look at the LAST page (28) in the section that starts in bold
"Assays for assessment of immunogenicity endpoints"
The beginning of second paragraph in this section reads
"Data demonstrating the ability of the modified COVID-19 vaccine to induce a
neutralizing antibody response are needed, as a scientific matter. "
What this means in non-orwellian English is that they have no information about whether or not the shot will be neutralizing ; meaning stop infection spread and transmission.
NO DATA.
THis story just broke where a pfizer exec admitted to the euro-parliament that they didnt study it.
Tucker Carlson coverd it on Tuesday .
But what these people are MISSING is this: The pfzier admission said that they didnt study it because they were in a RUSH. "we had to move at the speed of science' said this pfizer executive in her appearance before the euro union gov.
BUT Pfizier has been studying and making vaccines for decades. covid is a respiratory infection and in order to have a sterlilzing immune response your body has to make the specific IgA type of antibodies which are specific to the mucosal skin in the nose and throat and lungs. A shot WILL NOT DO THIS.
In fact there is a disease found in chickens called Mareks disease and other respiratory infections of food animals and various groups have tried to create effective vaccines for these aninal illnesses and they have all failed.
SO my point is that Pfizer had to have known, they must have known that this shot would probably not created mucosal secretory IgA immunity that would facilitate herd immunity. But in this line at the END of their EUA submission, they intentionally buried this fact at the end and dismissed it in an of the cuff comment... " as a scientific matter", like it was not urgent or important to know right now.
When in fact the ability of the jab to create sterilizing immunity was the KEY to everything. It was they justification for all the coercion.
I would assert that PFizer knew this and minimized it and made it appear non-urgent
Their statement comes across as professional and scientific when really its just cover for a massive fraud.
THey knew the shot would not stop infection but they sold it and pushed it anyway b/c they knew that the population would require endless boosters and other drugs like paxlovid.
According to top german scientists, Prof. Bhakdi, the antibody production happens in blood ONLY. Check in basic books: Antibodies are produced by B-lymphocytes after differentiation of B-lymphocytes into plasma cells.". Plasma is BLOOD!!!!
So where on earth will you find blood (and thus the antibodies) on mucus membranes, the first place of 'infection' by SArs-CoV-2?? Only if you get hit by the car!!!
When WHO/CDC/NIH/FDA came out and announced 'there IS NO INNATE IMMUNITY' the entire scientific medical community should have started to rebel and laugh it out!! WHat happened? Not only MD's accepted no more innate immunity, they signed of on new gene modification treatments as 'vaccines'!! IT's CRIMINAL, complete idiocy.
I heard Prof. Bhakdi say that, as well. I have two questions. I'm not a scientist but do have an understanding of some of this. My questions:
1) Since the antibodies are only in the blood, which makes sense to me, how can this shot be effective at all (I'm very aware of the other dangerous elements of the shot but I'm curious about this aspect)? I ask that because there are some scientists on our side who have said it's effective for so many weeks.
2) When the person's antibodies start attacking the cells that line the blood vessels because there are spike proteins in them from the shot, how does that weaken the person's body so they become sick with a variant or whatever else when the antibodies are in the blood? I'm not clear how it destroys the innate neutralizing antibodies that help one's body stop viruses. I'm missing something here. Please help me to understand. Thanks.
there are different types of anti bodies produced by different parts of the body under different circumstances and at different times during an infection
IgA is made by mucous membranes. A shot in the arm does not stimulate the body to make IgA. A natural covid infection would do this. THere are many different proteins ( antigens) on the natural virus and all of these proteins can be slightly different across a population of viral particles. just like in a herd of zebra the animals are all the same species but exhibit variation in their appearance and genetic makeup. The same is true from viruses. A natural infection will stimulate a reaction to the whole range of natural proteins in all their variation on the virus. The IGA will be made by the mucous membranes in the respiratory tracts and then later the IgM and IgG is produced , then later on memory T cells care made that hopefully will protect against or mitigate the severitly of future infections.
