"We use their numbers (that are in public view) and their own algorithm (also in public view) and show that it should have triggered a safety signal for “death.” There is no way they can argue their way out of this one. There is no rock that is large enough for them to hide under. "
"and show that it should have triggered a safety signal …
"We use their numbers (that are in public view) and their own algorithm (also in public view) and show that it should have triggered a safety signal for “death.” There is no way they can argue their way out of this one. There is no rock that is large enough for them to hide under. "
"and show that it should have triggered a safety signal for “death.” "
It "should have" been signaled but it was not signaled so there is no proof of a signal of something, for instance death, that would have taken place officially at some point in time. That is when CRIME has taken place and that is when the CDC, that is, the government, can be sued for I guess, violating the First Amendment. The CDC has DELIBERATELY ignored a data point (if it was officially signaled) that works against the CDC's agenda or official narrative of the day.
Misinformation and disinformation is NOT a crime against the First Amendment, but the one exception where the CRIME of censorship (or "suppression") is legally allowed is when the government (CDC.gov) suppression of such speech (speech about data) causes harm to people. Ignoring IS censorship of the ignoring kind. Censorship about death numbers of people causes harm to people.
If lawsuit against the Federal government cannot be pursued for some reason, maybe there is another way to get this crime prosecuted since the defendant is the government.
You're forgetting how difficult it would to explain Steve's discovery to the public, much less a judge. By the way, I'm not sure there's criminal liability here, but the facts presented, if proven, would support a civil liability claim of enormous proportions.
"We use their numbers (that are in public view) and their own algorithm (also in public view) and show that it should have triggered a safety signal for “death.” There is no way they can argue their way out of this one. There is no rock that is large enough for them to hide under. "
"and show that it should have triggered a safety signal for “death.” "
It "should have" been signaled but it was not signaled so there is no proof of a signal of something, for instance death, that would have taken place officially at some point in time. That is when CRIME has taken place and that is when the CDC, that is, the government, can be sued for I guess, violating the First Amendment. The CDC has DELIBERATELY ignored a data point (if it was officially signaled) that works against the CDC's agenda or official narrative of the day.
Misinformation and disinformation is NOT a crime against the First Amendment, but the one exception where the CRIME of censorship (or "suppression") is legally allowed is when the government (CDC.gov) suppression of such speech (speech about data) causes harm to people. Ignoring IS censorship of the ignoring kind. Censorship about death numbers of people causes harm to people.
If lawsuit against the Federal government cannot be pursued for some reason, maybe there is another way to get this crime prosecuted since the defendant is the government.
I want people and CRIME PROSECUTED NOW.
Same goes for pharmaceutical company criminals.
You're forgetting how difficult it would to explain Steve's discovery to the public, much less a judge. By the way, I'm not sure there's criminal liability here, but the facts presented, if proven, would support a civil liability claim of enormous proportions.