I can mail you the full post. I took the liberty to post the text here. Please indicate if this pollutes the comment setcion in your opinion. if so, I'll delete it.
I am currently kicking myself because I saw Dave's post three weeks ago, and when Steve posted this new substack article, I didn't connect the two. Two different approaches coming up with the same answer...amazing. I don't pretend to understand the stats - I can barely do correlations when python does all the hard work.
Dave also theorized that there could be two peaks; one smaller one immediately following vaccination (visible in VAERS), and another much more impactful one 5 months in (visible in the larger data sets). Maybe - two methods of action at work?
If true, the "second peak" might mean that Steve has ... grossly undercounted the deaths by relying on VAERS numbers, which only looks at that first peak.
you must be a member to view your link
I can mail you the full post. I took the liberty to post the text here. Please indicate if this pollutes the comment setcion in your opinion. if so, I'll delete it.
DonтАЩt delete. Great stuff
I am currently kicking myself because I saw Dave's post three weeks ago, and when Steve posted this new substack article, I didn't connect the two. Two different approaches coming up with the same answer...amazing. I don't pretend to understand the stats - I can barely do correlations when python does all the hard work.
Dave also theorized that there could be two peaks; one smaller one immediately following vaccination (visible in VAERS), and another much more impactful one 5 months in (visible in the larger data sets). Maybe - two methods of action at work?
If true, the "second peak" might mean that Steve has ... grossly undercounted the deaths by relying on VAERS numbers, which only looks at that first peak.
I'm not quite sure what to think about that.
What to think?
Welcome to the shitshow.