Steve - official toxin exposure guidelines only apply to those with no gene mutations. If they were updated to give exposure guidelines to people with common gene mutations as well it would trigger a chain of events that would expose the harm caused by the pharmaceutical industry
It would mean our health authorities would have to recognis…
Steve - official toxin exposure guidelines only apply to those with no gene mutations. If they were updated to give exposure guidelines to people with common gene mutations as well it would trigger a chain of events that would expose the harm caused by the pharmaceutical industry
It would mean our health authorities would have to recognise that people with gene mutations that mean they are inefficient at detoxing have adverse events to toxins and antigens at much lower exposure levels. We are more antigen sensitive than those with no gene mutations.
The authorities would also have to stop vaccinating those with these common gene mutations as the amount of aluminium adjuvant is above their tolerance level.
If only people with no gene mutations were allowed to be vaccinated it would end autism and other vaccine adverse events
Those with no gene mutations can tolerate the aluminium and they don’t need hospital care for disease before retirement age
It’s those who have gene mutations that are the bread and butter of the pharmaceutical industry. Their products promote disease in us but not in people with no gene mutations as official toxin exposure levels are correct for them.
If official toxin exposure guidelines were worked out for those with gene mutations it would expose everything and hospital demand for common diseases would plummet
With where medical research has advanced to we should not have so many people requiring hospital care for disease but we do. And it’s all because civilisation has been created for people with no gene mutations. The world is simply too toxic for people with gene mutations which mean they are inefficient at detoxing and that’s why we have so much disease in people aged prior to retirement age. They all have these gene mutations
The pharmaceutical industry is aware of this and has spent considerable efforts to ensure that official toxin guidelines are never updated for people with common gene mutations. If it happened it would financially ruin them. It would also provide evidence for the harm caused to indigenous populations from colonisation which means it’s also in the western govts interests to keep this anomaly hushed up.
In NZ our health system doesn’t even provide toxicologists for patients to see. None at all. I suspect it’s because the testing that toxicologists do produces direct evidence of the harm caused to Māori from colonisation. Because the British signed a treaty with them it would be a litigious nightmare
Updating toxin exposure guidelines as I’ve suggested above would blow the whole scam open and bankrupt the pharmaceutical industry
Steve - official toxin exposure guidelines only apply to those with no gene mutations. If they were updated to give exposure guidelines to people with common gene mutations as well it would trigger a chain of events that would expose the harm caused by the pharmaceutical industry
It would mean our health authorities would have to recognise that people with gene mutations that mean they are inefficient at detoxing have adverse events to toxins and antigens at much lower exposure levels. We are more antigen sensitive than those with no gene mutations.
The authorities would also have to stop vaccinating those with these common gene mutations as the amount of aluminium adjuvant is above their tolerance level.
If only people with no gene mutations were allowed to be vaccinated it would end autism and other vaccine adverse events
Those with no gene mutations can tolerate the aluminium and they don’t need hospital care for disease before retirement age
It’s those who have gene mutations that are the bread and butter of the pharmaceutical industry. Their products promote disease in us but not in people with no gene mutations as official toxin exposure levels are correct for them.
If official toxin exposure guidelines were worked out for those with gene mutations it would expose everything and hospital demand for common diseases would plummet
With where medical research has advanced to we should not have so many people requiring hospital care for disease but we do. And it’s all because civilisation has been created for people with no gene mutations. The world is simply too toxic for people with gene mutations which mean they are inefficient at detoxing and that’s why we have so much disease in people aged prior to retirement age. They all have these gene mutations
The pharmaceutical industry is aware of this and has spent considerable efforts to ensure that official toxin guidelines are never updated for people with common gene mutations. If it happened it would financially ruin them. It would also provide evidence for the harm caused to indigenous populations from colonisation which means it’s also in the western govts interests to keep this anomaly hushed up.
In NZ our health system doesn’t even provide toxicologists for patients to see. None at all. I suspect it’s because the testing that toxicologists do produces direct evidence of the harm caused to Māori from colonisation. Because the British signed a treaty with them it would be a litigious nightmare
Updating toxin exposure guidelines as I’ve suggested above would blow the whole scam open and bankrupt the pharmaceutical industry