It may be working. Massachusetts has pioneered this mandate path. They were the first to do Covid tracking(like China), but gave up on that recently. Massachusetts schools fell in line very early on with no dissent, but recently, schools have been backing off. There are only two colleges remaining who are mandating a fourth jab, the latest bivalent booster: Tufts and Harvard. The rest of the schools have thrown in the towel at three jabs. Keep emailing Tufts and Harvard!!
did you know that every state university has a lab funded by big pharma? a level 4 biohazard human/animal testing lab was moved from it's original location on plum island ny. to kansas state university- a lab well known for it's leakyness. it opened for business as of feb. 22 this year (2022) and then just like that, a large herd of cows to the southwest just unisonly dropped dead. this lab is right at the belly button of America. gates attended plandemic 2.0 getting ready for "it" again. wanna guess their target?
In 10-20 years these university presidents will be the Harvey Weinstein's of their time: shamed and ridiculed they'll be standing in court facing the rest of their lives in jail because at the time of their crimes the mob was on their side and turned a blind eye to their activities. In 10-20 years (hopefully sooner) the prevailing opinion will be this was mass murder and all those complicit will be facing their Nuremburg. They may think the law is on their side now, but let's wait and see how a different mob in the future interprets the law.
I partially agree. I think financial bribery of university presidents is real. Yet I also agree with the late
Dr. Zelenko that if are in a position of power and you do not follow the injection mandates than you and your family could be threatened with physical harm or worse. Think about what happened to some of the African presidents and leaders that refused to give covid shots to their citizens.
Most university presidents will not change course. They are getting paid enormous amounts of cash to force shots on their students. We need more FOIA reports on this to see who are paying them off.
This covid injection operation is highly coordinated and global. The public relations campaign to get every human on the planet injected is the largest in the history of humanity. So it begs some questions: who is financing this whole scam? What is the endgame of all this? Some claim it is depopulation. Some claim it is just to make all humans ill and dependent on medications and jabs. Whatever is going on I think it is not mass psychosis but pure evil. This is just my opinion. We can agree to disagree, but I just want this covid BS to end.
September 2022: In Ontario, Canada, open letters were sent to 8 post secondary institutions in response to their covid-19 policies. A copy was emailed to 1,638 media outlets as follows https://freedomrising.info/student-resources/ Not one response was received.
I'm copying my email to the president of NYU below, which I will use as a template for emails to other college and university presidents. I hope others will email or call as well. I know it's easy to be cynical and I understand that these corrupt administrators are far more interested in the money they rake in from risking the lives of their students (and faculty and staff as well in most cases), than in being responsible and ethical in any domain. However, the more feedback they receive on this, the more powerful the evidence against them will be when they ultimately face justice, and they will. They will not be able to claim ignorance nor that they had public support.
"President Hamilton,
For quite some time, even authorities and experts who had previously (although with no evidence) asserted that the covid shots were "safe and effective" have been forced to admit that these shots are neither, and in fact carry serious risks to health and can be deadly. This is especially true for young people in the age ranges most likely to be college and university students, who are at significantly increased risk for pericarditis, myocarditis and myopericarditis.
Since these shots have been definitively shown to prevent neither infection nor transmission, given their known dangers, there is absolutely no justification in requiring or even advising these injections.
The following article in the BMJ, "COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities" lists five ways in which requirements for these shots are unethical. I would add that in my opinion, "unethical" is a very mild word for these requirements.
If you have any concern for the health and welfare of the students who attend NYU, you will immediately call a halt to these irrational and immoral requirements.
Unethical is a mild term for actions, deliberated over or not, which don't conform to accepted norms. I think the word to be used to descrive these mandates, Steve, especially where faculty are not also mandated, is 'wicked'.
"University booster mandates are unethical. Period. Full stop." You are not telling the University Presidents, Administrators, or Faculty anything new with that statement. They have known this for two years (in addition to the fact that the shots are dangerous to, and unnecessary for, their students), and it should be obvious to all that they don't care.
I personally believe that people of child-bearing age (and younger) were the real target of the "vaccination" program. However, they could not be the first "vaccinated", since there was no medical reason to justify that. "Vaccinating" the elderly had to be first, since they were the most vulnerable. Then, "vaccinating" those who operated the critical infrastructure (doctors, nurses, teachers, military, law enforcement, pilots, etc.) both weakened the critical infrastructure and brought the "vaccination" process one step closer to the children. At that point, "vaccinating" the children could be justified on the basis of protecting their elders (although no evidence was ever shown that such protection existed).
