In my own experience, the most common thing that red pills blue pill people is them having a catastrophe in their life that they are forced to confront. This approach is not consistent, as it requires a certain strength of character on their part and the seeds to to have already been planted around them for them to be red pilled. Additi…
In my own experience, the most common thing that red pills blue pill people is them having a catastrophe in their life that they are forced to confront. This approach is not consistent, as it requires a certain strength of character on their part and the seeds to to have already been planted around them for them to be red pilled. Additionally, people always behave like lemmings and they need a certain number of experts to come forward first in order for them to feel safe taking the position as well (doctors in particular like to hide with the crowd so that they are never held accountable for having an unpopular opinion… I have seen this all throughout my life). All of this is essentially why I agree with Mattias Desmet's theory that it is critical for people to take the personal risk necessary in order to speak out against the mass formation so that it can be broken.
Additionally, I put quite a bit of work into it, and finally put together an explanation for why the vaccines are causing a 5-6 month delayed death. If you are interested it can be viewed here:
To some degree Canada's Jordan Peterson came out against the shots during or after the Trucker Convoy(s), telling our PM to ditch the mandates. Yes, every little bit helps, speak your truth, now is definitely the time to 'hit em hard'.
I suppose you meant to say "speak your experience or story". It's high time we stopped this "your, my or their truth". The truth is objective and will always be so and not amenable to feelings or opinions. Urban dictionary defines "my truth has a non-negotiable personal opinion".
Interestingly, the people causing the C-19 MmRNA jab deaths and democide will also very easily claim all they did even though they are slaughtering humanity was them speaking their truth that the stupid jab was just fine. Can we blame them especially if they, families and circle of friends have been fine since taking the jab, after all they are only speaking their truth.
In response to Stepping22, the phrase 'your truth' may not have been the best in my quip. Essentially I agree with your point, but just as you rapped my knuckles I should point out something to yourself. Always try to look at the bigger picture, and the context specifically. Midwestern Doc was calling attention to the idea that we have to start or keep throwing shit against the wall, whether that seems to be working or not. Because shit, in the real world does make things grow. Today's seeds in the minds of the normies who took the shots, may grow later into political change.
Most people, essentially 90% or more make decisions based on emotions. The more patient and analytically minded folk justify their actions with rationalizations. We see this with doctors, the more educated or intelligent, the more they figuratively stand on their head to justify wrong decisions. The quest to only be rational, and that everybody be rational for ever more is just not going to happen unless we all become cyborgs ruled by AI. Humans, almost all of us have a need for religion, to believe in things. For the atheists who deny a creator, they believe in the state perhaps or rationalism like Ayn Rand etc. What I'm getting to, is to try to also avoid the plague of 'purity spiralling'. Humans are flawed, and we can be very simple at times, but we get there. At this point in time, we at least know that Mr. Swab is evil, we can accomplish things now that he has declared war on us. No need to attack each other before the main 'objective'.
Yes, I gather the "I have my truth, you have yours" is often a PoMo deconstruction move to ignore objectivity.
I think this whole thing is about critical thinking, and not being naïve about the fallout from mega corporations and power games. It's about how advertising became propaganda and coercion. It's about how will democracy work at a planetary level, rather than this broken "stakeholder capitalism" which looks like global fascism. It's about how the environmental movement made up of people who wanted clean air and water, became co-opted as a greenwash for everyone's manipulative agendas.
I would add it's about humans building systems which are too complex for us to understand, and they become pathological. It's a kind of complexity evil, where the sum becomes evil even whilst all the parts seem well meaning.
“...seem well meaning”? To some, perhaps. And one might ask “Well meaning for whom?” No doubt every chosen action seems well meaning at the time for the one performing the action. But well meaning for anyone else? In the case of a sociopathic actor only for a few. I've become quite convinced that the global top dogs are evil beyond my former worst imaginings, and consider the general public vermin to be subdued by whatever means without mercy. These unfathomably evil oligarchs know that should enough of the masses wise up to how they've suffered at their hands, their days of ease would be numbered, as recent events in Sri Lanka have shown.
So many of the comments are exactly the way I feel. I am angry at these people much like I am at Biden voters and the climate change supporters. How can so many so called educated people swallow the pill. I will never understand it.
They really are Zombies! The spikes have reached their brains and started eating. It’s okay to die from the shot as long as you don’t get Covid! Oh, wait...
