My comment is insanely off the topic, but "court of law" triggers me. I finally read "Uncle Tom's Cabin" a few years ago. I found the book was slow but the forward by Harriet Beecher Stowe was electrifying. She said she wrote the book out of outrage for the fugitive slave act, that allowed bounty hunters to track down slaves in free stat…
My comment is insanely off the topic, but "court of law" triggers me. I finally read "Uncle Tom's Cabin" a few years ago. I found the book was slow but the forward by Harriet Beecher Stowe was electrifying. She said she wrote the book out of outrage for the fugitive slave act, that allowed bounty hunters to track down slaves in free states and return them to slavery. Anybody giving the escaped slave help could be jailed. This was the direct result of the infamous supreme court Dred Scott Decision. A slave was brought into the State of Wisconsin that banned slavery. The Supreme Court threw out the 10th amendment and decided that a federal court could overrule a state. They could allow slavery to continue in the state of Wisconsin. They decided that federal courts were supreme over state law even where the 10th amendment forbade it.
No federal judge has ever understood that the 10th amendment is a limit on federal judges. Every damn last one of them should impeached and if found guilt of impeachment, be charged with treason and if found guilty, be hanged.
No state is bound by federal bureaucracy rules. They may be bound by federal law that is allowed by the constitution. The corollary to this, is any state agency is responsible for for rules they enforce. It does not matter what the CDC/NIH says. The stage agency has to be held responsible for rules they enforce. Must be legal. Must show due diligence. Referring to federal agencies is irreverent. They must audit the federal agency for accuracy and if the federal agency balks, they must ignore the agency as irrelevant.
It will never end it we don't start hanging some federal judges for treason.
So not so insanely off topic. Enforcing CDC rules by state officials is unlawful.
Yeah, every time I hear someone quoting a SCOTUS ruling, I want to vomit. They have been tools forever. It just figures, that lawyers would devise a system of "checks and balances" almost all of which were written by, and favorable to, lawyers. Friggin lawyers.
The Declaration of Independence, as perfect a document as a government could need/heed, got into the hands of lawyers, and look what they did. Butchered the spirit of the declaration with a cold steel blade before we even got started.
'We the People" GAVE them something, and right away they started chipping away at it, all the while gouging us for the privilege of being robbed.
Ex doc but not an attorney. It's my understanding that states have way more power under the law than most people accept. Agencies like the CDC, FDA and NIH have ZERO authority do anything but issue guidelines. Guidelines are not law. None of the states voted on CDC policy they enforced them without putting the policy though the legislator, so all CDC policies are null and void. This is what my attorney tells me.
Indeed states have power, but a CEO can impose a mandate illegally (it is violation of the EUA terms to coerce compliance with an experimental intervention by leveraging jobs and providing NO informed consent) because he is afraid of insurance denials if CDC rules are not followed. Since a corrupt DOJ will never investigate and litigation is too expensive for most, the company gets its way. EFFECTIVELY the HHS agencies hold dictatorial power in a corrupt system.
I appreciate and like your comment but disagree in the basic premise or implication you make that Biden and handlers can’t find a way around that. Remember, there’s an obvious plan here for control and our OWN US dept of HHS is the one who wrote the amendments that would cede authority (or most of the amendments if not all). Can you tell me why they would do that? I can only guess. Anyone know if they have our loud or in writing actually stated their intent? Real question here.... anyone?
It's up to us individually and as a group if we allow it. A person with nothing to lose can be dangerous. Choose if you would rather due as a slave or as a free person. Unfortunately too many will choose slavery and are willing to die for it.
LauraJ just wrote the above comment and substack piblished it as though it was from props,children. Unless my phone or the server isn’t working and maybe it will autocorrect, I did NOT highjack props.children account.
Yes, and sheriffs also have tremendous power and discretion, but many of them (and most of the population) don't know it! Things such as police arreting people who broke "mandates" could have been overriden by sheriffs.
If states had a governor like mine, the states complied with all of the insanity - because . . . democrats.
The theme of a Twitter thread I wrote some time ago (before being suspended for offering a professional medical opinion that was factually correct) was, "Look in the mirror, citizen." Whether we save the Republic or not depends on our taking up our responsibilities of active citizenship.
