No one wants to go after Moderna. They have now geared up to produce many more new mRNA toxic inoculations. So the lawsuits focus on Pfizer, but those are just cover because the entire operation, and most likely all subsequent operations, because they will be covered under PREP Act and Emergency Declarations, so Pfizer while it might suf…
No one wants to go after Moderna. They have now geared up to produce many more new mRNA toxic inoculations. So the lawsuits focus on Pfizer, but those are just cover because the entire operation, and most likely all subsequent operations, because they will be covered under PREP Act and Emergency Declarations, so Pfizer while it might suffer some nasty headlines, will never be held accountable. Pfizer though looks to be the poor man out because all the current money seems to be headed in Moderna's direction. I think this is because they only want one public private partnership to manufacture the mRNA bioweapons. Competition is just too messy for the globalists. It always did stand to reason that Moderna's C19 bioweapon was more dangerous due to the dosage or spike protein payload. How much DNA contamination is in their shot; with more spike protein present, does that not also mean more lipid nanoparticle present, that being of course also dangerous since it is causing so much zeta potential disruption due to the very positive charge. ... just questions....
No one wants to go after Moderna. They have now geared up to produce many more new mRNA toxic inoculations. So the lawsuits focus on Pfizer, but those are just cover because the entire operation, and most likely all subsequent operations, because they will be covered under PREP Act and Emergency Declarations, so Pfizer while it might suffer some nasty headlines, will never be held accountable. Pfizer though looks to be the poor man out because all the current money seems to be headed in Moderna's direction. I think this is because they only want one public private partnership to manufacture the mRNA bioweapons. Competition is just too messy for the globalists. It always did stand to reason that Moderna's C19 bioweapon was more dangerous due to the dosage or spike protein payload. How much DNA contamination is in their shot; with more spike protein present, does that not also mean more lipid nanoparticle present, that being of course also dangerous since it is causing so much zeta potential disruption due to the very positive charge. ... just questions....