Ray Horvath, "The Source" :) on Steve Kirsch's newsletter

[Ray Horvath, "The Source" :)]

I beg to disagree. The Kennedy clan was only an example, but they were far from all good. Yes, a lot better than today's creeps. However, no politician will ever save the country:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/hijacked-governments

The land was stolen as early as 1913 (the Federal Reserve Act and creating the IRS), but probably in 1882, when the Federal Government became a corporation:

https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/in-case-you-are-in-doubt

Sorry, this is technocratic globalists using eugenusistic methods to cull the herd... I believe both "Marxist" and "Fascists" are only cuss words that prevent any further discussion...

[unhappytocomply]

Incorporated in 1871 (not 1882) with the "help" of international bankers.

[Blaise]

Yes, of course the Kennedys had a LOT of corrupt-ness, starting with their daddy, and particularly as evidenced by corrupt Teddy. I also agree that no politician can, ipso facto, "save" the country; only a spiritual revival. I also agree that the land was outright stolen. Similarly the eugenicists movement. I have a 2,000 page, 10,000 footnote paper on the Covid shot (yes, really).

But the term fasco-Marxist, while one can take it anyway they want, is a descriptive term that clears, not obfuscates, what is going on, and what lies underneath their worldview. If people take that as a slur to prevent further discussion, all I can say is "if the shoe, fits, wear it." Mussolini's eponymous 1932 The Doctrine of Fascism, https://sjsu.edu/faculty/wooda/2B-HUM/Readings/The-Doctrine-of-Fascism.pdf makes it very clear. And if we don't use precise terms, all to spare the wokesters poor egos, then I guess we will need to revert to using sign language, to barking like dogs. Fact is, fasco-Marxist is not a cuss word; rather it is **descriptive** and elucidates what is going on. And that's a fact; it also helps develop discussion by defining terms https://blaisevanne.substack.com/p/introducing-fasco-marxism .

I will continue to use, and advocate the use of the term fasco-Marxism, as a means to elucidate what is going on, and **to clear the air** of the linguistic miasmi these people thrive on, where we won't know what hit us until it is too late.

And a Trump/Kennedy ticket? Fraught with a thousand problems. But rather than waiting for the perfect candidate, or trying to retreat to my bunker, where the drones will only eventually find me anyway, is worth a shot. The alternative is living as slaves on the Soros/Gates plantation. Rather, like William Wilberforce showed us, one can take partial victories, all the while pressing on and not letting up, to final victory.

[Kenneth N Shonk]

There is an old Zen Buddhist saying, "Opposites become each other". I agree with your view that Fascism and Communism are two sides of the same "coin" of tyranny (fasco-marxism). They both employ the same tactics from censorship to character assassination of opponents to engineered famines, to shipping the "undesirables (Jews, Tibetans, Uyghurs, etc) " or political opponents off to the Gulag or "isolation / internment / reeducation camps" that are in fact extermination camps (a la Gov. of NY Kathy Hochu - as witness the NY governors appeal to the ruling striking down proposed public health departmant rules on detainment and isolation camps as unconstitutional).l

[Blaise]

Thanks. Fascism (e.g., National SOCIALIST German Workers' Party) and Communism (eg. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) are both socialist. The diff is that fascism uses big biz as the arm of the socialist state, whereas in communism the state owns the means of production directly. Also, fascism is nationalist (blood and soil) whereas communists are internationalists. All one has to do is read Mussolini's 1932 definitive The Doctrine of Fascism https://sjsu.edu/faculty/wooda/2B-HUM/Readings/The-Doctrine-of-Fascism.pdf and/or look up the party planks the Nazis adopted at their first convention, Munich, FEb. 1920

Then why did HItler invade the USSR is always the question. The answer is above about nationalism. And also these people need to answer why Brezhnev had the Ussuri River War with Mao late 60s/early 70s, which Brezhnev went to Nixon and asked if he nuked Mao, would the US get involved. Nixon said yes, so it never happened. As it was, hundreds were killed. Then after our Vietnam involvment, there were TWO times in the late 70s/early 80s that Communist China invaded Uncle Ho's Communist Vietnam. People answer me why that happened, and I will then answer the HItler/USSR Operation Barbarossa question