I wrote him off when the pfizer docs came out and people were raising questions on the tests, or lack thereof and the side effects/deaths in the test. I did watch him again about 6 months later and saw he changed his tune. I then watched his older vids until that point to see him change his view on it. I think he is genuine to be honest,…
I wrote him off when the pfizer docs came out and people were raising questions on the tests, or lack thereof and the side effects/deaths in the test. I did watch him again about 6 months later and saw he changed his tune. I then watched his older vids until that point to see him change his view on it. I think he is genuine to be honest, he just viewed the official data and reported on it. He's been smeared multiple times by the media for misinformation, despite them championing him when he was in favour of it.
I get where you're coming from though regarding censorship, but youtube also auto deletes replies with certain words in as well, no matter the channel.
I still think he's genuine though, seems like he actually cares and he is an outcast 'conspiracy theorist' or whatever in mass media as well for daring to ask uncomfortable questions.
To: Clotshot, CorScorpionis, unhappytocomply, Deanna Kline, Baldmichael, etc...
A friend of mine, who is against the mRNA-shots, recommended Dr. Campbell to me (after the point in time Dr. Campbell was no longer recommending Jabs), and told me about how much he was speaking about real-life cases of PoisonPoke-harm. I challenged him about this, as by this time YouTube was
de-platforming anyone who was openly critical of them. But my friend answered me with his keen observation: that Dr. C. has been able to avoid suspension because he is very careful to report only verifiable facts, and when he mentions ClotShot-injuries, he merely interviews patients about their symptoms.
To demonstrate how someone else had outsmarted censorship, my friend sent me a link to someone else's YouTube video who also managed to avoid suspension. This latter YouTuber was able to direct people to where they could find information and other truthtellers by literally writing out with a Sharpie® onto Post-It Notes® the URLs and/or names of sites or people who were exposing the lies about the Jabs, and holding these Notes up them up to the camera for the audience to write down. That way, the keyword-searching censorship bots would not automatically detect names and URLs they've been programmed to search for (that contain "misinformation") in order to take down the channel.
My friend was convinced Dr. C was similarly able to stay on YouTube by boldly pushing his points but deftly stopping just short of the line the would trigger his suspension.
I haven't independently researched all these assertions, but it is definitely something to think about.
I wrote him off when the pfizer docs came out and people were raising questions on the tests, or lack thereof and the side effects/deaths in the test. I did watch him again about 6 months later and saw he changed his tune. I then watched his older vids until that point to see him change his view on it. I think he is genuine to be honest, he just viewed the official data and reported on it. He's been smeared multiple times by the media for misinformation, despite them championing him when he was in favour of it.
I get where you're coming from though regarding censorship, but youtube also auto deletes replies with certain words in as well, no matter the channel.
I still think he's genuine though, seems like he actually cares and he is an outcast 'conspiracy theorist' or whatever in mass media as well for daring to ask uncomfortable questions.
To: Clotshot, CorScorpionis, unhappytocomply, Deanna Kline, Baldmichael, etc...
A friend of mine, who is against the mRNA-shots, recommended Dr. Campbell to me (after the point in time Dr. Campbell was no longer recommending Jabs), and told me about how much he was speaking about real-life cases of PoisonPoke-harm. I challenged him about this, as by this time YouTube was
de-platforming anyone who was openly critical of them. But my friend answered me with his keen observation: that Dr. C. has been able to avoid suspension because he is very careful to report only verifiable facts, and when he mentions ClotShot-injuries, he merely interviews patients about their symptoms.
To demonstrate how someone else had outsmarted censorship, my friend sent me a link to someone else's YouTube video who also managed to avoid suspension. This latter YouTuber was able to direct people to where they could find information and other truthtellers by literally writing out with a Sharpie® onto Post-It Notes® the URLs and/or names of sites or people who were exposing the lies about the Jabs, and holding these Notes up them up to the camera for the audience to write down. That way, the keyword-searching censorship bots would not automatically detect names and URLs they've been programmed to search for (that contain "misinformation") in order to take down the channel.
My friend was convinced Dr. C was similarly able to stay on YouTube by boldly pushing his points but deftly stopping just short of the line the would trigger his suspension.
I haven't independently researched all these assertions, but it is definitely something to think about.