a statute on the Federal books about mandating EUA!! The shots and the masks were always EUA(NEVER FULL APPROVAL!! FDA LIED!) So that is 1 way but also with all the new information coming out against Pfizer from FOIA, it definitely looks like MEDICAL FRAUD!!! Pfizer knew when it released the vaccine that there were 1291 severe reactions that they saw and they never , NEVER told anyone!!! That sounds like FRAUD to me, they knowingly and willingly let it come out!!! LOOK IT P! IT IS ALL THERE FOR THE WINNNG!!!
I’m interested in this topic too. I’ve had conversations with a town police officer and county sheriff in recent weeks, and both told me they’ve been instructed, by the state Attorney General and county District Attorneys, not to pursue investigating reports of criminal acts related to Covid-19 mitigations. They said verbally instructed (I asked if they’d received written instructions and they said no.) So, now I’m trying to use FOIA tools to find out if there have been written instructions distributed among prosecutors, police, sheriffs and judges in the last two years.
Merger of public health and law enforcement is a thing that Todd Callender has been talking about a lot — legally executed through 2002 Homeland Security Act, 2004 Project Bioshield Act, 2005 PREP Act, and 2006 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act.
Also relevant is Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts opinion, in an early Constitutional case (South Bay Pentecostal v. Newsom, May 2020)
that the judicial branch may not provide constitutional review of governmental executive and legislative acts during a declared emergency. Roberts claimed it was because judges are appointed, and so farther from the electorate than legislators and executives.
But more likely, the source of his opinion was a section in the PREP Act of 2005 (42 USC247d-6d(b)(7) that “no court of the United States, or of any State, shall have subject matter jurisdiction to review, whether by mandamus or otherwise, any action of the Secretary” of Health and Human Services, under a “declaration” made by the Secretary. So Congress essentially granted US-HHS Secretary dictatorial powers that are triggered as soon as the Secretary declares a public health emergency, and at the same time, Congress rendered itself and all US courts impotent to depose the HHS dictator once he or she has claimed that ruling power.
I've been Tweeting all of Steve's articles, so far none have been taken down or cancelled or they suspended me. If every reader would Tweet each article, think of the increased coverage we could do on the internet.
Can't they file under 21 CRF 50.23 - Informed Consent? Also, I thought that if they were mandatory for employees, then it is a "condition of employment", and they can file under that. Actual text from Q&A on OSHA website: Q:"If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reaction to the vaccine recordable?" A: "If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7."
So long as the shots are classified as Emergency Use Authorization “countermeasures,” under the Project Bioshield Act of 2004 (amendments to 1944 Public Health Service Act and 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act), they are by legal definition not part of any “clinical investigation,” despite the fact that the Phase 3 clinical trials will not be finished for quite awhile.
See 21 USC 360bbb-3(k)
Found that two days ago while reading the statutes.
It’s relevant to the legal arguments about how employers and governments can ‘mandate’ shots, without running afoul of Nuremberg Code and 45 CFR 46.116 provisions for informed consent for experimental subjects without duress or coercion.
Combined with a Slip Opinion issued by a Deputy Attorney General July 6, 2021, and the Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital June 12, 2021 ruling from Southern District of Texas, it’s legislative, regulatory and judicial nullification of informed consent principles for US citizens.
Bridges case is currently on appeal in Fifth Circuit - plaintiff brief filed in November 2021, hospital brief filed in late January 2022.
The judge in Bridges set several terrible precedents on June 12, 2021, including that "the hospital's employees are not participants in a human trial. They are licensed doctors, nurses, medical technicians and staff members." The implication being, nurses and doctors are not human, and therefore can't be human subjects of medical experiments. And the judge said the vaxxes can't be construed as violating Nuremberg, because the hospital is a private employer, not a government.
Deputy AG Dawn Johnsen in her July 6, 2021 "slip opinion," then cited the Bridges ruling as dispositive, to conclude that any entity can mandate any producted granted EUA status by HHS/FDA.
Looks like Title 21 is regulations specific to FDA division of HHS, under heading of "Food and Drugs," and Title 45 is regulations related to Health and Human Services as a whole, under heading of "Public Welfare." Not sure how they relate to each other.
Vaccine Safety Research Foundation... Sorry, but I had to dig for this to know what it is... Needs to be parenthetically noted at the beginning of articles for the uninitiated like me.
Wow, why doesn't the VSRF list the the injury types that are possible from the vaccine on its website?
Do we have any info on births and fertility after the jab. We all know that pregnant women who took the jabs had bad outcomes. We are now at approximately one year after 20 something’s began taking the jab. Does anyone know of anyone who conceived after taking the jab and had a healthy live birth. Any OBGYNs out there who can comment one whether women are having trouble conceiving post jab? Has anyone tallied birth records lately?