The mRNA shot makes the body produce and IgG antibody response to only one specific identical version of the spike protein from the original Alpha strain. After only a couple of months this strain changed and the vax receipients protection will be inadequte
this was understood in the Summer of 2020 when they announced how they would be developing the shot. The stated goal was to reduce the severity of the illness, which might be a laudable goal. But there was never any justification whatsoever to coerce people into taking the shot and it was obvious to people like me and many others that the shot would not stop infection and transmission because it did not stimulate the IgA in the repiratory tracts. Thus all the claims about herd immunity and the shot being a moral duty were complete lies and distortions and misunderstandings that the public health establishment and pfizer either didnt understand which makes them incompetent or they deliberately stoked this lie to sell product which makes them evil
Incompetent or evil one or the other or a combo of both.
Can you please provide references for all your claims??? For example:
"There are many different proteins ( antigens) on the natural virus and all of these proteins can be slightly different across a population of viral particles."
these are not "claims" these are basic immunological facts that one learns in an intro immunology / infectious disease class as an undergrad ( I studied biochem and I am a practicing physician)
Populations of living things are not all genetically the same. You and I and all humans are 99.9 percent genetically the same but it is the little differences that make us unique
Proteins made by liiving things can be slightly different. Insulin is a protein hormone made by the pancreas. Insulin made by a cow is chemically just a little different in its amino acid sequence than insulin from a pig or a human.
THe proteins on the coronavirus can vary depending on the strains. In a given sample from just one person of millions of viral particles , the individual viral particles can be slightly genetically different
There are 5 different basic types of immunoglobulins the IgA is the one that is made by the mucosa ( the lining of the respiratory tract) THe mRNA covid shot does not induce an IgA response. It induces an IgG response , which is in the blood only. It was hoped that this reponse in the blood would neutralize or sterilize the recipient and stop infection but it does NOT. At best the shot provides a limited and meager immune boost that reduces the severity of the illness. For those who are NOT at risk of severe illness, there is no reason to take the shot at all and since it does not create an IgA response there is NO chance that this shot could confer herd immunity. There is no chance that the shot could protect others, thus there was never any reason to mandate it.
Pfizer probably knew this and knew that people would need endless boosters.
Its like the difference between an upfront purchase versus a subscription plan.
You can take three childhood vaccines and never have to take them ever again OR you will need to take boosters every 6-12 months for years.
Pfizer adopted the subscription plan model and lied to everyone about the efficacy
and the "experts " in public health and major academic hospitals were literally to scared, stupid or corrupt or ideologically blind to see through this fraud
"Populations of living things are not all genetically the same." is very true, just the viruses are NOT living things. The presence of ONE SINGLE Pfizer/Mod-E-RNA injections types were the proof of it, there was only ONE SPIKE genome, until the first mutations occurred. ANd when you follow all the bioinformatics info on all the sequences, you might be very surprised to see the outcome (in my posts..)
Since I'm not immunologist, like Prof. Bhakdi is, I do believe what he says, but currently I'm learning more with every day, including your links here. So thanks! Just remember, before you send out some studies, check out who paid for the research...
So viruses are real and cause humam disease. There was never ONE Single spike proteins. The spike proteins from the alpha variant was the one that they decided to put into the mRNA shot. But even at that time they were other variance circulating. And even that specific alpha variant there were mine are variations in the sequence of the spike proteins. The makers of the mRNA vaccine just happen to pick one specific one
Ad 1. the shots produce foreign synthetic protein, which ankers in the membranes of cells which received that synthetic gene. The nanomaterials surrounding the mmRNA do not differentiate between the cell types which it affects, like normal natural infection does, in which for example only mucus membranes are affected. The Pfizer/Mod-E-RNA nanolipids theoretically can cross any phospholipid membrane, thus any cell can start producing the Spike, on it surface. That's already the idiocy No 1 of that 'new idea' for 'vaccines'. How is the Spike oriented in the membrane towards the 'outside' of the cell where it is supposed to meet the antibody producing cells? There is NO 3D STRUCTURE showing that. So just citing one more source (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546670/): "Antibodies are naturally produced by plasma cells within the human body to mediate an adaptive immune response against invading pathogens."
==>> the anti-Spike antibodies produced IN BLOOD can't protect anyone from getting the covid ON MUCUS MEMBRANES for example....The antibodies are not in the right place to be effective.
