I guess the point is that since 55% of each group was boosted, for example, and both groups came from the same VA population, we can say for sure that being boosted isn't any better at keeping you out of the hospital for Covid than it is at keeping you out for the flu. And if we assume it's no good for the flu, then we can say it also mu…
I guess the point is that since 55% of each group was boosted, for example, and both groups came from the same VA population, we can say for sure that being boosted isn't any better at keeping you out of the hospital for Covid than it is at keeping you out for the flu. And if we assume it's no good for the flu, then we can say it also must be no good for Covid. I guess I'm not confident enough about that to totally agree yet. What confounders might there be?
I guess the point is that since 55% of each group was boosted, for example, and both groups came from the same VA population, we can say for sure that being boosted isn't any better at keeping you out of the hospital for Covid than it is at keeping you out for the flu. And if we assume it's no good for the flu, then we can say it also must be no good for Covid. I guess I'm not confident enough about that to totally agree yet. What confounders might there be?
Remember Kurt,
the 'vax' makers demand ZERO LIABILITY for their poisons! Isn't that convincing enough?
Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed since 2019 - never again!