Don’t know if anyone else thinks this is a good idea, but I’m thinking about the info that would red-pill SK even more if we all encouraged him to interview Dr Douglas Frank. I believe Frank would catch Steve up about how the algorithms were set on the machines.
How would one explain (if the cause of the database copies was that clerk doing a reset of the machine)...the claim in the last 15 minutes of the movie that only a certain set of votes differed between the presumed original database file and the copy of it: And that the set of these votes differed significantly in the proportion of the two main candidates--I guess Biden and Trump? Way beyond the margin of error. That was stated and a graph shown by the two forensic people in the last 15 minutes of the movie.
Steve - thank you for looking into the details. There is also a rebuttal to the DA's rebuttal, with many points I think you will find interesting. Please note the straw-man arguments which are not obvious to the casual reader, and the question why the camera stopped recording for 2 minutes and 34 seconds. IMHO the best statement regarding the above point was:
"The DA’s office discussed a possible method by which the new database could have been
created, should a clerk perform a highly unusual procedure which is extremely dangerous when done in the middle of tabulating an election. The video presented as “evidence” shows absolutely no definitive screen detail to support the DA’s claims that this “nuclear option” was ever performed. In addition, the EMS logs, which show in great detail the operations performed by both the clerks and the normal automated processes within the Dominion software application, show no corresponding commands being initiated. This fact alone is evidence that the unauthorized operations were triggered by code running within the EMS server but outside of normal procedure. "
That URL didn't work for me but I'll try to get there via some link off of what may be the main page, causeofamerica.
I'm still hypothesizing, even after the DA's report, that the DA's report may be a fabric of truths plus lies, but overall a lie-> support for making an example of those two election workers.
If there were nefarious data manipulation inside an election machine actually caught by the likes of competent forensic people, exactly this would happen: A competent-sounding "nothing to see here" for the adults in the room, the blue-pill crowd, by an authoritative adult, like a DA. Who has ever heard of a dishonest DA? (sarcasm).
Is it just me or do the searches and seizures seem a bit extreme, and maybe tell a tale?
Number6, I think you have the right of it. When you look at the totality of the evidence, it is hard to accept that this election was free and fair. Sure, maybe Tina and O'DONNELL could have worked on clarity and accuracy... that is true I suppose of the entire effort to prove fraud in 2020. However, I cut Tina quite a bit of slack. She is neither a technical expert nor a lawyer. She's a gold star mom who did her job and has been treated worse than most criminals. Alec Baldwin allegedly killed a woman and yet he has been handled with kid gloves, though it does look as if justice is finally coming his way. Tina made a forensic copy of an election machine before a software update could be done. Election data was deleted during that update despite the fact that election records are required to be kept for 22 months. Dominion lied about the purpose of the update. Then, the searches, seizures and so on.
So we know that 1. She was just doing the job she was elected to do, 2. She discovered that Dominion deleted data and 3. Tinas political rival (SOS) abused her power - searches, seizures, etc.
Now we have DA report vs Selection Code. The DA report is professional, clear, and compelling. It builds a fact based argument to draw a conclusion but mixes in just enough supposition to suggest an alternative theory of the facts.
It could be easy to find yourself thinking maybe the DA has the right of it.
But then you remember 2000 mules, you remember the illegal rule changes, you remember Biden getting 81M votes while campaigning from his basement, you remember Trump losing despite winning tge key bellwether counties and adding 6M votes, you remember all the mathematical impossibilities that have been shown by people like Dr Frank and Daria and others, you remember that Pennsylvania sued Dominion for IP addresses in the logs from Canada when the machines aren't supposed to be connected to the internet, and you remember that Ratcliff was supposed to produce a report on election interference by Dec 18th 2020 but did not do so because the intelligence agencies couldn't agree... though he did say there was Chinese interference. And of course let's not forget the planned coup on Jan 6th where we now know that FBI informants were in the crowd agitating for violence in order to press congress to stop objecting to the vote and just affirm Biden as the winner which us exactly what happened.
Once you remember all that, that supposition the DA used to make the facts tell another story suddenly becomes a big red flag. Because while the supposition can provide an alternative theory of the cause and meaning of the reset, it cannot explain everything else.
By your question it seems obvious you are already thinking like this. We just have to make sure we don't lose the forrest for the trees here. The totality of the evidence is overwhelming.
Sorry, I didn't realize it was showing up that way. Not sure how to get one simple URL (search engines seem to be making it difficult!), but you can find it by going to https://causeofamerica.org/TheLibrary and doing a search on "tina peters corporon". It is the PDF entitled 2022-May-20-CO-Official-Response-to-Mesa-DA-Investigation-from-Randy-Corporon.pdf. Let me know if that doesn't work for you.
Don’t know if anyone else thinks this is a good idea, but I’m thinking about the info that would red-pill SK even more if we all encouraged him to interview Dr Douglas Frank. I believe Frank would catch Steve up about how the algorithms were set on the machines.
How would one explain (if the cause of the database copies was that clerk doing a reset of the machine)...the claim in the last 15 minutes of the movie that only a certain set of votes differed between the presumed original database file and the copy of it: And that the set of these votes differed significantly in the proportion of the two main candidates--I guess Biden and Trump? Way beyond the margin of error. That was stated and a graph shown by the two forensic people in the last 15 minutes of the movie.
