Tina Peters was the heroine of the Selection Code movie that I've written about before. I interviewed her to find out what has happened since the movie was released.
Don’t know if anyone else thinks this is a good idea, but I’m thinking about the info that would red-pill SK even more if we all encouraged him to interview Dr Douglas Frank. I believe Frank would catch Steve up about how the algorithms were set on the machines.
How would one explain (if the cause of the database copies was that clerk doing a reset of the machine)...the claim in the last 15 minutes of the movie that only a certain set of votes differed between the presumed original database file and the copy of it: And that the set of these votes differed significantly in the proportion of the two main candidates--I guess Biden and Trump? Way beyond the margin of error. That was stated and a graph shown by the two forensic people in the last 15 minutes of the movie.
Steve - thank you for looking into the details. There is also a rebuttal to the DA's rebuttal, with many points I think you will find interesting. Please note the straw-man arguments which are not obvious to the casual reader, and the question why the camera stopped recording for 2 minutes and 34 seconds. IMHO the best statement regarding the above point was:
"The DA’s office discussed a possible method by which the new database could have been
created, should a clerk perform a highly unusual procedure which is extremely dangerous when done in the middle of tabulating an election. The video presented as “evidence” shows absolutely no definitive screen detail to support the DA’s claims that this “nuclear option” was ever performed. In addition, the EMS logs, which show in great detail the operations performed by both the clerks and the normal automated processes within the Dominion software application, show no corresponding commands being initiated. This fact alone is evidence that the unauthorized operations were triggered by code running within the EMS server but outside of normal procedure. "
That URL didn't work for me but I'll try to get there via some link off of what may be the main page, causeofamerica.
I'm still hypothesizing, even after the DA's report, that the DA's report may be a fabric of truths plus lies, but overall a lie-> support for making an example of those two election workers.
If there were nefarious data manipulation inside an election machine actually caught by the likes of competent forensic people, exactly this would happen: A competent-sounding "nothing to see here" for the adults in the room, the blue-pill crowd, by an authoritative adult, like a DA. Who has ever heard of a dishonest DA? (sarcasm).
Is it just me or do the searches and seizures seem a bit extreme, and maybe tell a tale?
Number6, I think you have the right of it. When you look at the totality of the evidence, it is hard to accept that this election was free and fair. Sure, maybe Tina and O'DONNELL could have worked on clarity and accuracy... that is true I suppose of the entire effort to prove fraud in 2020. However, I cut Tina quite a bit of slack. She is neither a technical expert nor a lawyer. She's a gold star mom who did her job and has been treated worse than most criminals. Alec Baldwin allegedly killed a woman and yet he has been handled with kid gloves, though it does look as if justice is finally coming his way. Tina made a forensic copy of an election machine before a software update could be done. Election data was deleted during that update despite the fact that election records are required to be kept for 22 months. Dominion lied about the purpose of the update. Then, the searches, seizures and so on.
So we know that 1. She was just doing the job she was elected to do, 2. She discovered that Dominion deleted data and 3. Tinas political rival (SOS) abused her power - searches, seizures, etc.
Now we have DA report vs Selection Code. The DA report is professional, clear, and compelling. It builds a fact based argument to draw a conclusion but mixes in just enough supposition to suggest an alternative theory of the facts.
It could be easy to find yourself thinking maybe the DA has the right of it.
But then you remember 2000 mules, you remember the illegal rule changes, you remember Biden getting 81M votes while campaigning from his basement, you remember Trump losing despite winning tge key bellwether counties and adding 6M votes, you remember all the mathematical impossibilities that have been shown by people like Dr Frank and Daria and others, you remember that Pennsylvania sued Dominion for IP addresses in the logs from Canada when the machines aren't supposed to be connected to the internet, and you remember that Ratcliff was supposed to produce a report on election interference by Dec 18th 2020 but did not do so because the intelligence agencies couldn't agree... though he did say there was Chinese interference. And of course let's not forget the planned coup on Jan 6th where we now know that FBI informants were in the crowd agitating for violence in order to press congress to stop objecting to the vote and just affirm Biden as the winner which us exactly what happened.
Once you remember all that, that supposition the DA used to make the facts tell another story suddenly becomes a big red flag. Because while the supposition can provide an alternative theory of the cause and meaning of the reset, it cannot explain everything else.
By your question it seems obvious you are already thinking like this. We just have to make sure we don't lose the forrest for the trees here. The totality of the evidence is overwhelming.
