In the early days of the Pfizer shot distribution the fact that they needed heavy refrigeration units to keep them viable was widely publicized. My question is which locations got the refrigeration equipment and which didn't ? The unrefrigerated or under refrigerated shots could be deactivated and less harmful than the properly refrigera…
In the early days of the Pfizer shot distribution the fact that they needed heavy refrigeration units to keep them viable was widely publicized. My question is which locations got the refrigeration equipment and which didn't ? The unrefrigerated or under refrigerated shots could be deactivated and less harmful than the properly refrigerated shots. It could be a sneaky way to knock off populations that were unliked by those in control of the distribution of equipment. Or it could be that a Republican administration believing in the shot favored Republican states with better equipment. Or it could be that all locations got good refrigeration equipment. Or maybe few or none did. Finding this information could prove to be useful.
In the early days of the Pfizer shot distribution the fact that they needed heavy refrigeration units to keep them viable was widely publicized. My question is which locations got the refrigeration equipment and which didn't ? The unrefrigerated or under refrigerated shots could be deactivated and less harmful than the properly refrigerated shots. It could be a sneaky way to knock off populations that were unliked by those in control of the distribution of equipment. Or it could be that a Republican administration believing in the shot favored Republican states with better equipment. Or it could be that all locations got good refrigeration equipment. Or maybe few or none did. Finding this information could prove to be useful.