Comorbidity differences perhaps? Nah, I'm not buying it and I'll show you why. Also, new New Zealand FOIA results show a 5X increase in < age 40 in cardiac ER calls post vax rollout!
What no-one will say out loud is this was a b!0 Weapon. What kept me from getting the jabs was a Dr. Cahill out of Ireland posted a video at the beginning, telling that they had worked with this material for 10 years and could never get it past animal trials. The reason was simple, after 2 years all the animals died. They knew exactly what they were doing releasing this into the human population.
This is unbelievable. People forget the fact that several vaccines were discontinued in the past due to adverse effects and deaths. The adverse effects from these covid vaccines dwarfs those cases combined. Yet they pushed forward and silenced doctors. Your gov has changed folks. These people do not care about you. Do not Obey.
"The senior author of the paper has over 55 published papers and an h-index of 16, which means he’s highly respected."
Papers in medicine tend to have very high citation counts. An h-index of 16 means that he has published at least 16 papers that have been cited 16 times. In certain specialized fields of engineering or math, even a good paper in a good journal might get 25 citations in its lifetime. The average citation count in most medical fields is in the hundreds. H16 doesn't strike me as particularly high for his field, certainly not for "highly respected" status.
Firearm stats require a deeper dive because they are often including criminal gang members as "children" dying from firearm related deaths and they have also in the past included up to 21 years old as "children" and again many of these deaths or people involved in firearm deaths are criminal gang members and just plain criminals.
Thanks for continuing to expose this kind of data. People are paying attention and many parents are realizing the truth, despite the “public health agencies” propaganda.
Hey Steve, great job exposing this fraud, again and again.
Question for you: Any chance that the vaxxed cohort having more comorbidities is ALSO not by chance?! Maybe a meta study is in order to understand if this is being reported in a majority of Covid 19 studies over the last 3 yrs? More proof that kids who get vaxxed more often are simply more likely to react badly to MORE vaxxing, like covid19.
NHS data from early 2021 showed a lower infection rate (because it was early, before protection waned) but 8x higher death rate in the shot group. Scroll down to Figure 1:
“These data support the notion that pre-existing anti-S-IgG induced by the vaccine may be sub-neutralizing in a subset of individuals (hence becoming infected in spite of being vaccinated) and thus may accelerate infectivity via ADE and lead to higher death rates. Taken together with models presented by Ricke,12 these data further emphasize the importance of developing novel vaccines that are T-cell-based and not dependent only upon antibodies.”
No. Infection, not vaccines result in T-cell immunity. Had Covid been treated with disease modifying drugs and therapeutics, just imagine the difference in our world right now.
From 2005, known that chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread
What needs to be studied now that we are 4 years in on covid mRNA injections and many people are having babies, is what effects these injections will have on the future generation. Without having these specific injections themselves, will there be permanent genetic changes? Early cancers? Shortened lifespans? Disabilities? These children need to be followed for years, decades even.
Steve, here is the perfect example of a limited hang. I was surprised to see the BBC do an article on somebody who was injured until I read the article. In the article they claim deaths dropped dramatically after the shots came out - we know that's not true, nor is it true that injuries like this man's are exceedingly rare, or that the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks. The injuries can no longer he hidden or denied so they roll a story out on just one as a way of acknowledging the undeniable and use that to further false pro-jab talking points that will be readily embraced by the fearful and anxious who took the jabs and weren't immediately hurt.
Excellent, accurate, informative. Nobody explains statistical obfuscation better, or cuts to the chase quicker. Thanks, and please don't relent. Interview with NY firefighter also concise. Still can't post likes on this forum and note deletion of thread about that subject. Hope your eye is getting better.
Autopsy by a Pathologist is necessary.
What no-one will say out loud is this was a b!0 Weapon. What kept me from getting the jabs was a Dr. Cahill out of Ireland posted a video at the beginning, telling that they had worked with this material for 10 years and could never get it past animal trials. The reason was simple, after 2 years all the animals died. They knew exactly what they were doing releasing this into the human population.