2, In the infection process the Spike binds to HUMAN ACE2 receptors via its RBD domain. IN order to prevent that binding the antibody MUST contain specific sequence which equally binds to exactly the same ACE2 binding surface(that's why the author whom I contacted regarding that sequence, said they don't have it...). And that's the catch, because ACE2 has COUNTLESS other NATURAL, extremely important binding partners, many related to blood, which now might have affinity for that anti-Spike antibody, sensing that ACE2 binding section of that antibody. There are many more huge issues with this entire 'solution', a lie sold by those who do not like ivermectin or HCQ, or simple VitC with Zn or H2O2. The fact, that we are actually dealing with genes expressing all this, is an entire new dimension, just beyond me.
It has never been effective at all against infection or transmission; that's well established. There's some small question of whether it prevented "severe disease" as claimed; but if so, for a short while only. The "severe disease" part is when it does get into the blood, causing hypoxic injury and eventually cytokine storm. So, it is possible that antibodies in the blood did something once, but a better explanation is that the statistics which make it look this way have been adjusted through classification protocols.
For example, the original definition of a breakthrough case was lowered to PCR threshold of 28 cycles. Meanwhile, the "unvaccinated" continued to be reported at the current standards of 35-45. This is how the illusion of efficacy was achieved, by selectively filtering false positives only for the jabbed.
This document, which I have screenshots of but has since disappeared, directed all centers on this protocol. So, naturally, many false positives disappeared, but only for the "vaccinated". This made the infection rate artificially lower.
Additionally, you weren't "fully vaccinated" until two weeks after the second shot, so any cases up to that point were counted as "unvaccinated" early on in many places.
Similarly, "unknown" status is generally recorded as "unvaccinated".
So, while well-meaning doctors, scientists and others still take these early efficacy claims seriously, it's questionable whether it works at all.
Don't get me started on the trial data and how jacked it is.
Please read:"Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Human Antibodies against the 2019 Novel Coronavirus SARS CoV2 and Its Variants as a Result of Vaccination and Infection "
with quote from abstract:
"monitoring the IgG-based serological response to vaccination throughout the vaccination sequence and also resolved acute (within hours) increases in antibody levels."
Strangely the author stated in an email to me, quote:
"We purchase antigens to use in our diagnostic chips, but the antibodies we measure are naturally occurring in our human patient samples.
So, we do not have any sequence information for the antibodies."
I asked for the sequence of these antibodies... Not available...
the matter get's even more 'confused'. It appears, that every single person produces different antibody to one and the same virus.. Then I must ask, so how on earth the antibodies tests work?? We clearly don't have as many tests as 'infectious humans'!
Lot of the experts were saying anti-body test is even less specific than PCR test, and that while we know PCR is fraud...
I can’t wait! I have been downright evangelical abt this book. The prolly alone made me NUTS! I have probably singlehandedly sold 100 copies! 😂 It is LIFE CHANGING. I went from seeing Tony “the science” Fauci as a voice of reason in a time of panic to the wolf in elves, I mean sheep’s clothing he has been for decades.
That's fantastic that you helped spread the word. Luckily, I've never trusted anyone in those positions. Something just didn't seem right early on. Plus, I've done a lot of research on holistic health and actual science for 10+ years which caused me to be suspicious very early on about all of this insanity.
Of course he should have known. If he didnt know that makes him incompetent . If he knew and kept saying people who got the shot were a dead end for the virus then that makes him an evil sociopathic murderer.
You have a point! I wonder if the courts will agree. Let us pray that a giant snowball of lawsuits begins to roll and carry the perps into the hell they deserve.
Here is evidence of PFizer fraud: Here is the original PFizer document that was submitted to the FDA for that EUA approval for the mRNA jab.
https://www.fda.gov/media/142749/download
look at the LAST page (28) in the section that starts in bold
"Assays for assessment of immunogenicity endpoints"
The beginning of second paragraph in this section reads
"Data demonstrating the ability of the modified COVID-19 vaccine to induce a
neutralizing antibody response are needed, as a scientific matter. "
What this means in non-orwellian English is that they have no information about whether or not the shot will be neutralizing ; meaning stop infection spread and transmission.
NO DATA.
