I expect that the surveyed, COVID-jab skeptics also are less likely to over-attribute deaths to COVID. So if an extra large family member goes into the hospital for DKA for the 3rd time, gets a positive routine test for COVID, then subsequently dies, the skeptics might be more likely admit that the out-of-control-diabetes contributed to …
I expect that the surveyed, COVID-jab skeptics also are less likely to over-attribute deaths to COVID. So if an extra large family member goes into the hospital for DKA for the 3rd time, gets a positive routine test for COVID, then subsequently dies, the skeptics might be more likely admit that the out-of-control-diabetes contributed to the death.
So many confounders exist in surveys, but this is all we have, since governments and their affiliates are hiding data and/or misinterpreting it.
"Experts" seem unwilling take Steve Kirsch up on his data, and offer countervailing evidence. Pfizer asked to hide their pre-market data for 75 years. These
behaviors tell us that Steve Kirsch's work is a vital service to humanity, even if it does not meet the idealized and unavailable standards which are being waved at us to counteract it.
Yes this is EXACTLY why i asked Steve to further isolate the poll. I took a full load of STATS in college. Im no expert but it seems to me that the respondents whose family & friends died in the hospital would be biased unless they were aware of the Killing Fields Thus the need IMO to further drill down by asking the simple questions : 1: Did your lived one die in a hospital ? 2: Do you know for sure if they were given Remdesivir or ventilation ? And lastly 3: Do you know if the decedent had organ failure ( likely Remdesivir). Im fairly certain once those questions are properly asked we will find out MOST or all died from murder.
Organ failure can be caused by a lot of things. While remdesivir was pretty useless, waste of money, and the liquid form was to be excluded in kidney failure, it is not the poison that killed everyone. Many remdesivir patients were able to leave the hospital through the front door.
For one, the pharmacists were supposed to talk doctors down from the drug in cases of the patient having COVID over 7 days, kidney or liver impairment. This is because people had already learned it was a mess for the ultra dehydrated Ebola patients who had preexisting organ failure. Two, the people “dying of COVID” generally had numerous comorbidities. Three, applying the ventilators right away (initially with the idea of protecting staff), was a bad move. Isolating patients from visitors was the worst move, in terms of patient outcome. Second worst was denying the drugs that were more effective.
I expect that the surveyed, COVID-jab skeptics also are less likely to over-attribute deaths to COVID. So if an extra large family member goes into the hospital for DKA for the 3rd time, gets a positive routine test for COVID, then subsequently dies, the skeptics might be more likely admit that the out-of-control-diabetes contributed to the death.
So many confounders exist in surveys, but this is all we have, since governments and their affiliates are hiding data and/or misinterpreting it.
"Experts" seem unwilling take Steve Kirsch up on his data, and offer countervailing evidence. Pfizer asked to hide their pre-market data for 75 years. These
behaviors tell us that Steve Kirsch's work is a vital service to humanity, even if it does not meet the idealized and unavailable standards which are being waved at us to counteract it.
Yes this is EXACTLY why i asked Steve to further isolate the poll. I took a full load of STATS in college. Im no expert but it seems to me that the respondents whose family & friends died in the hospital would be biased unless they were aware of the Killing Fields Thus the need IMO to further drill down by asking the simple questions : 1: Did your lived one die in a hospital ? 2: Do you know for sure if they were given Remdesivir or ventilation ? And lastly 3: Do you know if the decedent had organ failure ( likely Remdesivir). Im fairly certain once those questions are properly asked we will find out MOST or all died from murder.
Organ failure can be caused by a lot of things. While remdesivir was pretty useless, waste of money, and the liquid form was to be excluded in kidney failure, it is not the poison that killed everyone. Many remdesivir patients were able to leave the hospital through the front door.
For one, the pharmacists were supposed to talk doctors down from the drug in cases of the patient having COVID over 7 days, kidney or liver impairment. This is because people had already learned it was a mess for the ultra dehydrated Ebola patients who had preexisting organ failure. Two, the people “dying of COVID” generally had numerous comorbidities. Three, applying the ventilators right away (initially with the idea of protecting staff), was a bad move. Isolating patients from visitors was the worst move, in terms of patient outcome. Second worst was denying the drugs that were more effective.