Sorry, I didn't realize it was showing up that way. Not sure how to get one simple URL (search engines seem to be making it difficult!), but you can find it by going to https://causeofamerica.org/TheLibrary and doing a search on "tina peters corporon". It is the PDF entitled 2022-May-20-CO-Official-Response-to-Mesa-DA-Investigation-from-Randy-Corporon.pdf. Let me know if that doesn't work for you.
The two comments you lifted for us are spot-on in regards to Tina. Having said that, she's just one of those "regular people" who got involved in a complicated and, therefore, confusing set of circumstances, spoke her mind, and now is being unmercifully punished for it. What her state's election commission in concert with a prosecutorial abuse intent exercised by its Colorado Department of Law is doing to her is unspeakable. Speak up and you will be punished is the norm these days. Unfortunately, she's not a good speaker to begin with and she's understandably emotional. She's facing some serious prison time. Not sure how this is going to go down for her. She seems like a nice enough person.
As Steve is known for being a great inventor, I would like to ask, if he'd consider designing open systems to help elections? Like calculators or punch card sorting machines for printed ballots, open source hardware that's built, tested, and maintained by common people; Define a standard that addresses the issues in practical terms.
Pennsylvania County Sues Dominion Voting Systems for 'Unauthorized Python Script' & 'Foreign IP Address'
==============================================
The report alleges that Fulton County’s log files show “an external IP address” located in Quebec, Canada, and that an unauthorized “python script” had been installed after the certification date.
Moreover, the system’s security patch had not been updated since April 10, 2019, and default usernames and passwords had not been changed since the time of installation.
The report says, "This python script can exploit and create any number of vulnerabilities including, external access to the system, data export of the tabulations, or introduction of other metrics not part of or allowed by the certification process."
What’s more, this “external IP address” was found on the very same adjudication workstation that contained the “post certification python script”.
==============================================
I also highly suggest Kanekoa's own investigation into Konnech and other issues dealing with voting integrity:
The 36 wireless devices --I'm curious what these were and how they connected. Is it possible one of these devices (maybe 36 for redundancy but only one connects at a time) creates a rogue hotspot that connects with the tabulation server? Maybe like USB WIFI dongles? The nano usb wifi dongles are the size of small usb jump drives -- not pencil lead thin.
Honestly, they're using Microsoft technology which is the least secure software. Why don't they put the tabulation server in the middle of a public street while they're at it.
I found the part about how easy it would be to connect to the EMS network starting on pg. 76. It also says there were 35 devices with the DVS-supplied equipment that had a built-it wireless card or device installed. So it sounds like these were spread across multiple systems/devices and anyone could have been leveraged for an attack.
Thank you for all of your efforts and hard work on the COVID vax debacle. Also, thank you for shedding light on Election Integrity to your followers. Many of the frustrations, attacks and censorship that the medical community is fighting is also happening on the election integrity front. Please consider reaching out to Capt. Seth Keshel and interviewing him on his intelligence analysis on elections (national and state by state). His analyses is based on open-source information and independently corroborates 2000 mules findings.
Capt. Seth Keshel's Substack if you would like to take a peek:
I'm not familiar with the Selection Code and all that, but I do think these general rules and guidelines make a lot of sense. Great job. Whenever a person embraces a theory that counters the mainstream narrative, it really helps to be *more* persuasive, careful in reasoning, patient and just plain likable as a personality.
As a general rule, anyone who argues for a so-called "fringe" theory should try really hard to avoid becoming an unreasonable, bloviating, rude, screaming, angry voice that cannot answer questions in an honest and factual way. Such behaviors do not persuade.
In reply to your ‘keep in mind’ commenters’ criticism, let’s also keep in mind that the candidate who beat her vote total in the recent SoS primary election by 70,000 votes didn’t even move the needle in the pre-election polls and raised only 4 figures of campaign funds compared to Tina’s 6 or 7 figure campaign chest and poll leading numbers. His 70,000 supporters could not be found on his Twitter or FB account either. Oh, and he didn’t win, but the gal who did? Well she took the Zucker money in 2020. Colorado is a mirror of the corrupt national election system; it stinks, and if you think we’re going to “take back the house and senate” with this kind of thing going on in November, you’re sadly mistaken. So, critical commenters, go ahead and diss the only chance you had to veer away from the iceberg of total domination by the left in your MJ-smoke filled state. Choke on it once more until there’s nobody left to Heimlich you.