So, what was the purpose of mandating these shots for students in the first place, and why is this practice continuing? Obviously, the moneys that the universities receive from the government, foundations, and industry play a role, but I don't think they play the main role. While the main job of most (if not all) University Presidents is to bring in money, I personally don't believe it would be done at the expense of a large number of students getting maimed or killed or sterilized or rendered infertile (in both the short and long-term). There have to be other objectives that would, in the minds of the mandaters, justify such drastic actions.
Here's what I believe. We have an existential problem from anthropogenic climate change. The survival of our species, and many other species, is at stake. If there is any chance left of avoiding the consequences of drastic climate change, it would require essentially zero combustion of fossil fuels (among other drastic measures). Given the realities, the only way this will be accomplished is 1) reduce the number of energy consumers and 2) reduce the energy consumption drastically of those who remain. University personnel tend to favor renewables and fossil fuel combustion reduction. For the fossil fuel use reduction component, given the difficulty of achieving 2), the remaining option is to reduce the number of consumers. If it turns out the main effect of the "vaccines" on the young is sterilization and infertility (as some studies suggest), this would be one way of drastically reducing the population (although such reduction would not be on a time scale compatible with avoiding irreversible climate change). I see no other reasons for the mandates.
Obviously, this is all speculation on my part. I have no way of looking into the minds of the mandaters, and seeing their true motives. Maybe they still believe the "vaccines" have a net health benefit, and their mandates are in the best interests of the students. It's hard for me to accept that thesis, given the flood of information to the contrary that has emerged already. However, many people who should have known better took the shots, so the same may be true for the mandaters.
What do other readers believe is the motivation of the mandaters, if not either of the two described above?
It may be working. Massachusetts has pioneered this mandate path. They were the first to do Covid tracking(like China), but gave up on that recently. Massachusetts schools fell in line very early on with no dissent, but recently, schools have been backing off. There are only two colleges remaining who are mandating a fourth jab, the latest bivalent booster: Tufts and Harvard. The rest of the schools have thrown in the towel at three jabs. Keep emailing Tufts and Harvard!!
Just emailed presidents with a plea for action, undergrad and grad universities.
did you know that every state university has a lab funded by big pharma? a level 4 biohazard human/animal testing lab was moved from it's original location on plum island ny. to kansas state university- a lab well known for it's leakyness. it opened for business as of feb. 22 this year (2022) and then just like that, a large herd of cows to the southwest just unisonly dropped dead. this lab is right at the belly button of America. gates attended plandemic 2.0 getting ready for "it" again. wanna guess their target?
I don't like linking a risk benefit analysis to the ethics of mandates.
Vaccine mandates are unethical period. Even if a vaccine were wonderfully effective, a mandate would still be unethical.
It's not just university mandates. Wake up people. All mandates are unethical.
I hope you are correct Paul, but a lot of the judges are bought off and owned.
In 10-20 years these university presidents will be the Harvey Weinstein's of their time: shamed and ridiculed they'll be standing in court facing the rest of their lives in jail because at the time of their crimes the mob was on their side and turned a blind eye to their activities. In 10-20 years (hopefully sooner) the prevailing opinion will be this was mass murder and all those complicit will be facing their Nuremburg. They may think the law is on their side now, but let's wait and see how a different mob in the future interprets the law.
I partially agree. I think financial bribery of university presidents is real. Yet I also agree with the late
Dr. Zelenko that if are in a position of power and you do not follow the injection mandates than you and your family could be threatened with physical harm or worse. Think about what happened to some of the African presidents and leaders that refused to give covid shots to their citizens.
Most university presidents will not change course. They are getting paid enormous amounts of cash to force shots on their students. We need more FOIA reports on this to see who are paying them off.
This covid injection operation is highly coordinated and global. The public relations campaign to get every human on the planet injected is the largest in the history of humanity. So it begs some questions: who is financing this whole scam? What is the endgame of all this? Some claim it is depopulation. Some claim it is just to make all humans ill and dependent on medications and jabs. Whatever is going on I think it is not mass psychosis but pure evil. This is just my opinion. We can agree to disagree, but I just want this covid BS to end.