In my own experience, the most common thing that red pills blue pill people is them having a catastrophe in their life that they are forced to confront. This approach is not consistent, as it requires a certain strength of character on their part and the seeds to to have already been planted around them for them to be red pilled. Additionally, people always behave like lemmings and they need a certain number of experts to come forward first in order for them to feel safe taking the position as well (doctors in particular like to hide with the crowd so that they are never held accountable for having an unpopular opinion… I have seen this all throughout my life). All of this is essentially why I agree with Mattias Desmet's theory that it is critical for people to take the personal risk necessary in order to speak out against the mass formation so that it can be broken.
Additionally, I put quite a bit of work into it, and finally put together an explanation for why the vaccines are causing a 5-6 month delayed death. If you are interested it can be viewed here:
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-sudden-death
Wow. This Mattias Desmet's Theory must be a rare and precious find. Never heard anybody else saying that.
To some degree Canada's Jordan Peterson came out against the shots during or after the Trucker Convoy(s), telling our PM to ditch the mandates. Yes, every little bit helps, speak your truth, now is definitely the time to 'hit em hard'.
No disrespect or offence meant...
I suppose you meant to say "speak your experience or story". It's high time we stopped this "your, my or their truth". The truth is objective and will always be so and not amenable to feelings or opinions. Urban dictionary defines "my truth has a non-negotiable personal opinion".
Interestingly, the people causing the C-19 MmRNA jab deaths and democide will also very easily claim all they did even though they are slaughtering humanity was them speaking their truth that the stupid jab was just fine. Can we blame them especially if they, families and circle of friends have been fine since taking the jab, after all they are only speaking their truth.
In response to Stepping22, the phrase 'your truth' may not have been the best in my quip. Essentially I agree with your point, but just as you rapped my knuckles I should point out something to yourself. Always try to look at the bigger picture, and the context specifically. Midwestern Doc was calling attention to the idea that we have to start or keep throwing shit against the wall, whether that seems to be working or not. Because shit, in the real world does make things grow. Today's seeds in the minds of the normies who took the shots, may grow later into political change.
Most people, essentially 90% or more make decisions based on emotions. The more patient and analytically minded folk justify their actions with rationalizations. We see this with doctors, the more educated or intelligent, the more they figuratively stand on their head to justify wrong decisions. The quest to only be rational, and that everybody be rational for ever more is just not going to happen unless we all become cyborgs ruled by AI. Humans, almost all of us have a need for religion, to believe in things. For the atheists who deny a creator, they believe in the state perhaps or rationalism like Ayn Rand etc. What I'm getting to, is to try to also avoid the plague of 'purity spiralling'. Humans are flawed, and we can be very simple at times, but we get there. At this point in time, we at least know that Mr. Swab is evil, we can accomplish things now that he has declared war on us. No need to attack each other before the main 'objective'.
Yes, I gather the "I have my truth, you have yours" is often a PoMo deconstruction move to ignore objectivity.
I think this whole thing is about critical thinking, and not being naïve about the fallout from mega corporations and power games. It's about how advertising became propaganda and coercion. It's about how will democracy work at a planetary level, rather than this broken "stakeholder capitalism" which looks like global fascism. It's about how the environmental movement made up of people who wanted clean air and water, became co-opted as a greenwash for everyone's manipulative agendas.
I would add it's about humans building systems which are too complex for us to understand, and they become pathological. It's a kind of complexity evil, where the sum becomes evil even whilst all the parts seem well meaning.
“...seem well meaning”? To some, perhaps. And one might ask “Well meaning for whom?” No doubt every chosen action seems well meaning at the time for the one performing the action. But well meaning for anyone else? In the case of a sociopathic actor only for a few. I've become quite convinced that the global top dogs are evil beyond my former worst imaginings, and consider the general public vermin to be subdued by whatever means without mercy. These unfathomably evil oligarchs know that should enough of the masses wise up to how they've suffered at their hands, their days of ease would be numbered, as recent events in Sri Lanka have shown.
lemons...or *lemmings?
There is a great joke to be made there but you are correct; thank you for the catch.
I'd...like to hear that joke! 🤔
It's not very appropriate...
Okay, okay! Understood.
added to my 5 month article.
Thank you.
So many of the comments are exactly the way I feel. I am angry at these people much like I am at Biden voters and the climate change supporters. How can so many so called educated people swallow the pill. I will never understand it.
This is inconceivable to me. Someone drops dead in front of you & you don’t run for the hills? 😳
They screamed tho... according to reports.
Oh, well that’s good to know. 😵💫 So they are only 3/4 Zombies.
They really are Zombies! The spikes have reached their brains and started eating. It’s okay to die from the shot as long as you don’t get Covid! Oh, wait...