Steve, I watched the Tina Peter's video. It was very informative but I have been aware of a lot of what Tina mentioned because I have been following her for a long time. Colorado is so corrupt!! Bannon's show is such a great place to see and find facts. It seemed you were a little taken aback by some of Tina's information. It seemed some of Tina's information showed doubt on your face. I hope you do more research to find her truth. Just think of everyone on the left who don't know or won't want to know more of the truth about what Tina has been through. Such a nice and informative video. Your Covid information is great reading and truthful. Thank you for informing me more. We, the right, have so far to go to get America back to normal. We must vote November 8 to change this horrible direction.
Unlike many who shamelessly ignore their sworn oaths of office, Clerk Tina Peters has unwaveringly fulfilled her sworn duties despite the mercyless lawfare by those in Colorado who don't want the corrupt system to change. Yet, the evidence is there for all to see. The legal fees for Peters are staggering, while the state has limitless funding, thanks to the taxpayers and out of state sources. Go to her site and help if you can.
Don’t know if anyone else thinks this is a good idea, but I’m thinking about the info that would red-pill SK even more if we all encouraged him to interview Dr Douglas Frank. I believe Frank would catch Steve up about how the algorithms were set on the machines.
How would one explain (if the cause of the database copies was that clerk doing a reset of the machine)...the claim in the last 15 minutes of the movie that only a certain set of votes differed between the presumed original database file and the copy of it: And that the set of these votes differed significantly in the proportion of the two main candidates--I guess Biden and Trump? Way beyond the margin of error. That was stated and a graph shown by the two forensic people in the last 15 minutes of the movie.
Thank you for the links.
wow. Adding this to the text of my post. My reading of your documents, I agree with you.
Steve - thank you for looking into the details. There is also a rebuttal to the DA's rebuttal, with many points I think you will find interesting. Please note the straw-man arguments which are not obvious to the casual reader, and the question why the camera stopped recording for 2 minutes and 34 seconds. IMHO the best statement regarding the above point was:
"The DA’s office discussed a possible method by which the new database could have been
created, should a clerk perform a highly unusual procedure which is extremely dangerous when done in the middle of tabulating an election. The video presented as “evidence” shows absolutely no definitive screen detail to support the DA’s claims that this “nuclear option” was ever performed. In addition, the EMS logs, which show in great detail the operations performed by both the clerks and the normal automated processes within the Dominion software application, show no corresponding commands being initiated. This fact alone is evidence that the unauthorized operations were triggered by code running within the EMS server but outside of normal procedure. "
https://storage.causeofamerica.org/coa/05a3b2d9-f85a-43dc-8c74-f25f3059f54c.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=NTk0N2E5ZjdmNDJkNWM2%2F20220921%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20220921T211756Z&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=01d1fa2f0c6057c43622e8c26237a1110bc7d5e3bd3b1ac30d4c07e748b6a279
This URL worked https://storage.causeofamerica.org/coa/05a3b2d9-f85a-43dc-8c74-f25f3059f54c.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=NTk0N2E5ZjdmNDJkNWM2%2F20220922%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20220922T002724Z&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=32c4797a6e417e7ee51ad1f18e752c3215110532769a9634b9c8d2bd0c73495c.
But it might be more fruitful in the search https://causeofamerica.org/Documents/Category?query=tina+peters&btnSearch=Search.
One can imagine the difficulties in really understanding what these reports are saying. You can quickly get exhausted by minutia.
That URL didn't work for me but I'll try to get there via some link off of what may be the main page, causeofamerica.
I'm still hypothesizing, even after the DA's report, that the DA's report may be a fabric of truths plus lies, but overall a lie-> support for making an example of those two election workers.
If there were nefarious data manipulation inside an election machine actually caught by the likes of competent forensic people, exactly this would happen: A competent-sounding "nothing to see here" for the adults in the room, the blue-pill crowd, by an authoritative adult, like a DA. Who has ever heard of a dishonest DA? (sarcasm).
Is it just me or do the searches and seizures seem a bit extreme, and maybe tell a tale?
