He didn't know exactly what the developers of the actual mRNA "vaccine" had concocted. Much could have been done perfecting his work which took place decades before. He knew the nano lipids he used were dangerous but assumed at first responsible development and testing had occured.
He didn't know exactly what the developers of the actual mRNA "vaccine" had concocted. Much could have been done perfecting his work which took place decades before. He knew the nano lipids he used were dangerous but assumed at first responsible development and testing had occured.
Why is he suing Dr. Breggin who wrote the book "Covid 19 and the global Preditors" If your answer is the case, Malone should be encouraging Dr.Breggins book and not suing him.
He didn't know exactly what the developers of the actual mRNA "vaccine" had concocted. Much could have been done perfecting his work which took place decades before. He knew the nano lipids he used were dangerous but assumed at first responsible development and testing had occured.
Why is he suing Dr. Breggin who wrote the book "Covid 19 and the global Preditors" If your answer is the case, Malone should be encouraging Dr.Breggins book and not suing him.
I agree it was the wrong thing for Malone to do, but the Breggins accused him being controlled opposition without specific evidence.