Over the weekend I saw an article plotting comparative average life expectancy to per capita dollars spent on healthcare by country, with the US being an outlier for both axes. Now I can’t find the article anywhere online. Anyone have a link?
I'd like to see you account for the con-founder of actual Covid death waves and Covid deaths. Those deaths peaked in Aug of 2022 and remained intermittently elevated thereafter.
Hi Steve, just a head-up on your post here - the link to Stats NZ to download the graph from their data - it says it has 'expired'. They wouldn't want us seeing that kind of information ourselves so it looks like they won't just let you to point it out for us to download!
You wrote about John Sullivan's plot that "the key is the orange mortality rate goes from around 2,500 in August to over 5,000 in December".
However in 2018-2022, the CMR of the 80-89 age group in New Zealand ranged from about 6,635 to 7,419 deaths per 100,000 person-years, but the upper end of the age band is overrepresented in the NZ data compared to the lower end: https://mongol-fi.github.io/moar.html#Representation_of_age_groups_in_the_dataset. Based on the age composition of the vaccinated people, I got an average baseline of about 8,463 for the CMR in December 2021, which is higher than the historical CMR for ages 80-89 because the upper end of the age group is overrepresented in the data compared to the lower end, and because I followed people who were 80-89 years old at the time of vaccination, so many of them were more than half a year older by December 2021.
When I took the first dose of each person who was 80-89 years old at the time of their dose and I followed the crude mortality rate of the cohort on each day until the end of the data, I got the same brief spike in mortality in June 2021 as Sullivan, but after that it took until June 2022 before the 14-day moving average of the CMR reached above the baseline. And even then the CMR only stayed above the baseline briefly, and June 2022 was in the middle of a COVID wave, and it was winter but I didn't account for seasonality when I calculated my baseline: https://mongol-fi.github.io/moar.html#Plot_by_John_Sullivan_for_crude_mortality_rate_by_date_in_ages_80_89.
The reason why the CMR of ages 80-89 was initially so far below the baseline could be because the healthy vaccinee effect seems to be stronger in older age groups than younger age groups.
"seems to be stronger," ? what does it last for 4 months instead of just 3 ? I don't believe there is any prophylactic effect of the vaccine at any age group, that is just speculation. I am late 70's and have avoided any 'flu' vaccine as much more likely to cause contraction than to protect from it, and the same here. Focus should be on bolstering natural immune, and protocols for early intervention if necessary, but there is no magic pill that allows society to eat puke all their lives and then get a 'shot' when bad habits start killing oneself.
Steve how could the comparison of vaccine data about different population sets and different vaccines possibly be correlated or causated? It doesn't make any sense. your pole is asking if it's correlation or causation to compare the death rate to different vaccinations with different statistics given at different times to different populations. Comparing the death rate for a short period of time after the shot. I am referring to a year or two as a short period of time. How could it possibly be correlation or causation?
This is not on point, but this article says that per a Cambridge study, %25 of people who were vaccinated developed VAIDS. Is this a correct interpretation of the study? I looked at the study briefly and it seemed to say that the immune systems of %25 of the vaxxed developed some kind of nonsesensical coding (?) or something but that it was harmless. Anyone know what's really going on? https://slaynews.com/news/25-vaxxed-have-vaids-cambridge-scientists-warn/?utm_source=ground.news&utm_medium=referral
The US government conducts almost immediate recalls on food, eye drops and other products that have caused harm after ingestion or application, but here a blind eye is turned towards a vaccine.
I'm puzzled by Shiva's response. He's called out the COVID vaccines, and is a proponent of natural solutions. He's the guy who's echoed all we need is God's food out of the ground to our mouths, with no alterations made by man<paraphrased>. He is a bitter and proud soul and that may be why he made that remark. Now that he made it he needs to show us point by point how he substantiates it.
The British Petitions Committee has scheduled a debate on a Petition on the WHO International Health Regulations legislation
Monday 18 December at 11.30 am (London Time). The Department of Health and Social Care will send a Government Minister to respond.
Debates on e-petitions take place in Westminster Hall, the second chamber of the House of Commons. These are ‘general debate' motions expressed in neutral terms. These motions are worded ‘That this House has considered [a specific matter]'. This means that MPs taking part in the debate will not vote on the request of the petition at the end of the debate.
