Since you received a response from "A", who does not have the time to look in depth --
....perhaps you should ask him WHOM he believes should bear the burden of proof to rule out vaxx as causality. After all, a potential signal of harm for an experiment carries the "guilty until proven innocent" approach. It's called the precautionary principle.
Since you received a response from "A", who does not have the time to look in depth --
....perhaps you should ask him WHOM he believes should bear the burden of proof to rule out vaxx as causality. After all, a potential signal of harm for an experiment carries the "guilty until proven innocent" approach. It's called the precautionary principle.
Since you received a response from "A", who does not have the time to look in depth --
....perhaps you should ask him WHOM he believes should bear the burden of proof to rule out vaxx as causality. After all, a potential signal of harm for an experiment carries the "guilty until proven innocent" approach. It's called the precautionary principle.