THis story just broke where a pfizer exec admitted to the euro-parliament that they didnt study it.
Tucker Carlson coverd it on Tuesday .
But what these people are MISSING is this: The pfzier admission said that they didnt study it because they were in a RUSH. "we had to move at the speed of science' said this pfizer executive in her appearance before the euro union gov.
BUT Pfizier has been studying and making vaccines for decades. covid is a respiratory infection and in order to have a sterlilzing immune response your body has to make the specific IgA type of antibodies which are specific to the mucosal skin in the nose and throat and lungs. A shot WILL NOT DO THIS.
In fact there is a disease found in chickens called Mareks disease and other respiratory infections of food animals and various groups have tried to create effective vaccines for these aninal illnesses and they have all failed.
SO my point is that Pfizer had to have known, they must have known that this shot would probably not created mucosal secretory IgA immunity that would facilitate herd immunity. But in this line at the END of their EUA submission, they intentionally buried this fact at the end and dismissed it in an of the cuff comment... " as a scientific matter", like it was not urgent or important to know right now.
When in fact the ability of the jab to create sterilizing immunity was the KEY to everything. It was they justification for all the coercion.
I would assert that PFizer knew this and minimized it and made it appear non-urgent
Their statement comes across as professional and scientific when really its just cover for a massive fraud.
THey knew the shot would not stop infection but they sold it and pushed it anyway b/c they knew that the population would require endless boosters and other drugs like paxlovid.
ITs the greatest fraud in human history
According to top german scientists, Prof. Bhakdi, the antibody production happens in blood ONLY. Check in basic books: Antibodies are produced by B-lymphocytes after differentiation of B-lymphocytes into plasma cells.". Plasma is BLOOD!!!!
So where on earth will you find blood (and thus the antibodies) on mucus membranes, the first place of 'infection' by SArs-CoV-2?? Only if you get hit by the car!!!
When WHO/CDC/NIH/FDA came out and announced 'there IS NO INNATE IMMUNITY' the entire scientific medical community should have started to rebel and laugh it out!! WHat happened? Not only MD's accepted no more innate immunity, they signed of on new gene modification treatments as 'vaccines'!! IT's CRIMINAL, complete idiocy.
I heard Prof. Bhakdi say that, as well. I have two questions. I'm not a scientist but do have an understanding of some of this. My questions:
1) Since the antibodies are only in the blood, which makes sense to me, how can this shot be effective at all (I'm very aware of the other dangerous elements of the shot but I'm curious about this aspect)? I ask that because there are some scientists on our side who have said it's effective for so many weeks.
2) When the person's antibodies start attacking the cells that line the blood vessels because there are spike proteins in them from the shot, how does that weaken the person's body so they become sick with a variant or whatever else when the antibodies are in the blood? I'm not clear how it destroys the innate neutralizing antibodies that help one's body stop viruses. I'm missing something here. Please help me to understand. Thanks.
there are different types of anti bodies produced by different parts of the body under different circumstances and at different times during an infection
IgA is made by mucous membranes. A shot in the arm does not stimulate the body to make IgA. A natural covid infection would do this. THere are many different proteins ( antigens) on the natural virus and all of these proteins can be slightly different across a population of viral particles. just like in a herd of zebra the animals are all the same species but exhibit variation in their appearance and genetic makeup. The same is true from viruses. A natural infection will stimulate a reaction to the whole range of natural proteins in all their variation on the virus. The IGA will be made by the mucous membranes in the respiratory tracts and then later the IgM and IgG is produced , then later on memory T cells care made that hopefully will protect against or mitigate the severitly of future infections.
The mRNA shot makes the body produce and IgG antibody response to only one specific identical version of the spike protein from the original Alpha strain. After only a couple of months this strain changed and the vax receipients protection will be inadequte
this was understood in the Summer of 2020 when they announced how they would be developing the shot. The stated goal was to reduce the severity of the illness, which might be a laudable goal. But there was never any justification whatsoever to coerce people into taking the shot and it was obvious to people like me and many others that the shot would not stop infection and transmission because it did not stimulate the IgA in the repiratory tracts. Thus all the claims about herd immunity and the shot being a moral duty were complete lies and distortions and misunderstandings that the public health establishment and pfizer either didnt understand which makes them incompetent or they deliberately stoked this lie to sell product which makes them evil
Incompetent or evil one or the other or a combo of both.