The scenario that worries me is one explained by Ed Dowd.
Dowd stated that the people responsible for this disaster know that they will be held to account. There will be no place to hide. They have to conduct multiple crises in order to distract people's energy.
Now we have the Gaza crises and a possible war with Iran.
Steve you are working way too hard. There is even clearer data shown at Naomi Wolf's website. Excess deaths fit like a glove with vaccination rates in country after country. You Malone McCullough everyone has been missing this. These charts are self explanatory, no need to talk till blue in the face to a bunch of math-challenged morons. Just LOOK: https://dailyclout.io/to-the-editor-shutting-down-the-correlation-does-not-equal-causation-gaslighting-tactic/
How much money does Big Pharma make for creating a "safe and effective" vaccine vs how much money do they make for creating a "dangerous and deadly" vaccine? In a perfect world, they would
be penalized for making a D&D vaccine, and paid a bonus for making a S&E vaccine. But, if they
hide the data, they literally don't care which one they make, as long as the Billion$ flow in. Uncovering
the true data needs to be the law. If you are a government agent, you should be jailed for hiding any vaccine safety data. How does the FDA, CDC, NIH, HHS get away with hiding the data from the public?
This is yet another data point out of the NZ Data that proves without a doubt that the Vax killed. If you overlay this data on a timeline with the # of COVID infections it becomes more apparent and obvious. As COVID infections were dropping, the Deaths were rising.
Over the weekend I saw an article plotting comparative average life expectancy to per capita dollars spent on healthcare by country, with the US being an outlier for both axes. Now I can’t find the article anywhere online. Anyone have a link?
I'd like to see you account for the con-founder of actual Covid death waves and Covid deaths. Those deaths peaked in Aug of 2022 and remained intermittently elevated thereafter.
Hi Steve, just a head-up on your post here - the link to Stats NZ to download the graph from their data - it says it has 'expired'. They wouldn't want us seeing that kind of information ourselves so it looks like they won't just let you to point it out for us to download!
Regards, Brent Ammon
You wrote about John Sullivan's plot that "the key is the orange mortality rate goes from around 2,500 in August to over 5,000 in December".
However in 2018-2022, the CMR of the 80-89 age group in New Zealand ranged from about 6,635 to 7,419 deaths per 100,000 person-years, but the upper end of the age band is overrepresented in the NZ data compared to the lower end: https://mongol-fi.github.io/moar.html#Representation_of_age_groups_in_the_dataset. Based on the age composition of the vaccinated people, I got an average baseline of about 8,463 for the CMR in December 2021, which is higher than the historical CMR for ages 80-89 because the upper end of the age group is overrepresented in the data compared to the lower end, and because I followed people who were 80-89 years old at the time of vaccination, so many of them were more than half a year older by December 2021.
When I took the first dose of each person who was 80-89 years old at the time of their dose and I followed the crude mortality rate of the cohort on each day until the end of the data, I got the same brief spike in mortality in June 2021 as Sullivan, but after that it took until June 2022 before the 14-day moving average of the CMR reached above the baseline. And even then the CMR only stayed above the baseline briefly, and June 2022 was in the middle of a COVID wave, and it was winter but I didn't account for seasonality when I calculated my baseline: https://mongol-fi.github.io/moar.html#Plot_by_John_Sullivan_for_crude_mortality_rate_by_date_in_ages_80_89.
The reason why the CMR of ages 80-89 was initially so far below the baseline could be because the healthy vaccinee effect seems to be stronger in older age groups than younger age groups.
"seems to be stronger," ? what does it last for 4 months instead of just 3 ? I don't believe there is any prophylactic effect of the vaccine at any age group, that is just speculation. I am late 70's and have avoided any 'flu' vaccine as much more likely to cause contraction than to protect from it, and the same here. Focus should be on bolstering natural immune, and protocols for early intervention if necessary, but there is no magic pill that allows society to eat puke all their lives and then get a 'shot' when bad habits start killing oneself.
Steve how could the comparison of vaccine data about different population sets and different vaccines possibly be correlated or causated? It doesn't make any sense. your pole is asking if it's correlation or causation to compare the death rate to different vaccinations with different statistics given at different times to different populations. Comparing the death rate for a short period of time after the shot. I am referring to a year or two as a short period of time. How could it possibly be correlation or causation?