This is unbelievable. People forget the fact that several vaccines were discontinued in the past due to adverse effects and deaths. The adverse effects from these covid vaccines dwarfs those cases combined. Yet they pushed forward and silenced doctors. Your gov has changed folks. These people do not care about you. Do not Obey.
"The senior author of the paper has over 55 published papers and an h-index of 16, which means he’s highly respected."
Papers in medicine tend to have very high citation counts. An h-index of 16 means that he has published at least 16 papers that have been cited 16 times. In certain specialized fields of engineering or math, even a good paper in a good journal might get 25 citations in its lifetime. The average citation count in most medical fields is in the hundreds. H16 doesn't strike me as particularly high for his field, certainly not for "highly respected" status.
5x higher all cause mortality, it’s right in line with the DTAP vaccine.
Firearm stats require a deeper dive because they are often including criminal gang members as "children" dying from firearm related deaths and they have also in the past included up to 21 years old as "children" and again many of these deaths or people involved in firearm deaths are criminal gang members and just plain criminals.
Thanks for continuing to expose this kind of data. People are paying attention and many parents are realizing the truth, despite the “public health agencies” propaganda.
Hey Steve, great job exposing this fraud, again and again.
Question for you: Any chance that the vaxxed cohort having more comorbidities is ALSO not by chance?! Maybe a meta study is in order to understand if this is being reported in a majority of Covid 19 studies over the last 3 yrs? More proof that kids who get vaxxed more often are simply more likely to react badly to MORE vaxxing, like covid19.
NHS data from early 2021 showed a lower infection rate (because it was early, before protection waned) but 8x higher death rate in the shot group. Scroll down to Figure 1:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459929/
Shot should have been stopped then.
“These data support the notion that pre-existing anti-S-IgG induced by the vaccine may be sub-neutralizing in a subset of individuals (hence becoming infected in spite of being vaccinated) and thus may accelerate infectivity via ADE and lead to higher death rates. Taken together with models presented by Ricke,12 these data further emphasize the importance of developing novel vaccines that are T-cell-based and not dependent only upon antibodies.”
No. Infection, not vaccines result in T-cell immunity. Had Covid been treated with disease modifying drugs and therapeutics, just imagine the difference in our world right now.
From 2005, known that chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/
Further to that study and quite a few like it, there was this one a few weeks back:
"SARS-CoV-2-specific plasma cells are not durably established in the bone marrow long-lived compartment after mRNA vaccination"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03278-y
What needs to be studied now that we are 4 years in on covid mRNA injections and many people are having babies, is what effects these injections will have on the future generation. Without having these specific injections themselves, will there be permanent genetic changes? Early cancers? Shortened lifespans? Disabilities? These children need to be followed for years, decades even.
In light of my comment, you may want to look at Walter M Chesnut's substack that I just got.
Title: Pli Selon Pli: The Slow, Inexorable Replacement of Our DNA with Spike Protein – and it Could Be Hereditary: https://wmcresearch.substack.com/p/pli-selon-pli-the-slow-inexorable
Steve... Thanks for your tireless effort in researching and posting this material. Hope health and eye situation is much improved.
Thank you. -
Steve, here is the perfect example of a limited hang. I was surprised to see the BBC do an article on somebody who was injured until I read the article. In the article they claim deaths dropped dramatically after the shots came out - we know that's not true, nor is it true that injuries like this man's are exceedingly rare, or that the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks. The injuries can no longer he hidden or denied so they roll a story out on just one as a way of acknowledging the undeniable and use that to further false pro-jab talking points that will be readily embraced by the fearful and anxious who took the jabs and weren't immediately hurt.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0kj1pmr7jdo
Thank you for being a bulldog Steve - we’re right here with you.
Thank you for this reporting and analysis.
Excellent, accurate, informative. Nobody explains statistical obfuscation better, or cuts to the chase quicker. Thanks, and please don't relent. Interview with NY firefighter also concise. Still can't post likes on this forum and note deletion of thread about that subject. Hope your eye is getting better.