Can you please provide references for all your claims??? For example:
"There are many different proteins ( antigens) on the natural virus and all of these proteins can be slightly different across a population of viral particles."
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3693128/
these are not "claims" these are basic immunological facts that one learns in an intro immunology / infectious disease class as an undergrad ( I studied biochem and I am a practicing physician)
Populations of living things are not all genetically the same. You and I and all humans are 99.9 percent genetically the same but it is the little differences that make us unique
Proteins made by liiving things can be slightly different. Insulin is a protein hormone made by the pancreas. Insulin made by a cow is chemically just a little different in its amino acid sequence than insulin from a pig or a human.
THe proteins on the coronavirus can vary depending on the strains. In a given sample from just one person of millions of viral particles , the individual viral particles can be slightly genetically different
There are 5 different basic types of immunoglobulins the IgA is the one that is made by the mucosa ( the lining of the respiratory tract) THe mRNA covid shot does not induce an IgA response. It induces an IgG response , which is in the blood only. It was hoped that this reponse in the blood would neutralize or sterilize the recipient and stop infection but it does NOT. At best the shot provides a limited and meager immune boost that reduces the severity of the illness. For those who are NOT at risk of severe illness, there is no reason to take the shot at all and since it does not create an IgA response there is NO chance that this shot could confer herd immunity. There is no chance that the shot could protect others, thus there was never any reason to mandate it.
Pfizer probably knew this and knew that people would need endless boosters.
Its like the difference between an upfront purchase versus a subscription plan.
You can take three childhood vaccines and never have to take them ever again OR you will need to take boosters every 6-12 months for years.
Pfizer adopted the subscription plan model and lied to everyone about the efficacy
and the "experts " in public health and major academic hospitals were literally to scared, stupid or corrupt or ideologically blind to see through this fraud
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546670/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK27144/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK26884/
and this about isotypes
https://absoluteantibody.com/antibody-resources/antibody-overview/antibody-isotypes-subtypes/
"Populations of living things are not all genetically the same." is very true, just the viruses are NOT living things. The presence of ONE SINGLE Pfizer/Mod-E-RNA injections types were the proof of it, there was only ONE SPIKE genome, until the first mutations occurred. ANd when you follow all the bioinformatics info on all the sequences, you might be very surprised to see the outcome (in my posts..)
Since I'm not immunologist, like Prof. Bhakdi is, I do believe what he says, but currently I'm learning more with every day, including your links here. So thanks! Just remember, before you send out some studies, check out who paid for the research...
So viruses are real and cause humam disease. There was never ONE Single spike proteins. The spike proteins from the alpha variant was the one that they decided to put into the mRNA shot. But even at that time they were other variance circulating. And even that specific alpha variant there were mine are variations in the sequence of the spike proteins. The makers of the mRNA vaccine just happen to pick one specific one
Ad 1. the shots produce foreign synthetic protein, which ankers in the membranes of cells which received that synthetic gene. The nanomaterials surrounding the mmRNA do not differentiate between the cell types which it affects, like normal natural infection does, in which for example only mucus membranes are affected. The Pfizer/Mod-E-RNA nanolipids theoretically can cross any phospholipid membrane, thus any cell can start producing the Spike, on it surface. That's already the idiocy No 1 of that 'new idea' for 'vaccines'. How is the Spike oriented in the membrane towards the 'outside' of the cell where it is supposed to meet the antibody producing cells? There is NO 3D STRUCTURE showing that. So just citing one more source (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546670/): "Antibodies are naturally produced by plasma cells within the human body to mediate an adaptive immune response against invading pathogens."
==>> the anti-Spike antibodies produced IN BLOOD can't protect anyone from getting the covid ON MUCUS MEMBRANES for example....The antibodies are not in the right place to be effective.