Number6, I think you have the right of it. When you look at the totality of the evidence, it is hard to accept that this election was free and fair. Sure, maybe Tina and O'DONNELL could have worked on clarity and accuracy... that is true I suppose of the entire effort to prove fraud in 2020. However, I cut Tina quite a bit of slack. She is neither a technical expert nor a lawyer. She's a gold star mom who did her job and has been treated worse than most criminals. Alec Baldwin allegedly killed a woman and yet he has been handled with kid gloves, though it does look as if justice is finally coming his way. Tina made a forensic copy of an election machine before a software update could be done. Election data was deleted during that update despite the fact that election records are required to be kept for 22 months. Dominion lied about the purpose of the update. Then, the searches, seizures and so on.
So we know that 1. She was just doing the job she was elected to do, 2. She discovered that Dominion deleted data and 3. Tinas political rival (SOS) abused her power - searches, seizures, etc.
Now we have DA report vs Selection Code. The DA report is professional, clear, and compelling. It builds a fact based argument to draw a conclusion but mixes in just enough supposition to suggest an alternative theory of the facts.
It could be easy to find yourself thinking maybe the DA has the right of it.
But then you remember 2000 mules, you remember the illegal rule changes, you remember Biden getting 81M votes while campaigning from his basement, you remember Trump losing despite winning tge key bellwether counties and adding 6M votes, you remember all the mathematical impossibilities that have been shown by people like Dr Frank and Daria and others, you remember that Pennsylvania sued Dominion for IP addresses in the logs from Canada when the machines aren't supposed to be connected to the internet, and you remember that Ratcliff was supposed to produce a report on election interference by Dec 18th 2020 but did not do so because the intelligence agencies couldn't agree... though he did say there was Chinese interference. And of course let's not forget the planned coup on Jan 6th where we now know that FBI informants were in the crowd agitating for violence in order to press congress to stop objecting to the vote and just affirm Biden as the winner which us exactly what happened.
Once you remember all that, that supposition the DA used to make the facts tell another story suddenly becomes a big red flag. Because while the supposition can provide an alternative theory of the cause and meaning of the reset, it cannot explain everything else.
By your question it seems obvious you are already thinking like this. We just have to make sure we don't lose the forrest for the trees here. The totality of the evidence is overwhelming.
Sorry, I didn't realize it was showing up that way. Not sure how to get one simple URL (search engines seem to be making it difficult!), but you can find it by going to https://causeofamerica.org/TheLibrary and doing a search on "tina peters corporon". It is the PDF entitled 2022-May-20-CO-Official-Response-to-Mesa-DA-Investigation-from-Randy-Corporon.pdf. Let me know if that doesn't work for you.
The two comments you lifted for us are spot-on in regards to Tina. Having said that, she's just one of those "regular people" who got involved in a complicated and, therefore, confusing set of circumstances, spoke her mind, and now is being unmercifully punished for it. What her state's election commission in concert with a prosecutorial abuse intent exercised by its Colorado Department of Law is doing to her is unspeakable. Speak up and you will be punished is the norm these days. Unfortunately, she's not a good speaker to begin with and she's understandably emotional. She's facing some serious prison time. Not sure how this is going to go down for her. She seems like a nice enough person.
Call Mike Lindell. Even better - have Mike connect you with Douglas Frank out of Cincinnati Ohio.
https://truthandliberty.net/bio/dr-douglas-g-frank/
As Steve is known for being a great inventor, I would like to ask, if he'd consider designing open systems to help elections? Like calculators or punch card sorting machines for printed ballots, open source hardware that's built, tested, and maintained by common people; Define a standard that addresses the issues in practical terms.
Similar issues were documented before as "Fraction Magic"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fob-AGgZn44
Have you seen this recent news?
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/pennsylvania-county-sues-dominion
Pennsylvania County Sues Dominion Voting Systems for 'Unauthorized Python Script' & 'Foreign IP Address'
==============================================
The report alleges that Fulton County’s log files show “an external IP address” located in Quebec, Canada, and that an unauthorized “python script” had been installed after the certification date.
Moreover, the system’s security patch had not been updated since April 10, 2019, and default usernames and passwords had not been changed since the time of installation.
The report says, "This python script can exploit and create any number of vulnerabilities including, external access to the system, data export of the tabulations, or introduction of other metrics not part of or allowed by the certification process."
What’s more, this “external IP address” was found on the very same adjudication workstation that contained the “post certification python script”.
==============================================
I also highly suggest Kanekoa's own investigation into Konnech and other issues dealing with voting integrity:
https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/us-election-company-previously-registered
as well as collected reporting of other news:
https://substack.com/profile/49200940-kanekoathegreat
Steve, you are a good journalist.
