11 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Maxxx's avatar

Everyone needs to remember that if Pharma omitted, lied or falsified any data that was submitted to get approval or if they omitted, minimized or failed to fully disclose the risk of harmful side effects it totally cancels indemnification. Also the data trail from Mr Gates as a principal stockholder makes his 200 Billion dollar fortune at risk as well as all other Globalists that have pushed their homicidal agenda through these so called vaccines liable as well. Lastly these shots are not vaccines they are mRNA technology that these psychopathic pigs have labeled vaccines. People need to stop calling these mRNA SHOTS vaccines and call them what they really are, toxic bio weapons used to push the depopulation agenda that Gates and many other globalists in league with the monster Klaus Schwab have been talking about publicly for more than two decades.

Expand full comment
Fed-up-with-it-all's avatar

Unfortunately, the CEO of Pfizer stated in the very beginning that the injection did NOT prevent one from GETTING covid nor did it prevent one from TRANSMITTING covid. Yet people did NOT listen to him. And, of course, s&msmedia only allowed that one couple second airtime and you haven't heard it since (just like those DJT is innocent statements).

Now, the falsification is a different issue; however, when the data was submitted, according to the 'unintentional' release of a document recently, Pfizer included a couple "out" statement regarding the data as saying it was "incomplete" and giving "reasons" why it "might be inaccurate" as "not enough time has passed" to "compile and process", etc. So they have "weaseled" their way out of falsification at the moment, at least for that document. I am sure they had a dozen attorneys look over the doc before submission.

I agree, and have been harping since the beginning, that we need to call them EXPERIMENTAL mRNA GENE THERAPY INJECTIONS because that IS what they ARE. However, that is a mouthful, and even longer for two-finger typists to key in. The term "VAX" has become popular instead of "vaccine", and I have started using it; however, I do prefer "jab", "shot", and "injection" when I do not spell it out. I do love putting "EXPERIMENTAL" as a reminder to people that it is NOT approved by the FDA because it has NOT gone through the entire process that comes before approval. Most especially, it has not had time to go through the long-term SAFETY & EFFICACY studies REQUIRED for approval.

That said, anyone who got the injection SHOULD have been given an informed consent form to sign (with the list of KNOWN adverse effects) BECAUSE they are AUTOMATICALLY GUINEA PIGS as they are AUTOMATICALLY ENROLLED IN THE RESEARCH STUDY of the EXPERIMENTAL mRNA GENE THERAPY DRUG for 2 1/2 years. To me, this means that their name and medical information is in the hands of the company whose shot they got. Plus, depending on where & when each group received a different vial of shots (according to Dr. Yeadon who used to be a VP at Pfizer) with each vial having a different strength of the drug. After all, you don't know what the concentration needs to be in a NEW EXPERIMENTAL DRUG until you TEST IT.

And dem states want 12 year olds to be able to evaluate and consent to being in a medical experiment of this nature.

CA proposes new laws (being voted on sometime around Apr 4-6, 2022 (Freedom Truckers are on their way from DC https://thepeoplesconvoy.org/ ) most about the vax.

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces//billSearchClient.xhtml

SB866:

SECTION 1. Section 6931 is added to the Family Code, to read:

6931. (a) A <b>minor 12 years of age or older</b> may <b>consent</b> to a vaccine that is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration and meets the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (ACIP) <b>without the consent of the parent or guardian of the minor</b>.

This bill is saying a minor between the ages of 12 and 18 can give consent to accept an experimental drug not yet tested for long-term safety and efficacy nor approved for regular use by the FDA without the consent of their parent or guardian.

What does this mean in the scheme of things? It says, in effect, that a child ages 12 and up has the ABILITY of an adult to RESEARCH available scientific literature, to EVALUATE the literature to establish the current safety and efficacy of an experimental drug, to REVIEW the known adverse effects of the drug and COMPARE that to their own known medical history, then to ASSESS the risk involved in participating in the experiment by consenting to getting the injection of the experimental drug.

