Yep, the bio aerosol ruse that refused to take into account factors such as contact time, viral load, environmental factors, etc...... The WHO actually admitted that transmission rates were far lower than claimed and that asymptomatic spread cases was rare. A WHO senior scientist I believe made the revelation. The worldwide media, governments across the planet all pushed testing 24/7/365. PU.
Yep, the bio aerosol ruse that refused to take into account factors such as contact time, viral load, environmental factors, etc...... The WHO actually admitted that transmission rates were far lower than claimed and that asymptomatic spread cases was rare. A WHO senior scientist I believe made the revelation. The worldwide media, governments across the planet all pushed testing 24/7/365. PU.
Tritorch, read your sources. Is absolutely true. The recommended Ct processing rate recommended by the Corman Drosten protocol was 45 Ct. Anything above 30 Ct has a very high probability of being false positive. The WHO, Eurosurveillance, NIH etc... fully endorsed the protocol the day after it was submitted. Normal approval process time for diagnostic testing is an average of 171 days. Christian Drosten, the project lead, is also the director of Eurosurveillance. Just one instance of conflict of interests associated with the protocol. The primary test approval agency in Europe. PU.
Yes sir, here are direct links to those crooked CTs directly from the manufactures. Amazing that they got away with this blatant fraud so easily, but then again, when you own the media...
[6a] https://archive.is/osMTZ Page: 1 28 Cycle Threshold for Breakthrough Cases (archived version - original has been removed by the CDC)
Yep, the bio aerosol ruse that refused to take into account factors such as contact time, viral load, environmental factors, etc...... The WHO actually admitted that transmission rates were far lower than claimed and that asymptomatic spread cases was rare. A WHO senior scientist I believe made the revelation. The worldwide media, governments across the planet all pushed testing 24/7/365. PU.
Tritorch, read your sources. Is absolutely true. The recommended Ct processing rate recommended by the Corman Drosten protocol was 45 Ct. Anything above 30 Ct has a very high probability of being false positive. The WHO, Eurosurveillance, NIH etc... fully endorsed the protocol the day after it was submitted. Normal approval process time for diagnostic testing is an average of 171 days. Christian Drosten, the project lead, is also the director of Eurosurveillance. Just one instance of conflict of interests associated with the protocol. The primary test approval agency in Europe. PU.
Yes sir, here are direct links to those crooked CTs directly from the manufactures. Amazing that they got away with this blatant fraud so easily, but then again, when you own the media...
[6a] https://archive.is/osMTZ Page: 1 28 Cycle Threshold for Breakthrough Cases (archived version - original has been removed by the CDC)
[6b] https://www.gkcmo.com/_files/ugd/3e64ae_5b987768893942e5b456d3a1cb6d0e2f.pdf Page 13: GK PCR Test with 40.00 Cycle Threshold
[6c] https://inbios.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/LBL-0109-08-900251-EUA-CE-Smart-Detect-SARS-CoV-2-rRT-PCR-Kit-Package-Insert.pdf Page 14: InBios PCR Test with 45 Cycle Threshold
[6d] https://www.fda.gov/media/136231/download Page 10: Quest Diagnostics 50 cycles
your (6b) link doesn't open....do you have a better one by chance please ??
Looks like that company went out of business or changed it's name. I was able to find a copy of the CT document in my archives:
https://tritorch.com/GKCMO
Perfect! Thank you
Unbelievable. And everyone of theses characters involved knew and knows what they were doing. PU.