My comment is insanely off the topic, but "court of law" triggers me. I finally read "Uncle Tom's Cabin" a few years ago. I found the book was slow but the forward by Harriet Beecher Stowe was electrifying. She said she wrote the book out of outrage for the fugitive slave act, that allowed bounty hunters to track down slaves in free states and return them to slavery. Anybody giving the escaped slave help could be jailed. This was the direct result of the infamous supreme court Dred Scott Decision. A slave was brought into the State of Wisconsin that banned slavery. The Supreme Court threw out the 10th amendment and decided that a federal court could overrule a state. They could allow slavery to continue in the state of Wisconsin. They decided that federal courts were supreme over state law even where the 10th amendment forbade it.
No federal judge has ever understood that the 10th amendment is a limit on federal judges. Every damn last one of them should impeached and if found guilt of impeachment, be charged with treason and if found guilty, be hanged.
No state is bound by federal bureaucracy rules. They may be bound by federal law that is allowed by the constitution. The corollary to this, is any state agency is responsible for for rules they enforce. It does not matter what the CDC/NIH says. The stage agency has to be held responsible for rules they enforce. Must be legal. Must show due diligence. Referring to federal agencies is irreverent. They must audit the federal agency for accuracy and if the federal agency balks, they must ignore the agency as irrelevant.
It will never end it we don't start hanging some federal judges for treason.
So not so insanely off topic. Enforcing CDC rules by state officials is unlawful.
Not off topic and extremely fine comment.
Yeah, every time I hear someone quoting a SCOTUS ruling, I want to vomit. They have been tools forever. It just figures, that lawyers would devise a system of "checks and balances" almost all of which were written by, and favorable to, lawyers. Friggin lawyers.
The Declaration of Independence, as perfect a document as a government could need/heed, got into the hands of lawyers, and look what they did. Butchered the spirit of the declaration with a cold steel blade before we even got started.
'We the People" GAVE them something, and right away they started chipping away at it, all the while gouging us for the privilege of being robbed.
Ex doc but not an attorney. It's my understanding that states have way more power under the law than most people accept. Agencies like the CDC, FDA and NIH have ZERO authority do anything but issue guidelines. Guidelines are not law. None of the states voted on CDC policy they enforced them without putting the policy though the legislator, so all CDC policies are null and void. This is what my attorney tells me.
Indeed states have power, but a CEO can impose a mandate illegally (it is violation of the EUA terms to coerce compliance with an experimental intervention by leveraging jobs and providing NO informed consent) because he is afraid of insurance denials if CDC rules are not followed. Since a corrupt DOJ will never investigate and litigation is too expensive for most, the company gets its way. EFFECTIVELY the HHS agencies hold dictatorial power in a corrupt system.
Correct
How then do you read the WHO power grabbing amendments that would, in essence, cede sovereignty to the WHO in the next pandemic?
1. Any treaty requires 2/3 of the Senate to ratify.
2. No treaty can give up US sovereignty or supersede the US Constitution.
3. Our basic human rights come from God or are Natural. No laws, treaties, or black robes can take them away unless we allow it.
The most powerful word is NO.
I appreciate and like your comment but disagree in the basic premise or implication you make that Biden and handlers can’t find a way around that. Remember, there’s an obvious plan here for control and our OWN US dept of HHS is the one who wrote the amendments that would cede authority (or most of the amendments if not all). Can you tell me why they would do that? I can only guess. Anyone know if they have our loud or in writing actually stated their intent? Real question here.... anyone?
It's up to us individually and as a group if we allow it. A person with nothing to lose can be dangerous. Choose if you would rather due as a slave or as a free person. Unfortunately too many will choose slavery and are willing to die for it.
LauraJ just wrote the above comment and substack piblished it as though it was from props,children. Unless my phone or the server isn’t working and maybe it will autocorrect, I did NOT highjack props.children account.
Great comment!
Yes, and sheriffs also have tremendous power and discretion, but many of them (and most of the population) don't know it! Things such as police arreting people who broke "mandates" could have been overriden by sheriffs.
If states had a governor like mine, the states complied with all of the insanity - because . . . democrats.
The only thing the Feds can do is cut off medicare and medicaid
Beautifully written!!! 🇺🇸
Yep
The theme of a Twitter thread I wrote some time ago (before being suspended for offering a professional medical opinion that was factually correct) was, "Look in the mirror, citizen." Whether we save the Republic or not depends on our taking up our responsibilities of active citizenship.