I don't know about you, but I look around me and see that 60 to 70% of people over the age of 18 don't seem to have that ability. Do they expect me to believe that a child between the ages of 12 and 18 has that ability?

OK, so IF this bill passes (OK, it's California, land of fruit & nuts, of course they'll pass it), what does this truly mean?

It means, for all intents and purposes, that children aged 12 and up, have medical control of their bodies.

If they have medical control of their bodies, does it not make sense they they would also have TOTAL control of their bodies?

Let's see, TOTAL control as in the control to CONSENT to ANYTHING in which their BODY is involved.

LIKE SEX?

LET'S GET A HEAD START ON LEGALIZING PEDOPHELIA.

Step 1, give children the right to take an experimental drug without parent or guardian consent.

Step 2, extend that to children have a right to decide what happens to their own bodies no matter what the parent says.

Step 3, "SHE/HE ASKED FOR IT".

https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/81d5985ca7e49513b0ed56f90aeaf43a6003a46685b541f74f7e6cab02bd42a6.png

Expand full comment
Abbagails's avatar

And they have talked openly for years about depopulation, and also mentioned using a vaccine to take out us “useless eaters “.

Expand full comment
Maxxx's avatar

Exactly! They don’t even try to hide their agenda. This war against humanity will not stop until they face justice.

Expand full comment
Jillian Wells's avatar

Exactly Max, I watched a well known expert Professor stating that these 💉are mechanics that rob your immune and DNA, and if they can push 💉💉💉💉more into you, the plan is you’ll be forced to 💉every month or so, just to keep you alive and of course the chips in you will controlled by ‘them’, so your brain is controlled, and if you don’t think and comply to them, they zap you dead. Now, is that enough to wage a war against them, I bl….dy well thinks so. What is wrong with 🙊🙈🙉people. ❤️🙏

Expand full comment
Maxxx's avatar

It’s a real lack of critical thinking skills. So many people don’t read any more, they are spoon fed propaganda by legacy media and social media. It really is astonishing how so many seemingly intelligent educated people actually become glassy eyed when confronted with the truth. How many people have to die and be maimed before these monsters are hunted down and brought to justice?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 31, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Maxxx's avatar

The civil legal path is about all we have at the moment. It has become apparent that the country’s attorney general is compromised . A real flaw that this position is a political appointment. There have been millions of families damaged by these injections. It will take an avalanche of civil litigation to fully expose the facts concerning how toxic these shots really are. It has already been revealed by whistleblowers and esteemed Physicians and ethical scientists that this mRNA technology is toxic and that Pharma, CDC, NIH, NIAID, FDA have lied and suppressed so much data about the trials. It seems most people have accepted that Pharma’s indemnification is valid. It’s not. I fully agree that the Constitution should be wielded like a weapon against the perpetrators in this country. Exposure and litigation can bury these people.

Expand full comment
Wendy madan perkins's avatar

Wow, Maxxx you are really bright, and a joy to read. Your clearheaded thinking and passion shines through. Thank you 💖👩🏼‍🌾🎨🦋

Expand full comment
Maxxx's avatar

It has become very gratifying feeling to find like minded people through these posts. Before this outlet I thought they had disapeared

Expand full comment
Wendy madan perkins's avatar

Precisely! And, an obvious point as to why so many submitted to their own demise…censorship & lies. I knew in February 2020, after reading the breakdown (of this SARS) from India that something was not right…this looked like a deliberate chimera bio-weapon! I told my family & wrote a supplement protocol, etc etc. My confusion, like yours, is that others do not see this for what it is…and my peers (70 yr olds) STILL are terrified! So, yes, it’s tremendously gratifying to find a home in the comfort of ‘conspiracy theorists’! I have to laugh, before CV, I was a bleeding heart liberal but always anti-establishment (still a health nut, never trusted the institutions)…liberal, yes, but not politically…they are bat-shit crazy 😝 😂.

Anyway, I just want to preserve the constitution for my grandchildren (I bought everyone in my family a copy) and will fight for their deserved freedom.

Thanks again, Maxxx…look forward to your clearheaded musings!

💖👩🏼‍🌾🎨🦋

Expand full comment