Thankyou for revealing this again and also including the thoughtful and unbiased comments regarding Tina
The 36 wireless devices --I'm curious what these were and how they connected. Is it possible one of these devices (maybe 36 for redundancy but only one connects at a time) creates a rogue hotspot that connects with the tabulation server? Maybe like USB WIFI dongles? The nano usb wifi dongles are the size of small usb jump drives -- not pencil lead thin.
Honestly, they're using Microsoft technology which is the least secure software. Why don't they put the tabulation server in the middle of a public street while they're at it.
I found the part about how easy it would be to connect to the EMS network starting on pg. 76. It also says there were 35 devices with the DVS-supplied equipment that had a built-it wireless card or device installed. So it sounds like these were spread across multiple systems/devices and anyone could have been leveraged for an attack.
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/620c3af99f21b965e2cbef44/t/62268289a0e00c56951c5044/1646690974087/mesa-county-forensic-report-no.-2+compressed+1.1.pdf
Hey Steve, check out Patrick Byrne's Rumbles regarding Fulton County, Pa.
The government is suing Dominion and has found things on its machines similar to what Tina Peter's has found.
https://rumble.com/v1kykbf-fulton-county-pennsylvania-sues-dominion.html
Thank you for all of your efforts and hard work on the COVID vax debacle. Also, thank you for shedding light on Election Integrity to your followers. Many of the frustrations, attacks and censorship that the medical community is fighting is also happening on the election integrity front. Please consider reaching out to Capt. Seth Keshel and interviewing him on his intelligence analysis on elections (national and state by state). His analyses is based on open-source information and independently corroborates 2000 mules findings.
Capt. Seth Keshel's Substack if you would like to take a peek:
https://substack.com/profile/53559721-capt-seth-keshel?utm_source=about-page
I'm not familiar with the Selection Code and all that, but I do think these general rules and guidelines make a lot of sense. Great job. Whenever a person embraces a theory that counters the mainstream narrative, it really helps to be *more* persuasive, careful in reasoning, patient and just plain likable as a personality.
As a general rule, anyone who argues for a so-called "fringe" theory should try really hard to avoid becoming an unreasonable, bloviating, rude, screaming, angry voice that cannot answer questions in an honest and factual way. Such behaviors do not persuade.
In reply to your ‘keep in mind’ commenters’ criticism, let’s also keep in mind that the candidate who beat her vote total in the recent SoS primary election by 70,000 votes didn’t even move the needle in the pre-election polls and raised only 4 figures of campaign funds compared to Tina’s 6 or 7 figure campaign chest and poll leading numbers. His 70,000 supporters could not be found on his Twitter or FB account either. Oh, and he didn’t win, but the gal who did? Well she took the Zucker money in 2020. Colorado is a mirror of the corrupt national election system; it stinks, and if you think we’re going to “take back the house and senate” with this kind of thing going on in November, you’re sadly mistaken. So, critical commenters, go ahead and diss the only chance you had to veer away from the iceberg of total domination by the left in your MJ-smoke filled state. Choke on it once more until there’s nobody left to Heimlich you.
Steve, I watched the Tina Peter's video. It was very informative but I have been aware of a lot of what Tina mentioned because I have been following her for a long time. Colorado is so corrupt!! Bannon's show is such a great place to see and find facts. It seemed you were a little taken aback by some of Tina's information. It seemed some of Tina's information showed doubt on your face. I hope you do more research to find her truth. Just think of everyone on the left who don't know or won't want to know more of the truth about what Tina has been through. Such a nice and informative video. Your Covid information is great reading and truthful. Thank you for informing me more. We, the right, have so far to go to get America back to normal. We must vote November 8 to change this horrible direction.
Here's the instructions for the Dominion voting machines:
https://360newslasvegas.com/the-complete-dominion-election-system-manual/
https://360newslasvegas.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/UG-RTR-UserGuide-5-11-CO.pdf
Chapter 8 is how to change teh votes to anything you want.
Unlike many who shamelessly ignore their sworn oaths of office, Clerk Tina Peters has unwaveringly fulfilled her sworn duties despite the mercyless lawfare by those in Colorado who don't want the corrupt system to change. Yet, the evidence is there for all to see. The legal fees for Peters are staggering, while the state has limitless funding, thanks to the taxpayers and out of state sources. Go to her site and help if you can.