I do not believe Grandpa Dementia and other big-shot politicians actually were jabbed with Fauci's poison death shot.
When he got his saline booster, you can see there is no vial present, only a syringe.
https://rumble.com/vz5upp-biden-awkwardly-ignores-reporters-shouting-questions-while-getting-booster-.html?mref=6zof&mc=dgip3&ep=2
Spotted this on the "howbadismybatch" website.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/yM0wdzWw5Mzs/
an analysis of pfizer clinical trials - bio distribution studies by an industry expert
FRAUD
Discussion about Regulatory and Scientific Fraud in Pfizer Preclinical Studies (bitchute.com)
35 minutes of damning proof that Pfizer DOES NOT have a liability shield - it shattered the shield with FRAUD.
so, here's hoping this is evidence that can be used.
I agree with one of the speakers today who basically said the legal avenue is tough to pursue. I think we need to look at other options too. For instance, many doctors are persecuted by their state medical boards. So I suggest 2 options:
1. In friendly states, encourage those state boards not to discipline doctors in "me-too" actions where there was no actual patient harmed and no complaint by an actual patient. We need this because once one state sanctions a doctor, other states tend to follow suit.
2. Figure out how to get our people on those state medical boards. For instance, in California most board members are appointed by the governor with a couple appointed by the legislature and they are generally all doctors or lawyers. It's a Dem state, any a wacky one at that, so that one is probably out. However, in Tennessee, it's a little different. They are still appointed by the governor, but 3 positions are held by "health care consumers" so there might be an opportunity to get a friendlier board (if they aren't already -- I don't know). Every state is different, and the terms of those on these boards are staggered...but maybe we need to devote some thought here to whether we can make inroads.
There are probably other potential avenues that also don't involve legal action per se. Anyone have any ideas?
A BIG problem here, there are so very many many that were injured but are unaware that it was the vaccine that caused it. How do we reach everyone that was truly INJURED and their doctors and or their nurses never said anything to them and never notified vaers. I myself know of quite a few, that still do not believe the vaccine was anything but good! REALLY! How do we reach them??
No f&cking clue!!! Everyone one I mentioned my unusual symptoms after “V” to is absolutely astounded! Yet they’re complaining about “unusual” new medical happenings in their own body. How dumb are ppl to their own health? Seriously. Very smart well educated ppl… oh right they’re indoctrinated early on and on and on. I’ve tried and besides doing valid blood work (which may never happen b/c labs are now compromised) or scans by honest health care systems (do those exist) we will never ever know. We are executing ourselves with safe and effective Vs to protect those around us that we don’t even f&cking know. Obviously I’m slightly irritated and over this shit
There are first line doctors available that maybe can help you, I would look them up and good luck to you!
OMG! The twisted agenda and corruption knows no bounds. Thank you! There is much to digest in your post. My former Intelligence Officer wife told me yesterday that we must have gone through a portal and are literally now residing in an alternate universe where there is no longer a balance between good and evil. I’m beginning to believe her.
That’s exactly what I saying. It starts with a trickle and when the hungry lawyers realize the trough filled with all the money Pharma has made. Almost 100 Billion Pfizer alone. There is also vast amounts of wealth that the globalist Billionaires that are exposed as conspirators in these crimes have. It will be a gold rush for lawyers and hopefully some restitution for the victims.
"Big Pharma companies have a total and complete exemption from lawsuits as a result of any and all injury and death that result from taking their experimental injection. This has led many vaccine injured to believe that they have no recourse to civil "
Hi Kirsch,
This is literally Constitutionally unlawful, as per the Seventh amendment the Constitution states civil lawsuits must preserve the right of trial by jury. The current system uses "special masters" which are not Constitutionally valid.
I drafted a set of proposals on how a lawsuit could nullify legal immunity, but Children's Health Defense oddly seemed uninterested in striking at the heart of the legal fallacy. I know no State governor nor politician will be interested in spearheading this because they've all signed on. I've never taken the shot, so I personally don't have grounds to contest the legality of the ruling.
I documented the various legal issues with the "immunity to liability" law here (available in .odt and .pdf format):
https://gitlab.com/TheUnderdog/general-research/-/tree/main/ViolatesDueProcess
If you were able to fight the case all the way to the Supreme Court and have them strike down civil lawsuit immunity it would deal the biggest death blow to corrupt pharmaceutical companies in centuries.
there is and always has been a statute on the Federal books about mandating EUA!! The shots and the masks were always EUA(NEVER FULL APPROVAL!! FDA LIED!) So that is 1 way but also with all the new information coming out against Pfizer from FOIA, it definitely looks like MEDICAL FRAUD!!! Pfizer knew when it released the vaccine that there were 1291 severe reactions that they saw and they never , NEVER told anyone!!! That sounds like FRAUD to me, they knowingly and willingly let it come out!!! LOOK IT P! IT IS ALL THERE FOR THE WINNNG!!!
