A combination makes sense to me. They want the money, and need the justification of fighting "climate change" to calm any pangs of conscience (which I suspect are few). Denial helps, as does the belief that the money is for a good cause (at least whatever is left over from what they skim, and as long as they convince themselves that the …
A combination makes sense to me. They want the money, and need the justification of fighting "climate change" to calm any pangs of conscience (which I suspect are few). Denial helps, as does the belief that the money is for a good cause (at least whatever is left over from what they skim, and as long as they convince themselves that the twisted indoctrination they are inflicting on students is good).
A combination makes sense to me. They want the money, and need the justification of fighting "climate change" to calm any pangs of conscience (which I suspect are few). Denial helps, as does the belief that the money is for a good cause (at least whatever is left over from what they skim, and as long as they convince themselves that the twisted indoctrination they are inflicting on students is good).