Blood on their hands. https://rumble.com/v1z0nog-youre-violating-them-dr.-naomi-wolf-gives-a-fiery-speech-against-yale-unive.html
September 2022: In Ontario, Canada, open letters were sent to 8 post secondary institutions in response to their covid-19 policies. A copy was emailed to 1,638 media outlets as follows https://freedomrising.info/student-resources/ Not one response was received.
I'm copying my email to the president of NYU below, which I will use as a template for emails to other college and university presidents. I hope others will email or call as well. I know it's easy to be cynical and I understand that these corrupt administrators are far more interested in the money they rake in from risking the lives of their students (and faculty and staff as well in most cases), than in being responsible and ethical in any domain. However, the more feedback they receive on this, the more powerful the evidence against them will be when they ultimately face justice, and they will. They will not be able to claim ignorance nor that they had public support.
"President Hamilton,
For quite some time, even authorities and experts who had previously (although with no evidence) asserted that the covid shots were "safe and effective" have been forced to admit that these shots are neither, and in fact carry serious risks to health and can be deadly. This is especially true for young people in the age ranges most likely to be college and university students, who are at significantly increased risk for pericarditis, myocarditis and myopericarditis.
Since these shots have been definitively shown to prevent neither infection nor transmission, given their known dangers, there is absolutely no justification in requiring or even advising these injections.
The following article in the BMJ, "COVID-19 vaccine boosters for young adults: a risk benefit assessment and ethical analysis of mandate policies at universities" lists five ways in which requirements for these shots are unethical. I would add that in my opinion, "unethical" is a very mild word for these requirements.
https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2022/12/05/jme-2022-108449
If you have any concern for the health and welfare of the students who attend NYU, you will immediately call a halt to these irrational and immoral requirements.
Unethical is a mild term for actions, deliberated over or not, which don't conform to accepted norms. I think the word to be used to descrive these mandates, Steve, especially where faculty are not also mandated, is 'wicked'.
Write, email, fax, call, end it ALL!
If every tuition-paying parent pulled their child from school to protest the university jab mandates, universities would back off.
"University booster mandates are unethical. Period. Full stop." You are not telling the University Presidents, Administrators, or Faculty anything new with that statement. They have known this for two years (in addition to the fact that the shots are dangerous to, and unnecessary for, their students), and it should be obvious to all that they don't care.
I personally believe that people of child-bearing age (and younger) were the real target of the "vaccination" program. However, they could not be the first "vaccinated", since there was no medical reason to justify that. "Vaccinating" the elderly had to be first, since they were the most vulnerable. Then, "vaccinating" those who operated the critical infrastructure (doctors, nurses, teachers, military, law enforcement, pilots, etc.) both weakened the critical infrastructure and brought the "vaccination" process one step closer to the children. At that point, "vaccinating" the children could be justified on the basis of protecting their elders (although no evidence was ever shown that such protection existed).
So, what was the purpose of mandating these shots for students in the first place, and why is this practice continuing? Obviously, the moneys that the universities receive from the government, foundations, and industry play a role, but I don't think they play the main role. While the main job of most (if not all) University Presidents is to bring in money, I personally don't believe it would be done at the expense of a large number of students getting maimed or killed or sterilized or rendered infertile (in both the short and long-term). There have to be other objectives that would, in the minds of the mandaters, justify such drastic actions.
Here's what I believe. We have an existential problem from anthropogenic climate change. The survival of our species, and many other species, is at stake. If there is any chance left of avoiding the consequences of drastic climate change, it would require essentially zero combustion of fossil fuels (among other drastic measures). Given the realities, the only way this will be accomplished is 1) reduce the number of energy consumers and 2) reduce the energy consumption drastically of those who remain. University personnel tend to favor renewables and fossil fuel combustion reduction. For the fossil fuel use reduction component, given the difficulty of achieving 2), the remaining option is to reduce the number of consumers. If it turns out the main effect of the "vaccines" on the young is sterilization and infertility (as some studies suggest), this would be one way of drastically reducing the population (although such reduction would not be on a time scale compatible with avoiding irreversible climate change). I see no other reasons for the mandates.
Obviously, this is all speculation on my part. I have no way of looking into the minds of the mandaters, and seeing their true motives. Maybe they still believe the "vaccines" have a net health benefit, and their mandates are in the best interests of the students. It's hard for me to accept that thesis, given the flood of information to the contrary that has emerged already. However, many people who should have known better took the shots, so the same may be true for the mandaters.
What do other readers believe is the motivation of the mandaters, if not either of the two described above?