I’m interested in this topic too. I’ve had conversations with a town police officer and county sheriff in recent weeks, and both told me they’ve been instructed, by the state Attorney General and county District Attorneys, not to pursue investigating reports of criminal acts related to Covid-19 mitigations. They said verbally instructed (I asked if they’d received written instructions and they said no.) So, now I’m trying to use FOIA tools to find out if there have been written instructions distributed among prosecutors, police, sheriffs and judges in the last two years.
Merger of public health and law enforcement is a thing that Todd Callender has been talking about a lot — legally executed through 2002 Homeland Security Act, 2004 Project Bioshield Act, 2005 PREP Act, and 2006 Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act.
Also relevant is Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts opinion, in an early Constitutional case (South Bay Pentecostal v. Newsom, May 2020)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/19A1044
that the judicial branch may not provide constitutional review of governmental executive and legislative acts during a declared emergency. Roberts claimed it was because judges are appointed, and so farther from the electorate than legislators and executives.
But more likely, the source of his opinion was a section in the PREP Act of 2005 (42 USC247d-6d(b)(7) that “no court of the United States, or of any State, shall have subject matter jurisdiction to review, whether by mandamus or otherwise, any action of the Secretary” of Health and Human Services, under a “declaration” made by the Secretary. So Congress essentially granted US-HHS Secretary dictatorial powers that are triggered as soon as the Secretary declares a public health emergency, and at the same time, Congress rendered itself and all US courts impotent to depose the HHS dictator once he or she has claimed that ruling power.
CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY TOUR, USA
https://www.bitchute.com/video/bDVRRZ34mTpT/
April 23rd to June 19th, 2022
Full day events, live on stage!
🔹Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
🔹Dr. Judy Mikovits
🔹Dr. Richard M. Fleming
🔹Patrick Wood
Book now at:
www.CrimesAgainstHumanityTour.com
I think Mr. Kirsch has always encouraged everyone to share and post on any social media, but sure his encouragement would be appreciated.
I've been Tweeting all of Steve's articles, so far none have been taken down or cancelled or they suspended me. If every reader would Tweet each article, think of the increased coverage we could do on the internet.
Holding those accountable is like sqeezing jello. Push forward!
Can't they file under 21 CRF 50.23 - Informed Consent? Also, I thought that if they were mandatory for employees, then it is a "condition of employment", and they can file under that. Actual text from Q&A on OSHA website: Q:"If I require my employees to take the COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of their employment, are adverse reaction to the vaccine recordable?" A: "If you require your employees to be vaccinated as a condition of employment (i.e., for work-related reasons), then any adverse reaction to the COVID-19 vaccine is work-related. The adverse reaction is recordable if it is a new case under 29 CFR 1904.6 and meets one or more of the general recording criteria in 29 CFR 1904.7."
So long as the shots are classified as Emergency Use Authorization “countermeasures,” under the Project Bioshield Act of 2004 (amendments to 1944 Public Health Service Act and 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act), they are by legal definition not part of any “clinical investigation,” despite the fact that the Phase 3 clinical trials will not be finished for quite awhile.
See 21 USC 360bbb-3(k)
Found that two days ago while reading the statutes.
It’s relevant to the legal arguments about how employers and governments can ‘mandate’ shots, without running afoul of Nuremberg Code and 45 CFR 46.116 provisions for informed consent for experimental subjects without duress or coercion.
Combined with a Slip Opinion issued by a Deputy Attorney General July 6, 2021, and the Bridges v. Houston Methodist Hospital June 12, 2021 ruling from Southern District of Texas, it’s legislative, regulatory and judicial nullification of informed consent principles for US citizens.
Bridges case is currently on appeal in Fifth Circuit - plaintiff brief filed in November 2021, hospital brief filed in late January 2022.
The judge in Bridges set several terrible precedents on June 12, 2021, including that "the hospital's employees are not participants in a human trial. They are licensed doctors, nurses, medical technicians and staff members." The implication being, nurses and doctors are not human, and therefore can't be human subjects of medical experiments. And the judge said the vaxxes can't be construed as violating Nuremberg, because the hospital is a private employer, not a government.
Deputy AG Dawn Johnsen in her July 6, 2021 "slip opinion," then cited the Bridges ruling as dispositive, to conclude that any entity can mandate any producted granted EUA status by HHS/FDA.
Very informative. Thank you!
Looks like Title 21 is regulations specific to FDA division of HHS, under heading of "Food and Drugs," and Title 45 is regulations related to Health and Human Services as a whole, under heading of "Public Welfare." Not sure how they relate to each other.
You Can’t Say He Didn’t Tell You
https://theagingviking.substack.com/p/you-cant-say-he-didnt-tell-you
Exactly Viking. More than enough evidence out there to prove what happened and who was involved. They killed my father. I will not be letting that go.