Steve, here is the perfect example of a limited hang. I was surprised to see the BBC do an article on somebody who was injured until I read the article. In the article they claim deaths dropped dramatically after the shots came out - we know that's not true, nor is it true that injuries like this man's are exceedingly rare, or that the b…
Steve, here is the perfect example of a limited hang. I was surprised to see the BBC do an article on somebody who was injured until I read the article. In the article they claim deaths dropped dramatically after the shots came out - we know that's not true, nor is it true that injuries like this man's are exceedingly rare, or that the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks. The injuries can no longer he hidden or denied so they roll a story out on just one as a way of acknowledging the undeniable and use that to further false pro-jab talking points that will be readily embraced by the fearful and anxious who took the jabs and weren't immediately hurt.
Steve, here is the perfect example of a limited hang. I was surprised to see the BBC do an article on somebody who was injured until I read the article. In the article they claim deaths dropped dramatically after the shots came out - we know that's not true, nor is it true that injuries like this man's are exceedingly rare, or that the benefits of the shots outweigh the risks. The injuries can no longer he hidden or denied so they roll a story out on just one as a way of acknowledging the undeniable and use that to further false pro-jab talking points that will be readily embraced by the fearful and anxious who took the jabs and weren't immediately hurt.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0kj1pmr7jdo