But there's a big kinda 'random' thing here. The chances of hospitalisation. You see there was/is no rigour to being hospitalised. Either hospitalised at all or hospitalised 'for covid'.
The 'for covid' thing gets much press even from critics like Kirsch. They claim many simply had a flu or whatever. That they got covid in hospital. That …
But there's a big kinda 'random' thing here. The chances of hospitalisation. You see there was/is no rigour to being hospitalised. Either hospitalised at all or hospitalised 'for covid'.
The 'for covid' thing gets much press even from critics like Kirsch. They claim many simply had a flu or whatever. That they got covid in hospital. That there is no covid. and so on.
We we can't have a reliable understanding of what it means to have a cohort that were hospitalised 'for covid'.
And similar applies to hospitalisations in any case.
The clear fact is that your risk of being hospitalised is a kinda 'political' risk. It depends on local politics.
And generally they went lunatic and hospitalised everyone. Which would effectively mask any true clinical needs. Is another aspect. Which should be clear enough from the records - if they really did that, as I say, hospitalised everyone madly - then hospitalisation numbers should have soared.
Keep in mind that the diagnosis of "Covid" has been so fraudulent (PCR >40) since the onset of the plandemic that analysis of any type is effectively futile.
But there's a big kinda 'random' thing here. The chances of hospitalisation. You see there was/is no rigour to being hospitalised. Either hospitalised at all or hospitalised 'for covid'.
The 'for covid' thing gets much press even from critics like Kirsch. They claim many simply had a flu or whatever. That they got covid in hospital. That there is no covid. and so on.
We we can't have a reliable understanding of what it means to have a cohort that were hospitalised 'for covid'.
And similar applies to hospitalisations in any case.
The clear fact is that your risk of being hospitalised is a kinda 'political' risk. It depends on local politics.
And generally they went lunatic and hospitalised everyone. Which would effectively mask any true clinical needs. Is another aspect. Which should be clear enough from the records - if they really did that, as I say, hospitalised everyone madly - then hospitalisation numbers should have soared.
Keep in mind that the diagnosis of "Covid" has been so fraudulent (PCR >40) since the onset of the plandemic that analysis of any type is effectively futile.