Pilots with heart failure spiking nearly 1,000% in 2022.
https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/among-pilots-heart-failure-up-1000/
Pentagon saw significant spikes in: hypertension (2,181%), neurological disorders (1,048%), multiple sclerosis (680%), Guillain-Barre syndrome (551%), breast cancer, (487%), female infertility (472%), pulmonary embolism (468%), migraines (452%), ovarian dysfunction (437%), testicular cancer (369%), and tachycardia (302%). Heart-related ailments have soared over the past 5 years as well including hypertension (36%), ischemic heart disease (69%), pulmonary heart disease (62%), heart failure (973%), cardiomyopathy (152%), and other non-specified heart diseases (63%).
This is not on point, but this article says that per a Cambridge study, %25 of people who were vaccinated developed VAIDS. Is this a correct interpretation of the study? I looked at the study briefly and it seemed to say that the immune systems of %25 of the vaxxed developed some kind of nonsesensical coding (?) or something but that it was harmless. Anyone know what's really going on? https://slaynews.com/news/25-vaxxed-have-vaids-cambridge-scientists-warn/?utm_source=ground.news&utm_medium=referral
The US government conducts almost immediate recalls on food, eye drops and other products that have caused harm after ingestion or application, but here a blind eye is turned towards a vaccine.
I'm puzzled by Shiva's response. He's called out the COVID vaccines, and is a proponent of natural solutions. He's the guy who's echoed all we need is God's food out of the ground to our mouths, with no alterations made by man<paraphrased>. He is a bitter and proud soul and that may be why he made that remark. Now that he made it he needs to show us point by point how he substantiates it.
The British Petitions Committee has scheduled a debate on a Petition on the WHO International Health Regulations legislation
Monday 18 December at 11.30 am (London Time). The Department of Health and Social Care will send a Government Minister to respond.
Debates on e-petitions take place in Westminster Hall, the second chamber of the House of Commons. These are ‘general debate' motions expressed in neutral terms. These motions are worded ‘That this House has considered [a specific matter]'. This means that MPs taking part in the debate will not vote on the request of the petition at the end of the debate.
The correct Petition on the IHR Amendments is here - https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/635904
Watch the debate here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xAs1cmIPXoc
Read the transcript here - https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2023-12-18
no expert witnesses are allowed to speak ,they have all been put in the public gallery if they are there and under no circumstance can they speak
This was known in advance. This was taken into account.
The scenario that worries me is one explained by Ed Dowd.
Dowd stated that the people responsible for this disaster know that they will be held to account. There will be no place to hide. They have to conduct multiple crises in order to distract people's energy.
Now we have the Gaza crises and a possible war with Iran.
People are being Disassembled!
Battle for the Brain: Vaxx is stealing personalities, memories, motivation
https://jimychanga.substack.com/
i am absolutely not an expert but i downloaded the data and will try something.
Also if you take a look at 2023 excess death rates by country in Europe it is directly correlated to vax uptake.
Steve you are working way too hard. There is even clearer data shown at Naomi Wolf's website. Excess deaths fit like a glove with vaccination rates in country after country. You Malone McCullough everyone has been missing this. These charts are self explanatory, no need to talk till blue in the face to a bunch of math-challenged morons. Just LOOK: https://dailyclout.io/to-the-editor-shutting-down-the-correlation-does-not-equal-causation-gaslighting-tactic/
How much money does Big Pharma make for creating a "safe and effective" vaccine vs how much money do they make for creating a "dangerous and deadly" vaccine? In a perfect world, they would
be penalized for making a D&D vaccine, and paid a bonus for making a S&E vaccine. But, if they
hide the data, they literally don't care which one they make, as long as the Billion$ flow in. Uncovering
the true data needs to be the law. If you are a government agent, you should be jailed for hiding any vaccine safety data. How does the FDA, CDC, NIH, HHS get away with hiding the data from the public?
This is yet another data point out of the NZ Data that proves without a doubt that the Vax killed. If you overlay this data on a timeline with the # of COVID infections it becomes more apparent and obvious. As COVID infections were dropping, the Deaths were rising.