2, In the infection process the Spike binds to HUMAN ACE2 receptors via its RBD domain. IN order to prevent that binding the antibody MUST contain specific sequence which equally binds to exactly the same ACE2 binding surface(that's why the author whom I contacted regarding that sequence, said they don't have it...). And that's the catch, because ACE2 has COUNTLESS other NATURAL, extremely important binding partners, many related to blood, which now might have affinity for that anti-Spike antibody, sensing that ACE2 binding section of that antibody. There are many more huge issues with this entire 'solution', a lie sold by those who do not like ivermectin or HCQ, or simple VitC with Zn or H2O2. The fact, that we are actually dealing with genes expressing all this, is an entire new dimension, just beyond me.
It has never been effective at all against infection or transmission; that's well established. There's some small question of whether it prevented "severe disease" as claimed; but if so, for a short while only. The "severe disease" part is when it does get into the blood, causing hypoxic injury and eventually cytokine storm. So, it is possible that antibodies in the blood did something once, but a better explanation is that the statistics which make it look this way have been adjusted through classification protocols.
For example, the original definition of a breakthrough case was lowered to PCR threshold of 28 cycles. Meanwhile, the "unvaccinated" continued to be reported at the current standards of 35-45. This is how the illusion of efficacy was achieved, by selectively filtering false positives only for the jabbed.
This document, which I have screenshots of but has since disappeared, directed all centers on this protocol. So, naturally, many false positives disappeared, but only for the "vaccinated". This made the infection rate artificially lower.
Additionally, you weren't "fully vaccinated" until two weeks after the second shot, so any cases up to that point were counted as "unvaccinated" early on in many places.
Similarly, "unknown" status is generally recorded as "unvaccinated".
So, while well-meaning doctors, scientists and others still take these early efficacy claims seriously, it's questionable whether it works at all.
Don't get me started on the trial data and how jacked it is.
Secretory IgA. (sIgA)
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK551516/
There is a specific type of anti body moiety called “IgA” which is produced by the mucous membranes of the respiratory tract.
Please read:"Rapid and Quantitative Detection of Human Antibodies against the 2019 Novel Coronavirus SARS CoV2 and Its Variants as a Result of Vaccination and Infection "
with quote from abstract:
"monitoring the IgG-based serological response to vaccination throughout the vaccination sequence and also resolved acute (within hours) increases in antibody levels."
Strangely the author stated in an email to me, quote:
"We purchase antigens to use in our diagnostic chips, but the antibodies we measure are naturally occurring in our human patient samples.
So, we do not have any sequence information for the antibodies."
I asked for the sequence of these antibodies... Not available...
The problem w measuring IgG is that levels of IGG does not always correspond to how
Much protection you have. Its just a market of past infection
Protection comes from mucosal IGa
the matter get's even more 'confused'. It appears, that every single person produces different antibody to one and the same virus.. Then I must ask, so how on earth the antibodies tests work?? We clearly don't have as many tests as 'infectious humans'!
Lot of the experts were saying anti-body test is even less specific than PCR test, and that while we know PCR is fraud...
It's mucosal lymphocytes, T cells, that you need.
Should Dr Fauci have known this? I say yes.
Read THE REAL ANTHONY FAUCI by RFK, jr.
OH MY WORD— the things that man knew/knows/DID. Somebody buy him some asbestos underpants. It’s hot where he’s going.
They have put together a documentary of the book. It's going to be shown for free on Oct. 18th. https://childrenshealthdefense.salsalabs.org/traf-movie-appeal?wvpId=8e1e8d18-1638-11e7-811d-12e7222c7e03
I can’t wait! I have been downright evangelical abt this book. The prolly alone made me NUTS! I have probably singlehandedly sold 100 copies! 😂 It is LIFE CHANGING. I went from seeing Tony “the science” Fauci as a voice of reason in a time of panic to the wolf in elves, I mean sheep’s clothing he has been for decades.
That's fantastic that you helped spread the word. Luckily, I've never trusted anyone in those positions. Something just didn't seem right early on. Plus, I've done a lot of research on holistic health and actual science for 10+ years which caused me to be suspicious very early on about all of this insanity.
Of course he should have known. If he didnt know that makes him incompetent . If he knew and kept saying people who got the shot were a dead end for the virus then that makes him an evil sociopathic murderer.
You have a point! I wonder if the courts will agree. Let us pray that a giant snowball of lawsuits begins to roll and carry the perps into the hell they deserve.