Thank you for the links.
wow. Adding this to the text of my post. My reading of your documents, I agree with you.
Steve - thank you for looking into the details. There is also a rebuttal to the DA's rebuttal, with many points I think you will find interesting. Please note the straw-man arguments which are not obvious to the casual reader, and the question why the camera stopped recording for 2 minutes and 34 seconds. IMHO the best statement regarding the above point was:
"The DA’s office discussed a possible method by which the new database could have been
created, should a clerk perform a highly unusual procedure which is extremely dangerous when done in the middle of tabulating an election. The video presented as “evidence” shows absolutely no definitive screen detail to support the DA’s claims that this “nuclear option” was ever performed. In addition, the EMS logs, which show in great detail the operations performed by both the clerks and the normal automated processes within the Dominion software application, show no corresponding commands being initiated. This fact alone is evidence that the unauthorized operations were triggered by code running within the EMS server but outside of normal procedure. "
https://storage.causeofamerica.org/coa/05a3b2d9-f85a-43dc-8c74-f25f3059f54c.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=NTk0N2E5ZjdmNDJkNWM2%2F20220921%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20220921T211756Z&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=01d1fa2f0c6057c43622e8c26237a1110bc7d5e3bd3b1ac30d4c07e748b6a279
This URL worked https://storage.causeofamerica.org/coa/05a3b2d9-f85a-43dc-8c74-f25f3059f54c.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=NTk0N2E5ZjdmNDJkNWM2%2F20220922%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20220922T002724Z&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Signature=32c4797a6e417e7ee51ad1f18e752c3215110532769a9634b9c8d2bd0c73495c.
But it might be more fruitful in the search https://causeofamerica.org/Documents/Category?query=tina+peters&btnSearch=Search.
One can imagine the difficulties in really understanding what these reports are saying. You can quickly get exhausted by minutia.
That URL didn't work for me but I'll try to get there via some link off of what may be the main page, causeofamerica.
I'm still hypothesizing, even after the DA's report, that the DA's report may be a fabric of truths plus lies, but overall a lie-> support for making an example of those two election workers.
If there were nefarious data manipulation inside an election machine actually caught by the likes of competent forensic people, exactly this would happen: A competent-sounding "nothing to see here" for the adults in the room, the blue-pill crowd, by an authoritative adult, like a DA. Who has ever heard of a dishonest DA? (sarcasm).
Is it just me or do the searches and seizures seem a bit extreme, and maybe tell a tale?
Number6, I think you have the right of it. When you look at the totality of the evidence, it is hard to accept that this election was free and fair. Sure, maybe Tina and O'DONNELL could have worked on clarity and accuracy... that is true I suppose of the entire effort to prove fraud in 2020. However, I cut Tina quite a bit of slack. She is neither a technical expert nor a lawyer. She's a gold star mom who did her job and has been treated worse than most criminals. Alec Baldwin allegedly killed a woman and yet he has been handled with kid gloves, though it does look as if justice is finally coming his way. Tina made a forensic copy of an election machine before a software update could be done. Election data was deleted during that update despite the fact that election records are required to be kept for 22 months. Dominion lied about the purpose of the update. Then, the searches, seizures and so on.
So we know that 1. She was just doing the job she was elected to do, 2. She discovered that Dominion deleted data and 3. Tinas political rival (SOS) abused her power - searches, seizures, etc.
Now we have DA report vs Selection Code. The DA report is professional, clear, and compelling. It builds a fact based argument to draw a conclusion but mixes in just enough supposition to suggest an alternative theory of the facts.
It could be easy to find yourself thinking maybe the DA has the right of it.
But then you remember 2000 mules, you remember the illegal rule changes, you remember Biden getting 81M votes while campaigning from his basement, you remember Trump losing despite winning tge key bellwether counties and adding 6M votes, you remember all the mathematical impossibilities that have been shown by people like Dr Frank and Daria and others, you remember that Pennsylvania sued Dominion for IP addresses in the logs from Canada when the machines aren't supposed to be connected to the internet, and you remember that Ratcliff was supposed to produce a report on election interference by Dec 18th 2020 but did not do so because the intelligence agencies couldn't agree... though he did say there was Chinese interference. And of course let's not forget the planned coup on Jan 6th where we now know that FBI informants were in the crowd agitating for violence in order to press congress to stop objecting to the vote and just affirm Biden as the winner which us exactly what happened.
Once you remember all that, that supposition the DA used to make the facts tell another story suddenly becomes a big red flag. Because while the supposition can provide an alternative theory of the cause and meaning of the reset, it cannot explain everything else.
By your question it seems obvious you are already thinking like this. We just have to make sure we don't lose the forrest for the trees here. The totality of the evidence is overwhelming.
Sorry, I didn't realize it was showing up that way. Not sure how to get one simple URL (search engines seem to be making it difficult!), but you can find it by going to https://causeofamerica.org/TheLibrary and doing a search on "tina peters corporon". It is the PDF entitled 2022-May-20-CO-Official-Response-to-Mesa-DA-Investigation-from-Randy-Corporon.pdf. Let me know if that doesn't work for you.